IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v33y2024i4p685-705.html

A thematic analysis of code of ethics disclosures in SEC 8‐K Item 5.05

Author

Listed:
  • Charles P. Cullinan
  • Richard Holowczak
  • David Louton
  • Hakan Saraoglu

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires the disclosure of changes to or waivers of corporate codes of ethics. Because the nature of amendments or waivers can vary, we expect the text of Item 5.05 to include different topics within different filings. We examine the population of these disclosures in Item 5.05 8‐K filings from 2004 to 2020. While previous studies utilized small samples (fewer than 50 observations) to examine limited aspects of these filings, we use the population of these filings from 2004 to 2020 (2121 8‐K filings) to elucidate the nature and details of the disclosures. We assess whether Latent Dirichlet Allocation—a computational linguistics technique—can help discern the underlying topics represented in filings. While the Securities and Exchange Commission identifies two topics—amendments and waivers—the Latent Dirichlet Allocation analysis reveals four topics (three related to amendments): (1) code updates and clarifications; (2) combining codes of conduct for all officers and employees, or splitting codes to include a code directly applicable to senior financial officers; (3) codes of ethics waivers; and (4) substantive code changes. The overall trend is for fewer 8‐Ks to be filed in recent years, with updates and clarifications becoming the predominant filing type. Our results further indicate that Item 5.05s related to updates and clarifications, and those related to combined or split codes, use fewer words and are more easily readable than those disclosing waivers or material code changes. Although we find no significant price reaction to Item 5.05 8‐K filings, we find significant trading volume and volatility reactions, suggesting that these disclosures could give rise to differences in opinion among investors, which is consistent with the US Senate's assertion that these disclosures are of interest to investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles P. Cullinan & Richard Holowczak & David Louton & Hakan Saraoglu, 2024. "A thematic analysis of code of ethics disclosures in SEC 8‐K Item 5.05," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 685-705, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:685-705
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12633
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharma, Meenakshi, 2014. "Ethics Statements on Websites of Indian Companies," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-05-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    2. Dyer, Travis & Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2017. "The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 221-245.
    3. Ligorio, Lorenzo & Venturelli, Andrea & Caputo, Fabio, 2022. "Tracing the boundaries between sustainable cities and cities for sustainable development. An LDA analysis of management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Tim Loughran & Bill McDonald, 2014. "Regulation and financial disclosure: The impact of plain English," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 94-113, February.
    5. Saurabh Ahluwalia & O. C. Ferrell & Linda Ferrell & Terri L. Rittenburg, 2018. "Sarbanes–Oxley Section 406 Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Firm Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 693-705, September.
    6. Karpoff, Jonathan M, 1986. "A Theory of Trading Volume," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(5), pages 1069-1087, December.
    7. Nerissa C. Brown & Richard M. Crowley & W. Brooke Elliott, 2020. "What Are You Saying? Using topic to Detect Financial Misreporting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(1), pages 237-291, March.
    8. Daniel W. Collins & Oliver Zhen Li & Hong Xie, 2009. "What drives the increased informativeness of earnings announcements over time?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, March.
    9. Henry L. Friedman & Mirko S. Heinle, 2016. "Taste, information, and asset prices: implications for the valuation of CSR," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 740-767, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles P. Cullinan & Richard Holowczak & David Louton & Hakan Saraoglu, 2023. "Costs associated with exit or disposal activities: A topic modeling investigation of disclosure and market reaction," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 173-191, October.
    2. Samuel B. Bonsall & Brian P. Miller, 2017. "The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 608-643, June.
    3. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    4. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2023. "Bloated Disclosures: Can ChatGPT Help Investors Process Information?," Papers 2306.10224, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    5. Elizabeth Blankespoor & Ed Dehaan & John Wertz & Christina Zhu, 2019. "Why Do Individual Investors Disregard Accounting Information? The Roles of Information Awareness and Acquisition Costs," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 57(1), pages 53-84, March.
    6. Blankespoor, Elizabeth, 2022. "Understanding investor interaction with firm information: A discussion of Lee and Zhong (2022)," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    7. Christensen, Hans B. & Floyd, Eric & Liu, Lisa Yao & Maffett, Mark, 2017. "The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 284-304.
    8. Olga Bogachek & Antonio De Vito & Paul Demeré & Francesco Grossetti, 2026. "Using narrative disclosures to predict tax outcomes," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 374-412, March.
    9. Essi Nousiainen & Mikko Ranta & Mika Ylinen & Marko Järvenpää, 2024. "Using machine learning and 10‐K filings to measure innovation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3211-3239, December.
    10. Farrell, Michael & Murphy, Dermot & Painter, Marcus & Zhang, Guangli, 2023. "The complexity yield puzzle: A textual analysis of municipal bond disclosures," Working Papers 338, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    11. Fengler, Matthias R. & Phan, Tri Minh, 2025. "Unveiling themes in 10-K disclosures: A new topic modeling perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Düsterhöft, Maximilian & Schiemann, Frank & Walther, Thomas, 2023. "Let’s talk about risk! Stock market effects of risk disclosure for European energy utilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Richard Frankel & Jared Jennings & Joshua Lee, 2022. "Disclosure Sentiment: Machine Learning vs. Dictionary Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5514-5532, July.
    14. Wei, Mingye & Zhang, Min & Wei, Lu & Chen, Meiqi, 2025. "IPOhelper: Mining features in registration statements for listing prediction of technological innovation companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Fengler, Matthias & Phan, Minh Tri, 2023. "A Topic Model for 10-K Management Disclosures," Economics Working Paper Series 2307, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    16. Rong Liu & Jujun Huang & Zhongju Zhang, 2023. "Tracking disclosure change trajectories for financial fraud detection," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 584-602, February.
    17. Senave, Elseline & Jans, Mieke J. & Srivastava, Rajendra P., 2023. "The application of text mining in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    18. Simon Jehnen & Joaqu'in Ordieres-Mer'e & Javier Villalba-D'iez, 2025. "FinTextSim: Enhancing Financial Text Analysis with BERTopic," Papers 2504.15683, arXiv.org.
    19. Hui, Kai Wai & Oh, Jun & She, Guoman & Yeung, P. Eric, 2025. "Contract contingencies and uncertainty: Evidence from product market contracts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2).
    20. Du Jianguo & Rauf Ibrahim & Peter Lartey Yao & Rupa Jaladi Santosh & Amponsah Clinton Kwabena, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Internal Controls in Rural Community Banks: Evidence from Ghana," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 202-218, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:685-705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.