IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v20y2024i3ne1423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia Mercier
  • Sarah Yu Fu
  • Rachel Filler
  • Alexie Leclerc
  • Kari Sampsel
  • Karine Fournier
  • Mark Walker
  • Shi Wu Wen
  • Katherine Muldoon

Abstract

Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent global health problem. IPV that occurs before pregnancy often continues during the perinatal period, resulting in ongoing violence and many adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes. Objectives This scoping review is designed to broadly capture all potential interventions for perinatal IPV and describe their core components and measured outcomes. Search Methods We conducted a search for empirical studies describing IPV interventions in the perinatal population in June 2022. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv. Hand searching of references from select articles was also performed. Selection Criteria Included studies described an intervention for those experiencing IPV during the perinatal period, including 12 months before pregnancy, while pregnant or in the 12 months post‐partum. The search encompassed January 2000 to June 2022 and only peer‐reviewed studies written in either English or French were included. Included interventions focused on the survivor exposed to IPV, rather than healthcare professionals administering the intervention. Interventions designed to reduce IPV revictimization or any adverse maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal health outcomes as well as social outcomes related to IPV victimization were included. Data Collections and Analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration. Main Results In total, 10,079 titles and abstracts were screened and 226 proceeded to full text screening. A total of 67 studies included perinatal IPV interventions and were included in the final sample. These studies included a total of 27,327 participants. Included studies originated from 19 countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials (n = 43). Most studies were of moderate or low quality. Interventions included home visitation, educational modules, counseling, and cash transfer programs and occurred primarily in community obstetrician and gynecologist clinics, hospitals, or in participants' homes. Most interventions focused on reducing revictimization of IPV (n = 38), improving survivor knowledge or acceptance of violence, knowledge of community resources, and actions to reduce violence (n = 28), and improving maternal mental health outcomes (n = 26). Few studies evaluated the effect of perinatal IPV interventions on obstetrical, neonatal or child health outcomes. Authors' Conclusion(s) The majority of intervention studies for perinatal IPV focus on reducing revictimization and improving mental health outcomes, very few included obstetrical, neonatal, and other physical health outcomes. Future interventions should place a larger emphasis on targeting maternal and neonatal outcomes to have the largest possible impact on the lives and families of IPV survivors and their infants.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia Mercier & Sarah Yu Fu & Rachel Filler & Alexie Leclerc & Kari Sampsel & Karine Fournier & Mark Walker & Shi Wu Wen & Katherine Muldoon, 2024. "Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:3:n:e1423
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poonam Rishal & Kunta Devi Pun & Berit Schei & Buna Bhandari & Sunil Kumar Joshi & Katarina Swahnberg & Jennifer Jean Infanti & Mirjam Lukasse & the ADVANCE study group, 2020. "Improving Safety Among Pregnant Women Reporting Domestic Violence in Nepal—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Jacobs, F. & Easterbrooks, M.A. & Goldberg, J. & Mistry, J. & Bumgarner, E. & Raskin, M. & Fosse, N. & Fauth, R., 2016. "Improving adolescent parenting: Results from a randomized controlled trial of a home visiting program for young families," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(2), pages 342-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mynti Hossain & Lauren Akers & Patricia Del Grosso & Marisa Shenk & Michael Cavanaugh & Melissa Azur, "undated". "Touchpoints for Addressing Substance Use Issues in Home Visiting: Phase 1 Final Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0761ea54498b4f27b8d238e2b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Stargel, Lauren E. & Easterbrooks, M. Ann, 2020. "Diversity of adverse childhood experiences among adolescent mothers and the intergenerational transmission of risk to children's behavior problems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Jessica Harding & Jean Knab & Susan Zief & Kevin Kelly & Diana McCallum, "undated". "A Systematic Review of Programs to Promote Aspects of Teen Parents’ Self-Sufficiency: Supporting Educational Outcomes and Healthy Birth Spacing," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 05e656f1b4a54dae83654795b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Kelly, Cara & LeCroy, Craig, 2022. "Can we measure risk in home visitation? An examination of the predictive validity of the Healthy Families Parenting Inventory (HFPI)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:3:n:e1423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.