IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v20y2024i4ne70009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol: Machine learning for selecting moderators in meta‐analysis: A systematic review of methods and their applications, and an evaluation using data on tutoring interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Dietrichson
  • Rasmus Klokker
  • Trine Filges
  • Elizabeth Bengtsen
  • Therese D. Pigott

Abstract

Objectives This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: The first objective is to find and describe machine and statistical learning (ML) methods designed for moderator meta‐analysis. The second objective is to find and describe applications of such ML methods in moderator meta‐analyses of health, medical, and social science interventions. These two parts of the meta‐review will primarily involve a systematic review and will be conducted according to guidelines specified by the Campbell Collaboration (MECCIR guidelines). The outcomes will be a list of ML methods that are designed for moderator meta‐analysis (first objective), and a description of how (some of) these methods have been applied in the health, medical, and social sciences (second objective). The third objective is to examine how the ML methods identified in the meta‐review can help researchers formulate new hypotheses or select among existing ones, and compare the identified methods to one another and to regular meta‐regression methods for moderator analysis. To compare the performance of different moderator meta‐analysis methods, we will apply the methods to data on tutoring interventions from two systematic reviews of interventions to improve academic achievement for students with or at risk‐of academic difficulties, and to an independent test sample of tutoring studies published after the search period in the two reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Dietrichson & Rasmus Klokker & Trine Filges & Elizabeth Bengtsen & Therese D. Pigott, 2024. "Protocol: Machine learning for selecting moderators in meta‐analysis: A systematic review of methods and their applications, and an evaluation using data on tutoring interventions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:4:n:e70009
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. Martin Bøg & Jens Dietrichson & Anna A. Isaksson, 2021. "A multi-sensory tutoring program for students at risk of reading difficulties: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(3), pages 233-251, April.
    3. Jens Dietrichson & Morten Kjær Thomsen & Julie Kaas Seerup & Martin Williams Strandby & Bjørn Christian Arleth Viinholt & Elizabeth Bengtsen, 2022. "PROTOCOL: School‐based language, math, and reading interventions for executive functions in children and adolescents: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    4. Elizabeth Tipton & James E. Pustejovsky, 2015. "Small-Sample Adjustments for Tests of Moderators and Model Fit Using Robust Variance Estimation in Meta-Regression," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(6), pages 604-634, December.
    5. Jens Dietrichson & Trine Filges & Julie K. Seerup & Rasmus H. Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Martin Bøg & Misja Eiberg, 2021. "Targeted school‐based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K‐6: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    6. Gary Ritter & George Denny & Ginger Albin & Joshua Barnett & Virginia Blankenship, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Volunteer Tutoring Programs: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-63.
    7. Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 87-106, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Dietrichson & Morten Kjær Thomsen & Julie Kaas Seerup & Martin Williams Strandby & Bjørn Christian Arleth Viinholt & Elizabeth Bengtsen, 2022. "PROTOCOL: School‐based language, math, and reading interventions for executive functions in children and adolescents: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    2. Robert D. Meade & Ashley P. Akerman & Sean R. Notley & Gregory W. McGarr & Emma R. McCourt & Nathalie V. Kirby & Joseph T. Costello & James D. Cotter & Craig G. Crandall & Antonella Zanobetti & Glen P, 2025. "Meta-analysis of heat-induced changes in cardiac function from over 400 laboratory-based heat exposure studies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Shengying Zhai & Qihui Chen & Wenxin Wang, 2019. "What Drives Green Fodder Supply in China?—A Nerlovian Analysis with LASSO Variable Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Stephanie Houle & Ryan Macdonald, 2023. "Identifying Nascent High-Growth Firms Using Machine Learning," Staff Working Papers 23-53, Bank of Canada.
    5. Morten K. Thomsen & Julie K. Seerup & Jens Dietrichson & Anja Bondebjerg & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Testing frequency and student achievement: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    6. Philipp Kugler, 2022. "The role of wage beliefs in the decision to become a nurse," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 94-111, January.
    7. Abhilash Bandam & Eedris Busari & Chloi Syranidou & Jochen Linssen & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Classification of Building Types in Germany: A Data-Driven Modeling Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Boonstra Philip S. & Little Roderick J.A. & West Brady T. & Andridge Rebecca R. & Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda, 2021. "A Simulation Study of Diagnostics for Selection Bias," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 751-769, September.
    9. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    10. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    11. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    12. Thiemo Fetzer & Stephan Kyburz, 2024. "Cohesive Institutions and Political Violence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(1), pages 133-150, January.
    13. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Dang, Hai-Anh & Carletto, Calogero & Gourlay, Sydney & Abanokova, Kseniya, 2024. "Addressing Soil Quality Data Gaps with Imputation: Evidence from Ethiopia and Uganda," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1445, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2020. "Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 428-446, September.
    17. Sascha O. Becker & Thiemo Fetzer, 2018. "Has Eastern European Migration Impacted UK-born Workers?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 376, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    18. Eunsil Seok & Akhgar Ghassabian & Yuyan Wang & Mengling Liu, 2024. "Statistical Methods for Modeling Exposure Variables Subject to Limit of Detection," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(2), pages 435-458, July.
    19. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    20. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:4:n:e70009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.