IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecobur/v9y2023i1p65-93n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divest or engage? Effective paths to net zero from the U.S. perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Buks Andrew G.

    (1 Black Hills State University, College of Business and Natural Sciences, Spearfish, SD, U.S.A.)

  • Sobański Konrad

    (2 Poznań University of Economics and Business, Institute of International Business and Economics, Department of International Finance, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875, Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to critically review and evaluate two ESG-based investment strategies—divestment and engagement for alignment of investment portfolios with climate change mitigation goals of the United Nations. The article compares both approaches in terms of their effectiveness of decarbonization, using the case study method. First, the case on fossil fuels divestment by Harvard Management Company is analysed. The second case study discusses shareholder engagement endeavors by Engine No. 1 hedge fund and its investment in ExxonMobil. The findings indicate that divestment may have non-immediate impact on corporate behavior and carries political and legal retribution risks. Engagement, on the other hand, presents itself as a more plausible option as it takes less time to deploy and, therefore, can produce more immediate and impactful results. Nevertheless, both divestment and engagement can play mutually supportive roles in addressing climate change by the investment industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Buks Andrew G. & Sobański Konrad, 2023. "Divest or engage? Effective paths to net zero from the U.S. perspective," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 65-93, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecobur:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:65-93:n:5
    DOI: 10.18559/ebr.2023.1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.1.3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18559/ebr.2023.1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dieter Lüthi & Martine Le Floch & Bernhard Bereiter & Thomas Blunier & Jean-Marc Barnola & Urs Siegenthaler & Dominique Raynaud & Jean Jouzel & Hubertus Fischer & Kenji Kawamura & Thomas F. Stocker, 2008. "High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7193), pages 379-382, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blazsek, Szabolcs & Escribano, Alvaro, 2023. "Score-driven threshold ice-age models: Benchmark models for long-run climate forecasts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Frisch, L.C. & Mathis, J.T. & Kettle, N.P. & Trainor, S.F., 2015. "Gauging perceptions of ocean acidification in Alaska," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Martin L. Weitzman, 2011. "Additive Damages, Fat-Tailed Climate Dynamics, and Uncertain Discounting," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present, pages 23-46, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Andreoni, V. & Galmarini, S., 2012. "Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: A decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 682-691.
    5. Michael E. Weber & Ian Bailey & Sidney R. Hemming & Yasmina M. Martos & Brendan T. Reilly & Thomas A. Ronge & Stefanie Brachfeld & Trevor Williams & Maureen Raymo & Simon T. Belt & Lukas Smik & Hendri, 2022. "Antiphased dust deposition and productivity in the Antarctic Zone over 1.5 million years," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Granville Tunnicliffe Wilson & John Haywood & Lynda Petherick, 2022. "Modeling cycles and interdependence in irregularly sampled geophysical time series," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), March.
    7. G. M. Mkrtchyan & I. Yu. Blam & S. Yu. Kovalev & Yu. O. Tsvelodub, 2018. "Impact of Climate Change on the Subjective Well-Being of Households in Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 281-288, July.
    8. Jennifer Castle & David Hendry, 2020. "Identifying the Causal Role of CO2 during the Ice Ages," Economics Series Working Papers 898, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Proietti, Tommaso & Maddanu, Federico, 2024. "Modelling cycles in climate series: The fractional sinusoidal waveform process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(1).
    10. Enrico Sicignano & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Anna Stabile, 2019. "Quali—A Quantitative Environmental Assessment Method According to Italian CAM, for the Sustainable Design of Urban Neighbourhoods in Mediterranean Climatic Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Thomas F. STOCKER, 2015. "Implications of Climate Science for Negotiators," Working Papers P135, FERDI.
    12. Rhoda Afriyie Mensah & Vigneshwaran Shanmugam & Sreenivasan Narayanan & Nima Razavi & Adrian Ulfberg & Thomas Blanksvärd & Faez Sayahi & Peter Simonsson & Benjamin Reinke & Michael Försth & Gabriel Sa, 2021. "Biochar-Added Cementitious Materials—A Review on Mechanical, Thermal, and Environmental Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    13. , European Marine Board & Boero, Ferdinando & Cummins, Valerie & Gault, Jeremy & Huse, Geir & Philippart, Catharina & Schneider, Ralph & Besiktepe, Sukru & Boeuf, Gilles & Coll, Marta, 2019. "Navigating the Future V: Marine Science for a Sustainable Future," MarXiv vps62, Center for Open Science.
    14. James A. Menking & Sarah A. Shackleton & Thomas K. Bauska & Aron M. Buffen & Edward J. Brook & Stephen Barker & Jeffrey P. Severinghaus & Michael N. Dyonisius & Vasilii V. Petrenko, 2022. "Multiple carbon cycle mechanisms associated with the glaciation of Marine Isotope Stage 4," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. William N. Rom, 2023. "Annals of Education: Teaching Climate Change and Global Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. J. Isaac Miller, 2019. "Testing Cointegrating Relationships Using Irregular and Non‐Contemporaneous Series with an Application to Paleoclimate Data," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 936-950, November.
    17. Carmen Herrero & Antonio García-Olivares & Josep Pelegrí, 2014. "Impact of anthropogenic CO 2 on the next glacial cycle," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 283-298, January.
    18. Muhammad Heikal Hasan & Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia & M. Mofijur & I.M. Rizwanul Fattah & Fitri Handayani & Hwai Chyuan Ong & A. S. Silitonga, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on the Recent Development of Ammonia as a Renewable Energy Carrier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, June.
    19. José Edmundo de Almeida Pais & Hugo D. N. Raposo & José Torres Farinha & Antonio J. Marques Cardoso & Pedro Alexandre Marques, 2021. "Optimizing the Life Cycle of Physical Assets through an Integrated Life Cycle Assessment Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Thomas F. STOCKER, 2015. "Implications of Climate Science for Negotiators," Working Papers P135, FERDI.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    divestment; engagement; ESG; net zero transition; decarbonization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecobur:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:65-93:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.