IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v44y2022i1p61-71n8.html

The Role of Environmental Taxes in Bioeconomy Development: Cases of Lithuania and Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Miceikienė Astrida

    (Prof. dr. Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Verulidze Vazha

    (Prof. Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Georgia)

  • Kuklierius Mindaugas

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

Abstract

The bioeconomy development is an important strategy for increasing sustainability and to achieve European Green deal. Environmental taxes are one of the most important tools for the development of the bioeconomy. The research aim is to compare the role of environmental taxes in countries with different levels of economic development: Lithuania and Georgia. The authors explore the following question: whether the policy of environmental taxes can contribute to the development of bioeconomy. Research results show that aims of bioeconomy and environmental taxes are the same and contribute to solving several societal challenges. Environmental taxes in Lithuania are more important and help to development bioeconomy. Lithuania does not yet levy a carbon tax, although it participates in the EU emissions trading system. Having started to implement the Green Deal, Lithuania will have to apply carbon taxes and other environmental taxes. Environmental tax burden in Georgia is very low, but this country has the potential to develop the bioeconomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Miceikienė Astrida & Verulidze Vazha & Kuklierius Mindaugas, 2022. "The Role of Environmental Taxes in Bioeconomy Development: Cases of Lithuania and Georgia," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 61-71, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:61-71:n:8
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2022.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.07
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2022.07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Kotlán & Daniel Němec & Eva Kotlánová & Petr Skalka & Rudolf Macek & Zuzana Machová, 2021. "European Green Deal: Environmental Taxation and Its Sustainability in Conditions of High Levels of Corruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Liobikiene, Genovaite & Chen, Xueli & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2020. "The trends in bioeconomy development in the European Union: Exploiting capacity and productivity measures based on the land footprint approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Miceikienė, Astrida & Brizga, Janis, 2021. "Decomposition analysis of bioresources: Implementing a competitive and sustainable bioeconomy strategy in the Baltic Sea Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J., 2021. "Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Mr. John Norregaard & Ms. Valerie Reppelin, 2000. "Taxes and Tradable Permits As Instruments for Controlling Pollution: Theory and Practice," IMF Working Papers 2000/013, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Sanjeet Singh & Nivedita Haldar & Anindya Bhattacharya, 2018. "Offshore manufacturing contract design based on transfer price considering green tax: a bilevel programming approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 1825-1849, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Huang, Zhilin & Li, Xiang & Chen, Jialing & Zhang, Dingfeng, 2024. "Does the Three-Year Action Plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defense Battle implementation enabling the high-quality development of regional energy? A quasi-natural experiment from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    3. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:30:p:437-447 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Arcuri, Maria Cristina & GANDOLFI, GINO & PISANI, RAOUL, 2026. "Italian SMEs and access to credit: Does being “green” matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. C A Zuniga-Gonzalez & J L Quiroga-Canaviri & J J Brambila-Paz & S G Ceballos-Pérez & M M Rojas-Rojas, 2024. "Formulation of an innovative model for the bioeconomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Rigen Mo & Xian-hong Peng & Shao-bu Wang & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2024. "Knowledge Mapping of Green Economy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    9. Holz, Jana Rebecca & Saave, Anna, 2025. "Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Luqing Rong & Maozeng Xu, 2022. "Impact of Altruistic Preference and Government Subsidy on the Multinational Green Supply Chain under Dynamic Tariff," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1928-1958, February.
    11. Rupayan Pal, 2012. "Delegation And Emission Tax In A Differentiated Oligopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 80(6), pages 650-670, December.
    12. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Bo Peng & Kun Lei, 2021. "An Analytical Approach for Initial Allocation of Discharge Permits with Consideration of the Water Environmental Capacity and Industrial Technical Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Abhinashi Singh Sodhi & Sonu Bhatia & Navneet Batra, 2025. "Advances in Green Technologies and Global Circular Bioeconomy Framework for a Sustainable Society," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2991-3016, August.
    17. Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2022. "Sustainable production: The economic returns of circular economy practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2603-2617, July.
    18. Marjan ENTEKHABI, 2025. "Towards the Sustainable Organization: Challenges and Barriers to Sustainability Integration," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(2), pages 77-91, June.
    19. Lucio M. Peçanha & João J. Ferreira, 2025. "Sustainable strategies and circular economy ecosystems: A literature review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1440-1459, January.
    20. Viktoriya Prokhorova & Oleksandra Mrykhina & Orest Koleshchuk & Krystyna Slastianykova & Myroslav Harmatiy, 2023. "The holistic evaluation system of R&D results under the circular economy conditions," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(13 (126)), pages 15-23, December.
    21. Meleddu, Marta & Vecco, Marilena & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2024. "The Role of Voluntary Environmental Policies Towards Achieving Circularity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:61-71:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.