IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v13y2018i4p1190-1209n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the interactions between the stakeholders of the circular economy ecosystem applied to the textile and apparel sector in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Staicu Daniela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, The Doctoral School for Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Pop Oana

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, The Doctoral School for Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The goal of this research is to acknowledge the elements which hinder or facilitate the transition from linear to the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector in Romania by identifying current and desired interactions among the ecosystem’s stakeholders. Two strands of literature, one on circular economy and one on the textile and apparel sector, provide the theoretical background for this research. Currently, the way we design, produce, and use clothing has drawbacks that are becoming increasingly clear. The circular economy principles have the potential to transform the way textiles are produced, consumed and disposed of. More and more social entrepreneurs are pioneering the future of the apparel industry by offering sustainable solutions to tackling systemic problems. However, their efforts have to be elevated and amplified, as such to pave the way for creating business models that allow for both economic performance and social impact. A comprehensive mapping of ongoing activities and stakeholders in the textile and apparel sector in Romania is required to understand the roadblocks to industry transformation in the context of moving toward circular economy and to implement envisioned sustainable solutions. In the paper we used a database of 27 stakeholders, developed by applying the snowball method, to investigate current and future interactions between the main actors who operate in the textile and apparel sector. To meet its research objectives, the paper employed a phenomenological research design and built upon a workshop activity. First, we designed an online survey to understand the profile and knowledge of the circular economy of the stakeholders included in our database. Second, we employed the world café method to understand in depth the level of knowledge of the actors who attended the workshop on the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector. Third, we used the structural systemic constellations method in assessing the stakeholders’ current and future desired interactions. Last, we formulated conclusions and recommendations about future research needed to deepen the understanding of the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector. Findings showed that there is a vicious circle of different actions feeding isolation and preventing collaboration among stakeholders. Also, we found that there is a lack of collaborative spaces where stakeholders can meet, connect and explore the various opportunities to collaborate, and a lack of general awareness on “circular economy and textile and apparel” and its mechanisms. The intended audiences of the research are decision-makers and practitioners in the textile and apparel sector, as well as researchers focused on the circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Staicu Daniela & Pop Oana, 2018. "Mapping the interactions between the stakeholders of the circular economy ecosystem applied to the textile and apparel sector in Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 1190-1209, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:1190-1209:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2018-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2018-0031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2018-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baltar, Fabiola & Brunet Icart, Ignasi, 2012. "Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1875, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Bianca Polenzani & Chiara Riganelli & Andrea Marchini, 2020. "Sustainability Perception of Local Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Consumers’ Attitude: A New Italian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Brandtjen, Roland, 2023. "In varietate concordia - United in diversity: An analyze of the EU environment according to its motto," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 6 (Oktober 2023), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    4. Prentice, Catherine & Nguyen, Mai, 2021. "Robotic service quality – Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Jose Ribamar Siqueira Junior & Enrique Horst & German Molina & Laura H. Gunn & Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho & Burcu Sezen & Nathalie Peña-García, 2023. "Branding in the eye of the storm: the impact of brand ethical behavior on brand commitment during the COVID-19 crisis in a South American country," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 95-115, March.
    6. Wasib Latif, 2022. "Determinants of Hotel Brand Image: A Unified Model of Customer-Based Brand Equity," International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management (IJCRMM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Savdeep Vasudeva, 2023. "Age in the Acceptance of Mobile Social Media: A Comparison of Generation Y and Baby Boomers Using UTAUT2 Model," International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Mariantonietta Fiore & Antonino Galati, 2020. "How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Tehila Refaeli & Netta Achdut, 2021. "Financial Strain and Loneliness among Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Psychosocial Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Vera Amicarelli & Caterina Tricase & Alessia Spada & Christian Bux, 2021. "Households’ Food Waste Behavior at Local Scale: A Cluster Analysis after the COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Marek Nowacki & Joanna Kowalczyk-Anioł & Yash Chawla, 2023. "Gen Z’s Attitude towards Green Image Destinations, Green Tourism and Behavioural Intention Regarding Green Holiday Destination Choice: A Study in Poland and India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Prayag, Girish & Mills, Hamish & Lee, Craig & Soscia, Isabella, 2020. "Team identification, discrete emotions, satisfaction, and event attachment: A social identity perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 373-384.
    13. Omar, Nor Asiah & Nazri, Muhamad Azrin & Ali, Mohd Helmi & Alam, Syed Shah, 2021. "The panic buying behavior of consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the influences of uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Xi Zhang & Juan Tang, 2021. "A Study of Emotional Solidarity in the Homestay Industry between Hosts and Tourists in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Liguo Lou & Lin Li & Sung-Byung Yang & Joon Koh, 2021. "Promoting User Participation of Shared Mobility in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Chinese Bike Sharing Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Marc Compte-Pujol & Jordi San Eugenio-Vela & Joan Frigola-Reig, 2018. "Key elements in defining Barcelona’s place values: the contribution of residents’ perceptions from an internal place branding perspective," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 245-259, November.
    17. Khan, Imran, 2022. "Do brands’ social media marketing activities matter? A moderation analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Meštrović, Ines Sosa & Knežević, Blaženka & Falat, Martina, 2019. "What Influences Decision Making in Online Purchasing of Books in Generation X and Y?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 367-375, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    19. Elena Druică & Călin Vâlsan & Andreea-Ionela Puiu, 2022. "Voluntary Simplicity and Green Buying Behavior: An Extended Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Selvakkumaran, Sujeetha & Ahlgren, Erik O., 2019. "Determining the factors of household energy transitions: A multi-domain study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 54-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:1190-1209:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.