IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v35y2018i1p117-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flight to Quality in International Markets: Investors’ Demand for Financial Reporting Quality during Political Uncertainty Events

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Chen
  • Ole‐Kristian Hope
  • Qingyuan Li
  • Xin Wang

Abstract

We examine whether international equity mutual fund managers shift their portfolios toward stocks with higher financial reporting quality (FRQ) during periods of high political uncertainty. Our study is motivated by two primary factors. First, prior research shows evidence of fund managers’ “flight to quality” (e.g., to less risky securities) during periods of uncertainty. Second, recent theoretical research concludes that stocks with higher FRQ are assessed as less sensitive to systematic risk (such as political uncertainty). We employ national elections as exogenous increases in systematic risk in the local markets and accordingly use an international sample of mutual funds that focus on local markets. We find that mutual fund managers shift their equity holdings to stocks with higher FRQ during election periods when political uncertainty is higher. Such a flight‐to‐quality effect is less pronounced for elections with larger expected electoral margins in the pre‐election period (i.e., when the incumbent is more likely to win the election) and for countries with higher transactions costs. In contrast, the effect is more pronounced when governments have greater involvement in the local economy. Our inferences are robust to alternative proxies for political uncertainty and FRQ and to numerous other sensitivity analyses. Les auteurs se demandent si les gestionnaires de fonds communs de placement internationaux orientent leurs portefeuilles vers des actions auxquelles est associée une qualité d'information financière supérieure en période de grande incertitude politique. Leur étude est motivée par deux facteurs principaux. Premièrement, les travaux de recherche précédents établissent que les gestionnaires de fonds « recherchent la qualité » (c'est‐à‐dire des titres présentant moins de risque) encore davantage en période d'incertitude. Deuxièmement, les travaux théoriques récents mènent à la conclusion que les actions auxquelles est associée une qualité plus élevée de l'information financière sont jugées moins sensibles au risque systématique (comme celui de l'incertitude politique). Les auteurs utilisent les élections nationales comme facteur exogène d'augmentation du risque systématique sur les marchés régionaux et analysent donc un échantillon international de fonds communs de placement qui se concentrent sur les marchés régionaux. Ils constatent que les gestionnaires de fonds communs de placement orientent leur portefeuille vers des actions auxquelles est associée une qualité supérieure de l'information financière en période d’élection, lorsque l'incertitude politique est plus grande. Cette recherche de la qualité est moins marquée dans le cas d’élections dans lesquelles la marge électorale prévue avant l’élection est plus élevée (c'est‐à‐dire que le titulaire sortant est davantage susceptible de remporter l’élection) et de pays dont les coûts de transaction sont plus élevés. En revanche, elle est plus marquée lorsque le gouvernement joue un rôle plus important dans l’économie régionale. Les conclusions des auteurs résistent à l'utilisation de différents indicateurs de l'incertitude politique et de la qualité de l'information financière ainsi qu’à de nombreuses autres analyses de sensibilité.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Chen & Ole‐Kristian Hope & Qingyuan Li & Xin Wang, 2018. "Flight to Quality in International Markets: Investors’ Demand for Financial Reporting Quality during Political Uncertainty Events," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 117-155, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:117-155
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Guan-Ying & Shen, Carl Hsin-han & Wu, Zhen-Xing, 2023. "Firm-level political risk and debt choice," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Ole‐Kristian Hope & Pingui Rao & Yanping Xu & Heng Yue, 2023. "Information sharing between mutual funds and auditors," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 152-197, January.
    3. Azra Zaimovic & Adna Omanovic & Almira Arnaut-Berilo, 2021. "How Many Stocks Are Sufficient for Equity Portfolio Diversification? A Review of the Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, November.
    4. Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Kousenidis, Dimitrios & Ladas, Anestis & Negkakis, Christos, 2020. "Regulation of capital flows: Effects on liquidity and the role of financial reporting quality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 86-97.
    5. Hasan, Iftekhar & Kim, Incheol & Teng, Haimeng & Wu, Qiang, 2022. "The effect of foreign institutional ownership on corporate tax avoidance: International evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    6. Xue, Xingnan & Hu, Nan, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and imitation behaviors of corporate social responsibility practices: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Charles Shaw, 2022. "Portfolio Diversification Revisited," Papers 2204.13398, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:117-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.