IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v6y2023i13p15-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The holistic evaluation system of R&D results under the circular economy conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Viktoriya Prokhorova

    (Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy)

  • Oleksandra Mrykhina

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Orest Koleshchuk

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Krystyna Slastianykova

    (Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy)

  • Myroslav Harmatiy

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

Abstract

The object of the research is a holistic economic evaluation system of R&D results under the circular economy conditions. The system is based on the example of an innovative product – a three-wheeled electric scooter for disabled people, developed by specialists of the Lviv Polytechnic National University (Ukraine). For this purpose, the prospects and problems of the market of the analyzed product in the context of circular economy development are studied and its market place is determined. The price indicators of the R&D result are substantiated based on the aggregation of cost, competitive and income methodological components of the holistic evaluation system, taking into account the provisions of the circular economy. Financial indicators of the project for implementing the R&D result based on the proposed holistic evaluation system are formed. The applied value of the developed holistic evaluation system is to provide the evaluator (developer, consumer, investor) with a range of price indicator values, among which one can choose the necessary, based on contractual conditions, market changes, etc. Unlike the existing methodological developments in the field of pricing for R&D results, the proposed holistic system makes it possible to aggregate the current evaluation approaches. Such aggregation is based on determining and choosing the optimum product price from a set of possible (suitable for the corresponding product, market, business, etc.). The system provides comprehensive economic evaluation, creates the basis for developing flexible management solutions and effective forecasting under the circular economy conditions

Suggested Citation

  • Viktoriya Prokhorova & Oleksandra Mrykhina & Orest Koleshchuk & Krystyna Slastianykova & Myroslav Harmatiy, 2023. "The holistic evaluation system of R&D results under the circular economy conditions," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(13 (126)), pages 15-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:6:y:2023:i:13:p:15-23
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2023.291380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/download/291380/288056
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.291380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J., 2021. "Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Nancy M. P. Bocken & Ilka Weissbrod & Maria Antikainen, 2021. "Business Model Experimentation for the Circular Economy: Definition and Approaches," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 49-81, June.
    3. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal Ashok Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2021. "Nexus of circular economy and sustainable business performance in the era of digitalization," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(3), pages 748-774, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lyailya Yessakhmetova & Gulnar Dzholdasbaeva & Ainura Saurukova & Meruert Sauranova & Aigul Alibekova, 2024. "Assessing the efficiency of the effect of innovations on the development of grain processing enterprises," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(13 (130)), pages 64-74, August.
    2. Viktoriia Prokhorova & Oleksandra Mrykhina & Orest Koleshchuk & Tetiana Demianenko, 2024. "Assessing the effectiveness of implementing immersive technologies within university sustainable development systems," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 5(13 (131)), pages 35-47, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberta De Angelis & Robert Morgan & Luigi M. De Luca, 2023. "Open strategy and dynamic capabilities: A framework for circular economy business models research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4861-4873, November.
    2. Giulia Goffetti & Daniel Böckin & Henrikke Baumann & Anne‐Marie Tillman & Thomas Zobel, 2022. "Towards sustainable business models with a novel life cycle assessment method," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2019-2035, July.
    3. Ashutosh Samadhiya & Anil Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Circular and Digital Systems in SMEs: An Assessment of the Past and Present Literature for Future Research Directions," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 114-127, December.
    4. Huang, Zhilin & Li, Xiang & Chen, Jialing & Zhang, Dingfeng, 2024. "Does the Three-Year Action Plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defense Battle implementation enabling the high-quality development of regional energy? A quasi-natural experiment from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Green Furniture Brands in the Marketing 4.0 Period: An Integrated MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Andressa Porto Castro & Ely José de Mattos, 2025. "Environmental protection versus economic growth: Determinants of individual preference," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 87-106, January.
    7. Khai Wah Khaw & Mark Camilleri & Victor Tiberius & Alhamzah Alnoor & Ali Shakir Zaidan, 2024. "Benchmarking electric power companies’ sustainability and circular economy behaviors: using a hybrid PLS-SEM and MCDM approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6561-6599, March.
    8. Jean Mansuy & Giulia Caterina Verga & Bonno Pel & Ahmed Z. Khan & Wouter Achten & Ela Callorda Fossati & Tom Bauler & Philippe Lebeau & Cathy Macharis, 2022. "Transitioning to a circular economy: Changing Business Models and Business Ecosystems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352023, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Dabija Dadiana & Năstase Carmen, 2024. "Exploring the Evolution of Sustainability Paradigms: From Linear to Circular Economy Models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 754-769.
    11. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Horst Treiblmaier & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2023. "Circular Economy Research in the COVID-19 Era: a Review and the Road Ahead," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2127-2157, December.
    12. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. C A Zuniga-Gonzalez & J L Quiroga-Canaviri & J J Brambila-Paz & S G Ceballos-Pérez & M M Rojas-Rojas, 2024. "Formulation of an innovative model for the bioeconomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Chedrak Chembessi & Christophe Beaurain & Geneviève Cloutier, 2022. "Analyzing Technical and Organizational Changes in Circular Economy (CE) Implementation with a TOE Framework: Insights from a CE Project of Kamouraska (Quebec)," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 915-936, September.
    15. Holz, Jana Rebecca & Saave, Anna, 2025. "Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Antonioli, Davide & Ghisetti, Claudia & Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Nicolli, Francesco, 2022. "The economic returns of circular economy practices," FEEM Working Papers 319761, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa & Horn, Susanna & Entsalo, Hanna & Turunen, Topi & D'Amato, Dalia & Riechers, Maraja & Närhi, Juuli, 2024. "Leverage points for sustainability transformation: Identifying past and future changes in the Finnish (circular) plastic packing system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Krishna Kumar Dadsena & Pushpesh Pant, 2023. "Analyzing the barriers in supply chain digitization: sustainable development goals perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1684-1697, December.
    20. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:6:y:2023:i:13:p:15-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.