IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v20y2024i4ne1435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Promise Nduku
  • John Ategeka
  • Andile Madonsela
  • Tanya Mdlalose
  • Jennifer Stevenson
  • Shannon Shisler
  • Suvarna Pande
  • Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: Our aim is to collect, assess, and synthesise all the available empirical evidence on what works to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers. In doing so, we will aim to answer the following research questions: What are the impacts of interventions to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers? What are the factors which have influenced the impact of these interventions, and their design and implementation in low‐ and middle‐income countries? In answering these questions, our goal is to estimate the overall impact and relative effectiveness of different interventions, identify factors or configurations of factors that support or hinder their effectiveness in low‐ and middle‐income countries and to identify gaps and areas for future primary research.

Suggested Citation

  • Promise Nduku & John Ategeka & Andile Madonsela & Tanya Mdlalose & Jennifer Stevenson & Shannon Shisler & Suvarna Pande & Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer, 2024. "Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:4:n:e1435
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1435
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Hjort & Diana Moreira & Gautam Rao & Juan Francisco Santini, 2021. "How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1442-1480, May.
    2. Hugh Waddington & Howard White & Birte Snilstveit & Jorge Garcia Hombrados & Martina Vojtkova & Philip Davies & Ami Bhavsar & John Eyers & Tracey Perez Koehlmoos & Mark Petticrew & Jeffrey C. Valentin, 2012. "How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 359-387, September.
    3. Sheheryar Banuri & Stefan Dercon & Varun Gauri, 2019. "Biased Policy Professionals," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(2), pages 310-327.
    4. David L. Sackett & William M. C. Rosenberg, 1995. "On the need for evidence‐based medicine," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 249-254, July.
    5. David B. Wilson & David Weisburd & David McClure, 2011. "Use of DNA testing in police investigative work for increasing offender identification, arrest, conviction and case clearance," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 1-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Marta Moratti & Shannon Shisler & Birte Snilstveit & John Eyers, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    2. Atheendar S. Venkataramani, 2021. "Rigor, Relevance, And Researcher Independence In Evidence‐Based Policymaking," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 660-663, March.
    3. Atheendar S. Venkataramani, 2021. "Rigor, Relevance, And Researcher Independence In Evidence‐Based Policymaking," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 659-662, March.
    4. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Shannon Shisler & Marta Moratti & Cem Yavuz & Arnab Acharya & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2021. "Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    5. Etienne Lwamba & Shannon Shisler & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Nkululeko Tshabalala & Promise Nduku & Laurenz Langer & Sean Grant & Ada Sonnenfeld & Daniela Anda & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2022. "Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    6. Vivalt, Eva & Coville, Aidan, 2023. "How do policymakers update their beliefs?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Monica Jain & Shannon Shisler & Charlotte Lane & Avantika Bagai & Elizabeth Brown & Mark Engelbert & Yoav Vardy & John Eyers & Daniela Anda Leon & Shradha S. Parsekar, 2022. "Use of community engagement interventions to improve child immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    8. Toma, Mattie & Bell, Elizabeth, 2024. "Understanding and increasing policymakers’ sensitivity to program impact," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Rogger, Daniel & Somani, Ravi, 2023. "Hierarchy and Information," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2023. "Rural electrification, the credibility revolution, and the limits of evidence-based policy," Ruhr Economic Papers 1051, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Vivalt, Eva & Coville, Aidan & KC, Sampada, 2025. "Local knowledge, formal evidence, and policy decisions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Etienne Lwamba & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Shannon Shisler & Ada Sonnenfeld & Laurenz Langer & John Eyers & Sean Grant & Bidisha Barooah, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    13. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    14. Lenyeletse V. Basupi & Claire H. Quinn & Andrew J. Dougill, 2017. "Pastoralism and Land Tenure Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Conflicting Policies and Priorities in Ngamiland, Botswana," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2023. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 3-40, March.
    16. Andrew Dustan & Stanislao Maldonado & Juan Manuel Hernandez-Agramonte, 2018. "Motivating bureaucrats with non-monetary incentives when state capacity is weak: Evidence from large-scale field experiments in Peru," Working Papers 136, Peruvian Economic Association.
    17. Fernandes, Vitor Bukvar & Reydon, Bastiaan Philip, 2024. "An exploration of the relationship between land governance and development through a systematic review of interventions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Ahmed Al-Imam & Ban A. AbdulMajeed, 2017. "Novel Psychoactive Substances: Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-1, November.
    19. Mathieu Ouimet & Nabil Amara & Réjean Landry & John Lavis, 2007. "Direct interactions medical school faculty members have with professionals and managers working in public and private sector organizations: A cross-sectional study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 307-323, August.
    20. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:4:n:e1435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.