IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/zirebs/v24y2021i2p77-104n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical approach to the influence of motivation on the dynamics of heterogeneous employees and expected average costs of efficient work

Author

Listed:
  • Talajić Mirko

    (Algebra University College, Zagreb, Croatia.)

  • Vrankić Ilko

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.)

  • Kopal Robert

    (Effectus Entrepreneurial Studies-University College, Zagreb, Croatia.)

Abstract

Motivating employees with different characteristics has a significant effect on company performance. This paper models the relationship between employer and heterogeneous employees working in pairs as a principal-agent problem. Every worker can encounter moral hazard with regard to the stimulation of the employer and the efficient work of co-workers. Employee behavior describes a reaction function based on which the equilibrium of appropriate pairs of employees and their overall effective performance is described. The employer determines the optimal stimulation that minimizes the expected average cost of effective work for each individual group of employees. The total expected average cost of efficient work of the entire company in the short run depends on the distribution of employees with different characteristics. How the attitude of employees towards work in the long run changes is described by replicative dynamics and shows that the stability of the employee population is achieved in two cases where the long-run total expected average cost of efficient work is differentiated by approximately eight percent. This paper describes a new conceptual framework for quantitative analysis of the effects of motivation on the short and long run financial results of an enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Talajić Mirko & Vrankić Ilko & Kopal Robert, 2021. "Analytical approach to the influence of motivation on the dynamics of heterogeneous employees and expected average costs of efficient work," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 24(2), pages 77-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:zirebs:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:77-104:n:1005
    DOI: 10.2478/zireb-2021-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2021-0012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/zireb-2021-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary J. Miller, 2005. "Solutions to Principal-Agent Problems in Firms," Springer Books, in: Claude Menard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 14, pages 349-370, Springer.
    2. Besanko, David & Sibley, David S, 1991. "Compensation and Transfer Pricing in a Principal-Agent Model," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(1), pages 55-68, February.
    3. Askar, S.S., 2018. "Tripoly Stackelberg game model: One leader versus two followers," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 301-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long, Jianjun & Wang, Fenglian, 2024. "Complexity of a two-stage R&D game within a cluster supply chain considering vertical R&D spillovers, effective information, and government subsidies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 606-621.
    2. Lewis, Tracy R. & Sappington, David E. M., 1995. "Using markets to allocate pollution permits and other scarce resource rights under limited information," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 431-455, July.
    3. Liuwei, Zhao & Shuai, Jin & Hongyun, Jiang, 2024. "Complex dynamics of dual oligopoly demand uncertainty under carbon emission trading mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    5. Clemens Löffler & Thomas Pfeiffer & Ulf Schiller & Joachim Wagner, 2011. "Zentralisierung, Transferpreise und spezifische Investitionen: Ein selektiver Verfahrensvergleich," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(63), pages 1-33, January.
    6. Sameh Askar & Abdulaziz Foul & Tarek Mahrous & Saleh Djemele & Emad Ibrahim, 2021. "Global and Local Analysis for a Cournot Duopoly Game with Two Different Objective Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Yeom, Sungsoo & Balachandran, Kashi R & Ronen, Joshua, 2000. "The Role of Transfer Price for Coordination and Control within a Firm," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 161-192, March.
    8. Nan Xu & Yaoqun Xu & Haiyan Zhong, 2023. "Pricing Decisions for Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Low-Carbon Input by Echelon Utilization Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Tae-Young Paik & Pradyot K. Sen, 1995. "Project Evaluation and Control in Decentralized Firms: Is Capital Rationing Always Optimal?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(8), pages 1404-1414, August.
    10. Askar, S.S., 2021. "On complex dynamics of Cournot-Bertrand game with asymmetric market information," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    11. Eric John Slof, 1999. "Transfer prices and incentive contracts in vertically-integrated divisionalized companies," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 265-286.
    12. Zhang, Ming & Wang, Guanghui & Xu, Jin & Qu, Cunquan, 2020. "Dynamic contest model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    13. Jie, Yingmo & Liu, Charles Zhechao & Li, Mingchu & Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond & Chen, Ling & Guo, Cheng, 2020. "Game theoretic resource allocation model for designing effective traffic safety solution against drunk driving," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    14. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Wu, Xue & Zhao, Yueru & Xiao, Yue, 2020. "Dynamics of Hotelling triopoly model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    15. Askar, S.S., 2022. "Nonlinear dynamic investigations and global analysis of a Cournot duopoly game with two different objectives," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Anurag Gupta & Vikram Krishnamurthy, 2021. "Principal Agent Problem as a Principled Approach to Electronic Counter-Countermeasures in Radar," Papers 2109.03546, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.
    17. Zhao, Liuwei & Jin, Shuai & Jiang, Hongyun, 2022. "Investigation of complex dynamics and chaos control of the duopoly supply chain under the mixed carbon policy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Zsuzsanna Kispál-Vitai & Yann Regnard & Klara Kövesi & Claude-André Guillotte, 2019. "Cooperative case studies from three countries: Is membership a problem or a solution in the 21 st century?," Post-Print hal-02351404, HAL.
    19. Jan Thomas Martini & Rainer Niemann & Dirk Simons, 2007. "Transfer Pricing or Formula Apportionment? Tax-Induced Distortions of Multinationals’ Investment and Production Decisions," CESifo Working Paper Series 2020, CESifo.
    20. S. S. Askar & A. Al-khedhairi, 2019. "Analysis of a Four-Firm Competition Based on a Generalized Bounded Rationality and Different Mechanisms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    employee motivation; principal-agent problem; efficient work; replicator dynamics; expected average costs of efficient work;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:zirebs:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:77-104:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.