IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ekonom/v98y2019i1p38-59n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Lithuanian and Swedish Old Age Pension Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Medaiskis Teodoras
  • Eirošius Šarūnas

    (Lithuanian Social Research Center, Lithuania)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare Lithuanian and Swedish pension systems from the point of view of their design and performance in order to elaborate reasonable recommendations to Lithuanian pension policy based on the best Swedish experience. Swedish income, premium and guaranteed old-age pensions system are compared with the analogous Lithuanian system of the “first,” “second” pillars and the “social” pensions. The main features of the systems are discussed, and the performance of the systems, mainly from the point of view of adequacy, is compared. The differences in system design and performance are identified, and the possible reasons of these differences are examined. Special attention is paid to differences in financing and the approach to the definition of benefits. The Lithuanian pension points approach is compared to the Swedish Notional Defined Contribution (NDC) approach. Each system is analyzed, and the relevance of transforming the Lithuanian first pillar pensions into a NDC system is examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Medaiskis Teodoras & Eirošius Šarūnas, 2019. "A Comparison of Lithuanian and Swedish Old Age Pension Systems," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 98(1), pages 38-59, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ekonom:v:98:y:2019:i:1:p:38-59:n:3
    DOI: 10.15388/ekon.2019.1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2019.1.3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15388/ekon.2019.1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Palmer, 2014. "Financial Sustainability of Swedish Welfare Commitments," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 10(2), pages 253-276, August.
    2. Michael Cichon, 1999. "Notional defined‐contribution schemes: Old wine in new bottles?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 87-105, October.
    3. Teodoras Medaiskis, 2001. "Changing the Financing of the Lithuanian Pensions System," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 127-137.
    4. Edward Whitehouse, 2010. "Decomposing Notional Defined-Contribution Pensions: Experience of OECD Countries' Reforms," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 109, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John B. Williamson & Matthew Williams, 2005. "Notional Defined Contribution Accounts," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 485-506, April.
    2. Szüle, Borbála, 2013. "Demográfiai hatások és implicit hozamok kapcsolata a nyugdíjrendszerekben [The relationship of demographic effects and implicit returns in pension systems]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 703-721.
    3. Ning Wu & Jingyi Zhao & Mohammed Musah & Zhiqiang Ma & Lijuan Zhang & Yutong Zhou & Yongzheng Su & Joseph Kwasi Agyemang & Juliana Anyei Asiamah & Siqi Cao & Linnan Yao & Kaodui Li, 2023. "Do Liquidity and Capital Structure Predict Firms’ Financial Sustainability? A Panel Data Analysis on Quoted Non-Financial Establishments in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Viebrok, Holger & Himmelreicher, Ralf K., 2001. "Verteilungspolitische Aspekte vermehrter privater Altersvorsorge," Working papers of the ZeS 17/2001, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    5. World Bank & African Development Bank, 2020. "Tunisia Public Expenditure Review [Tunisie Revue des Dépenses Publiques]," World Bank Publications - Reports 33854, The World Bank Group.
    6. Alonso-García, J. & Devolder, P., 2016. "Optimal mix between pay-as-you-go and funding for DC pension schemes in an overlapping generations model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-236.
    7. Hind El-Houjjaji & Abdellah Echaoui, 2020. "Notional Defined Contribution Accounts: An Application To Morocco," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 25, pages 93-108, June.
    8. Börsch-Supan, A. & Härtl, K. & Leite, D.N., 2016. "Social Security and Public Insurance," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 781-863, Elsevier.
    9. Angelo Marano & Carlo Mazzaferro & Marcello Morciano, 2012. "The strengths and failures of incentive mechanisms in notional defined contribution pension systems," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 71(1), pages 33-70, October.
    10. Serhiy Zabolotnyy & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2019. "The Concept of Financial Sustainability Measurement: A Case of Food Companies from Northern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Peter Jarrett, 2011. "Pension Reforms in Poland and Elsewhere: the View from Paris," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 425, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Robert P. Hagemann, 2012. "Fiscal Consolidation: Part 6. What Are the Best Policy Instruments for Fiscal Consolidation?," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 937, OECD Publishing.
    13. Góra, Marek & Palmer, Edward, 2004. "Shifting Perspectives in Pensions," IZA Discussion Papers 1369, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Katharina Müller, 2003. "Die Rentenreformen in den mittel- und osteuropäischen EU-Beitrittsländern," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(4), pages 551-564.
    15. Claes Belfrage & Magnus Ryner, 2009. "Renegotiating the Swedish Social Democratic Settlement: From Pension Fund Socialism to Neoliberalization," Politics & Society, , vol. 37(2), pages 257-287, June.
    16. Carlos Vidal-Meliá & María del Carmen Boado-Penas & Francisco Navarro-Cabo, 2016. "Notional defined contribution pension schemes: why does only Sweden distribute the survivor dividend?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 200-220, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ekonom:v:98:y:2019:i:1:p:38-59:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.