IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mancon/v8y2025i2p63-68n1003.html

Inflated Expertise, Deflated Ethics? Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas of Confidence versus Transparency in Consulting

Author

Listed:
  • Sweering Eva

Abstract

This essay explores the ethical implications of expertise inflation in the management consulting industry, a practice where consultants present uncertain or speculative knowledge as definitive. Drawing on qualitative insights from an anonymized case study featuring an Associate Manager at a global consultancy, it critically evaluates this issue through consequentialism, moral disengagement theory and virtue ethics. Additionally, a comprehensive stakeholder analysis demonstrates the broader impact on clients, consulting firms, employees, and society. Acknowledging the limitations of current professional codes, such as the Dutch OOA Code of Conduct, the essay proposes practical solutions including enhanced ethical training, explicit ethical guidelines, and fostering an organizational culture of transparency and integrity.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweering Eva, 2025. "Inflated Expertise, Deflated Ethics? Navigating the Ethical Dilemmas of Confidence versus Transparency in Consulting," Management Consulting Journal, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 63-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mancon:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:63-68:n:1003
    DOI: 10.2478/mcj-2025-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mcj-2025-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mcj-2025-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Onno Bouwmeester & Tessa Elisabeth Kok, 2018. "Moral or Dirty Leadership: A Qualitative Study on How Juniors Are Managed in Dutch Consultancies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Miguel Alzola, 2008. "Character and Environment: The Status of Virtues in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 343-357, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Pirson, 2019. "A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 39-57, September.
    2. Argandoña, Antonio, 2017. "Humility and Decision Making in Companies," IESE Research Papers D/1164, IESE Business School.
    3. Ali Ünal & Danielle Warren & Chao Chen, 2012. "The Normative Foundations of Unethical Supervision in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 5-19, April.
    4. Ozgur Demirtas & A. Akdogan, 2015. "The Effect of Ethical Leadership Behavior on Ethical Climate, Turnover Intention, and Affective Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 59-67, August.
    5. Mavis Agyemang Opoku & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Psychological Safety in Ghana: Empirical Analyses of Antecedents and Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Christopher Baird & Thomas S. Calvard, 2019. "Epistemic Vices in Organizations: Knowledge, Truth, and Unethical Conduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 263-276, November.
    7. George Gotsis & Zoe Kortezi, 2010. "Ethical Considerations in Organizational Politics: Expanding the Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 497-517, June.
    8. Johan Graafland, 2023. "On Rule of Law, Civic Virtues, Trust, and Happiness," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1799-1824, August.
    9. Marco Meyer & Chun Wei Choo, 2024. "Harming by Deceit: Epistemic Malevolence and Organizational Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 439-452, January.
    10. Miguel Alzola, 2011. "The Reconciliation Project: Separation and Integration in Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 19-36, March.
    11. Andrew Abela & Ryan Shea, 2015. "Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 31-41, September.
    12. Toby Newstead & Sarah Dawkins & Rob Macklin & Angela Martin, 2020. "The Virtues Project: An Approach to Developing Good Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 605-622, December.
    13. Lisa Warenski, 2024. "Organizational Good Epistemic Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 485-500, October.
    14. Patricia Grant & Surendra Arjoon & Peter McGhee, 2018. "In Pursuit of Eudaimonia: How Virtue Ethics Captures the Self-Understandings and Roles of Corporate Directors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 389-406, December.
    15. Nufail Khan & Alison Kennedy & Jacqueline Cotton & Susan Brumby, 2019. "A Pest to Mental Health? Exploring the Link between Exposure to Agrichemicals in Farmers and Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Boudewijn Bruin, 2013. "Epistemic Virtues in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(4), pages 583-595, April.
    17. Claus Dierksmeier, 2013. "Kant on Virtue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(4), pages 597-609, April.
    18. Marco Meyer & Tong Li, 2025. "Can Good Information Prevent Misconduct? The Role of Organizational Epistemic Virtues for Ethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 489-504, March.
    19. Kim Cameron, 2011. "Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 25-35, January.
    20. Marina Balboa & Germán López-Espinosa & Antonio Rubia, 2012. "Non-linear Dynamics in Discretionary Accruals: An Analysis of Bank Loan-Loss Provisions," Faculty Working Papers 07/12, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mancon:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:63-68:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.