IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v65y2021i1p166-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Trouble: Adam Smith on Profit and the Protagonists of Capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Roni Hirsch

Abstract

To better account for deepening global inequalities, political theory could greatly enhance empirical and normative work by answering a fundamental question: What is profit? When engaging political‐economic questions, however, theorists often begin thinking from the concept of private property. This, I argue, has obscured the central role of profit as an organizing category for capitalist societies since the eighteenth century. Grounded in the dynamic and uncertain processes of production and accumulation, profit displaces the proprietary citizen and subject of natural rights and gives rise to new social protagonists, who lay claim to increasingly asymmetric rewards. In particular, the article calls attention to a dangerous contemporary sensibility, which sees profit as inherently unlimited. As a viable, robust alternative, it presents Adam Smith's idea of profit as a regular, uniform rate that acts as a productive constraint on business activity, shapes character, and safeguards against risk by widely distributing its costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Roni Hirsch, 2021. "Risk and Trouble: Adam Smith on Profit and the Protagonists of Capitalism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 166-179, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:65:y:2021:i:1:p:166-179
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Smith, 2013. "Adam Smith: Left or Right?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(4), pages 784-798, December.
    2. Winch,Donald, 1996. "Riches and Poverty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521559201, Enero.
    3. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1974. "Adam Smith on Profits-Paradox Lost and Regained," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(6), pages 1177-1190, Nov.-Dec..
    4. Michael J. Gootzeit, 2006. "Finance Vs Ownership: Mill'S Two Abstinences And The Link Between Profit And Interest," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 25(1), pages 49-61, August.
    5. Ronald L. Meek, 1954. "Adam Smith And The Classical Concept Of Profit," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 1(2), pages 138-153, June.
    6. Satz, Debra, 2012. "Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199892617, Decembrie.
    7. Naples, Michele I & Aslanbeigui, Nahid, 1996. "What Does Determine the Profit Rate? The Neoclassical Theories Presented in Introductory Textbooks," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 20(1), pages 53-71, January.
    8. Philip Mirowski, 1982. "Adam Smith, Empiricism, and the Rate of Profit in Eighteenth-Century England," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 178-198, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klein, Daniel B., 2021. "Conservative liberalism: Hume, Smith, and Burke as policy liberals and polity conservatives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 861-873.
    2. Nikhil Garg & Ashish Goel & Benjamin Plaut, 2021. "Markets for public decision-making," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 755-801, May.
    3. Gilbert Faccarello, 2017. "Sæculum," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 625-639, July.
    4. Paul Oslington, 2012. "Jacob Viner on Adam Smith: Development and reception of a theological reading," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 287-301, May.
    5. Claire Pignol & Benoît Walraevens, 2017. "Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1214-1246, November.
    6. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    7. Mikko Arevuo, 2025. "Adam Smith’s Implicit Theory of Distributive Justice," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 11(1), pages 39-50, January.
    8. Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2013. "Public Debt and J.S. Mill?s Conjecture: A Note," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 93-102.
    9. Ben Huf, 2021. "Making Things Economic: Theory and Government in New South Wales, 1788–1863," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 117-125, March.
    10. Ryan Patrick Hanley, 2008. "Enlightened Nation Building: The “Science of the Legislator” in Adam Smith and Rousseau," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(2), pages 219-234, April.
    11. Mauro Boianovsky, 2013. "Humboldt and the economists on natural resources, institutions and underdevelopment (1752 to 1859)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 58-88, February.
    12. A. M. C. Waterman, 2002. "The 'Sussex School' and the history of economic thought: British Intellectual History, 1750-1950," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 452-463.
    13. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Ethonomics & the History of Economic Thought," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 223-232.
    14. Ryan Walter, 2015. "A Review of "Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe's Future", by Iain McDaniel," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 135-140, February.
    15. Morgan, Mary S., 2005. "Experimental farming and Ricardo's political arithmetic of distribution," Economic History Working Papers 22545, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    16. Diesel, Jonathon, 2021. "Adam Smith on usury: An esoteric reading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-738.
    17. A. M. C. Waterman, 2002. "Economics as Theology: Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(4), pages 907-921, April.
    18. Erik W. Matson, 2022. "What is liberal about Adam Smith's “liberal plan”?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 593-610, October.
    19. Daniela Donnini Macciò, 2015. "G.E. Moore's philosophy and Cambridge economics: Ralph Hawtrey on ethics and methodology," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 163-197, April.
    20. Jean Dellemotte & Benoît Walraevens, 2015. "Adam Smith on the subordination of wage-earners in the commercial society," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 692-727, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:65:y:2021:i:1:p:166-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.