IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v8y2018i1p76-100n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Priorities of the Development of EU Research Universities Based on the Analysis of Rating Indicators of World-Class Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Sitnicki Maksym W.

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Volodymyrska 60, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine)

Abstract

The object of this research is the activity of 25 leading research universities in the world. One of the most problematic issues is the in-depth analysis of the ranking indicators of world-class research universities in order to identify the priorities for the development of research universities in the European Union. The following scientific methods were used in the research: generalizations, analysis, synthesis, graphical method, and also comparison method. The study is based on data on the global university rankings in QS World University Rankings 2018 and empirical data from publicly available sources provided by the research universities. The article also systematizes the scientific views of the leading scientists of Europe and the world on the course of development of research universities and analyses the experience of implementing joint scientific projects in the EU countries. The importance of international cooperation between research universities in the fields of academic mobility and scientific research is underlined due to the fact that the global challenges and prospects that the research universities in the European Union and the world are facing are transient and create a tough competitive environment. Strengthening their leadership potential and developing entrepreneurial thinking has been revealed as a modern trend in the development of research universities. The article characterizes the 25 best world-class research universities, and the factors which have enabled them to uncover their strengths and systematize the key areas of in-depth specialization. The contrasting differences between the analysed research universities are shown, as there are significant disparities in the total number of students, foreign students and staff of research universities, showing fundamentally different approaches to the organization of educational and research processes, even within a single country. This is due to the fact that the ratio of student per staff representative significantly affects the quality of education. The author proposes the key development priorities for research universities in the European Union, which consist in intensified work on: academic reputation; the number of foreign students; reputation of employers; improvement of the ratio of the number of students to the number of staff; improvement of quality and increase in the number of citations of scientific publications by university researchers; increasing the share of the university’s participation in international educational and scientific networks of other countries and continents.

Suggested Citation

  • Sitnicki Maksym W., 2018. "Determining the Priorities of the Development of EU Research Universities Based on the Analysis of Rating Indicators of World-Class Universities," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 76-100, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:76-100:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2018-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2018-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus Schuch, 2014. "Participation of the ‘New’ EU Member States in the European Research Programmes — A Long Way to Go," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 6-17.
    2. Jutta Günther & Gresa Latifi & Judyta Lubacha-Sember & Daniel Töbelmann, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation in a German Polish Border Region in the Light of EU Enlargement," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 11(1 (eng)), pages 42-53.
    3. Eugenia Perez Vico & Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Emily Wise & Mats Benner, 2017. "Knowledge Triangle Configurations at Three Swedish Universities," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 68-82.
    4. Aleme Keikha & Reza Hoveida & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi, 2017. "The Development of an Intelligent Leadership Model for State Universities," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 11(1 (eng)), pages 66-74.
    5. Jutta Gunther & Gresa Latifi & Judyta Lubacha-Sember & Daniel Tobelmann, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation in a German-Polish Border Region in the Light of EU Enlargement," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 42-53.
    6. Aleme Keikha & Reza Hoveida & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi, 2017. "The Development of an Intelligent Leadership Model for State Universities," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 66-74.
    7. Klaus Schuch, 2014. "Participation of the ‘new’ EU member states in the European research Programmes — a long way to go," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(3 (eng)), pages 6-17.
    8. Farzaneh Eghbal & Reza Hoveida & Seyed Ali Siadat Seyadat & Hossein Samavatyan & Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian, 2017. "The Effect of Talent Management Process on the Research Performance of Faculty Members with the Mediating Role of Organizational Justice," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 83-91.
    9. Joanna Chataway & Sarah Parks & Elta Smith, 2017. "How Will Open Science Impact on University-Industry Collaboration?," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 44-53.
    10. Maximilian Unger & Wolfgang Polt, 2017. "The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation – A Conceptual Discussion," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 10-26.
    11. Mario Cervantes, 2017. "Higher Education Institutions in the Knowledge Triangle," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 27-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Golowko & Katrin Marquardt & Sonia Budz & Ulrike Stefanie Foerster-Metz (Foerster-Pastor), 2019. "German Students’ Perception of Bioeconomy – An Exploratory Study," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 138-138, February.
    2. De Silva, Muthu & Gokhberg, Leonid & Meissner, Dirk & Russo, Margherita, 2021. "Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:16-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:138 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Meissner, Dirk & Zhou, Yuan & Fischer, Bruno & Vonortas, Nicholas, 2022. "A multilayered perspective on entrepreneurial universities: looking into the dynamics of joint university-industry labs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Anatoliy Alabugin & Sergei Aliukov & Tatyana Khudyakova, 2022. "Review of Models for and Socioeconomic Approaches to the Formation of Foresight Control Mechanisms: A Genesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Fabio Donato, 2022. "I sistemi di monitoraggio delle performance nelle Knowledge Innovation Communities europee," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 45-58.
    8. Olga A. Myzrova & Tatyana V. Goryacheva & Olga V. Sysoeva & Victor V. Sysoev, 2023. "The Effect of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem of Universities on the Innovative Activity in Russian Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Olena Kolomytseva & Anna Pavlovska, 2020. "The Role Of Universities In The National Innovation System," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(1).
    10. Alejandra Manco, 2022. "A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    11. Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena, 2018. "The Role of Universities in the Knowledge Triangle Model on the Example of EIT Activities," MPRA Paper 96150, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Byeongwoo Kang & Kazuyuki Motohashi, 2020. "Academic contribution to industrial innovation by funding type," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 169-193, July.
    13. Axel Sikora & Tanya Titova-Kosturkova & Gordana Janevska & Mitko Kostov & Simona Halunga & George Suciu & Georgi Georgiev, 2023. "EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Michael J. Fell, 2019. "The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Veiga, Pedro Mota & Teixeira, Sérgio Jesus & Figueiredo, Ronnie & Fernandes, Cristina I., 2020. "Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: A public institution love triangle," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Compagnucci, Lorenzo & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2020. "The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:76-100:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.