IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaiada/v25y2021i1p82-90n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Perception of Universities’ Role in the Public Procurement Market

Author

Listed:
  • Kędra Arleta

    (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin,Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the work is to examine how the role of universities in the public procurement market and in public-private partnership is perceived by both the contracting authorities and the contractors. It was verified whether the entities participating in public procurement and public-private partnership see the need for cooperation with universities, and whether there is a link between the declared need for cooperation and the assessment of real actions taken or provided by universities. The work is based on a survey conducted between March and May 2020 among 520 institutions representing contractors and procurers in public procurement. The highest evaluation was given to the activities of public universities in the field of public procurement and public-private partnership in Lubuskie and Śląskie (opinion of procurers) and Lubelskie and Warmińsko-Mazurskie (opinion of contractors). With the use of logistic regression models it was verified that there is a positive relation between the evaluation of the university’s activities and the declared need for cooperation between the university and the analysed entity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kędra Arleta, 2021. "Evaluation of the Perception of Universities’ Role in the Public Procurement Market," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 82-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaiada:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:82-90:n:1
    DOI: 10.15611/eada.2021.1.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15611/eada.2021.1.05
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15611/eada.2021.1.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carter B. Casady & Kent Eriksson & Raymond E. Levitt & W. Richard Scott, 2020. "(Re)defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 161-183, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedrini, Giulio & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2022. "The impact of training on labour productivity in the European utilities sector: An empirical analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Dan Pan & Huan Chen & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "Determinants of Public-Private Partnership Adoption in Solid Waste Management in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Madeleine Hoeft & Marianne Pieper & Kent Eriksson & Hans-Joachim Bargstädt, 2021. "Toward Life Cycle Sustainability in Infrastructure: The Role of Automation and Robotics in PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. David Baxter & Carter B. Casady, 2020. "A Coronavirus (COVID-19) Triage Framework for (Sub)National Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-7, June.
    5. David Baxter & Carter B. Casady, 2020. "Proactive and Strategic Healthcare Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Coronavirus (Covid-19) Epoch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    6. Rehema Msulwa, 2022. "How do megaprojects influence institutional change? [‘Public–Private Partnerships: Perspectives on Purposes, Publicness, and Good Governance’]," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 302-321.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public procurement; university; public-private partnership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaiada:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:82-90:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.