IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v5y1989i2p472-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of a mandated accounting change on the capitalization process

Author

Listed:
  • RANDOLPH P. BEATTY
  • ROBERT E. VERRECCHIA

Abstract

. We hypothesize that a mandated accounting change (MAC) that disallows the deferral of revenues or capitalization of expenditures causes the aggregate deferred revenue and capitalized expenditure flows to fall below their levels prior to the change. In addition, the deferred revenue or capitalized expenditure flows after a MAC will exceed the pre†MAC levels that would have resulted from formerly capitalizing or deferring these items. We discuss using deferred tax flows as a proxy for a firm's level of capitalization and deferral. Finally, we test our hypothesis by examining changes in deferred tax flows for a sample of firms that capitalized research and development costs prior to the promulgation of FAS2. The test results indicate that managers actively restored revenue flows and capitalized expenditures for the period immediately following FAS2. Second, smaller firms appear to be more active in this restoration process than larger firms. Finally, the decline in the rate of growth of depreciation for capitalizing firms suggests that managers may have influenced the capitalization of costs to restore earnings to pre†FAS2 levels. Résumé. Les auteurs posent l'hypothèse selon laquelle une modification comptable non discrétionnaire (MCND) par suite de l'interdiction du report de produits ou de la capitalisation de dépenses fait en sorte que les flux globaux des produits reportés et des dépenses capitalisées diminuent au†dessous des niveaux qu'ils affichaient avant la modification. En outre, les flux de produits reportés ou de dépenses capitalisées après une MCND excéderont les niveaux qui auraient résulté de la capitalisation ou du report de ces éléments avant la MCND. Les auteurs traitent de l'utilisation des flux d'impôt reporté d'une entreprise à litre de substitut du niveau de capitalisation et de report. Enfin, ils vérifient leur hypothèse en examinant les changements des flux d'impôt reporté pour un échantillon d'entreprises qui ont capitalisé leurs frais de recherche et de développement avant la promulgation par le FASB de la Norme no2. Les résultats du test indiquent que les gestionnaires ont activement rétabli les flux de produits reportés et de dépenses capitalisées pendant la période suivant immédiatement la Norme no 2. Deuxièmement, les entreprises plus petites semblent plus enclines à opérer ce processus de rétablissement que les entreprises plus grandes. Enfin, le déclin du taux de croissance de l'amortissement pour les entreprises qui recourent à la capitalisation donne à penser que les gestionnaires peuvent avoir joué sur la capitalisation des coûts pour ramener les bénéfices à leurs niveaux antérieurs à la Norme no2.

Suggested Citation

  • Randolph P. Beatty & Robert E. Verrecchia, 1989. "The effect of a mandated accounting change on the capitalization process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 472-493, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:5:y:1989:i:2:p:472-493
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00717.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00717.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00717.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verrecchia, Robert E., 1986. "Managerial discretion in the choice among financial reporting alternatives," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 175-195, October.
    2. Holthausen, Robert W. & Leftwich, Richard W., 1983. "The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 77-117, April.
    3. Horwitz, Bn & Kolodny, R, 1980. "The Economic-Effects Of Involuntary Uniformity In The Financial-Reporting Of R And D Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18, pages 38-74.
    4. Larcker, David F., 1983. "The association between performance plan adoption and corporate capital investment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 3-30, April.
    5. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1982. "Mandated successful efforts and auditor choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 171-203, December.
    6. Jarrell, Gregg A., 1979. "Pro-producer regulation and accounting for assets : The case of electric utilities," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 93-116, August.
    7. Dukes, Re & Dyckman, Tr & Elliott, Ja, 1980. "Accounting For Research And Development Costs - The Impact On Research And Development Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18, pages 1-26.
    8. Elliott, J & Richardson, G & Dyckman, T & Dukes, R, 1984. "The Impact Of Sfas No-2 On Firm Expenditures On Research And Development - Replications And Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 85-102.
    9. Healy, Paul M., 1985. "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 85-107, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martha L. Loudder & Bruce K. Behn, 1995. "Alternative Income Determination Rules and Earnings Usefulness: The Case of R&D Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 185-205, September.
    2. Matthew Shaffer, 2024. "Which multiples matter in M &A? An overview," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2724-2752, September.
    3. John M. Friedlan, 1994. "Accounting Choices of Issuers of Initial Public Offerings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ermans, C.J.C., 1996. "Financial Disclosure : A Closer Look," Research Memorandum 722, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. S. P. Kothari & Ted E. Laguerre & Andrew J. Leone, 2002. "Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures versus R&D Outlays," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 355-382, December.
    3. Ehsan Habib Feroz & Robert L. Hagerman, 1990. "Management Compensation, Insider Trading and Lobbying Choice: The Case of R & D," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 15(2), pages 297-314, December.
    4. Kabir, Humayun & Su, Li, 2022. "How did IFRS 15 affect the revenue recognition practices and financial statements of firms? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. John S. Hughes & Jennifer L. Kao, 1991. "Economic implications of alternative disclosure rules for research and development costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 152-169, September.
    6. Dennis Oswald & Ana Simpson & Paul Zarowin, 2022. "Capitalization vs. expensing and the behavior of R&D expenditures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1199-1232, December.
    7. Ramachandran Ramanan & Bala V. Balachandran, 1993. "Management Compensation Surrounding an Accounting Change and Long†Term Construction Projects," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 211-226, September.
    8. Anne Beatty, 2007. "How does changing measurement change management behaviour? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 63-71.
    9. Ermans, C.J.C., 1996. "Financial Disclosure : A Closer Look," Other publications TiSEM 4848d7e0-2c3b-4566-99cd-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. van Lent, L.A.G.M., 1999. "Incomplete contracting theory in empirical accounting research," Other publications TiSEM 088f797d-9fa4-4081-98f4-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Dean Hanlon, 2019. "Mandatory accounting change and debt covenant violation: Additional evidence from SFAS 150," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 355-387, August.
    12. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.
    13. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    14. Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Corporate investment and changes in GAAP," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-63, March.
    15. Martha L. Loudder & Bruce K. Behn, 1995. "Alternative Income Determination Rules and Earnings Usefulness: The Case of R&D Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 185-205, September.
    16. Thomas W. Scott, 1991. "Pension disclosures under SFAS No. 87: Theory and evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 62-81, September.
    17. Hand, John R. M. & Skantz, Terrance R., 1997. "The economic determinants of accounting choices: The unique case of equity carve-outs under SAB 51," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 175-203, December.
    18. Bushman, Robert M. & Smith, Abbie J., 2001. "Financial accounting information and corporate governance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 237-333, December.
    19. Tony Abrahams & Baljit K. Sidhu, 1998. "The Role of R&D Capitalisations in Firm Valuation and Perfor Mance Measurement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 23(2), pages 169-183, December.
    20. Brooks, Raymond M. & May, Don O. & Mishra, Chandra S., 2001. "The performance of firms before and after they adopt accounting-based performance plans," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 205-222.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:5:y:1989:i:2:p:472-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.