IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v15y2024i4p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is special about the public service logic?

Author

Listed:
  • Vitaly L. Tambovtsev

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Irina A. Rozhdestvenskaya

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article addresses the issues of the public service logic (PSL), one of the avenues of studying public and municipal administration. Developing this concept will contribute to the theory and practice of providing public services in the Russian system of state and municipal government. Methodologically, the paper rests on the provisions of public administration, as well as the concepts of service-dominant logic and public service-dominant logic. It follows the principles of methodological individualism and interdisciplinary approach that allows adding the findings of the existing economic studies to our analysis. Among the research methods applied are comparison, content analysis and systematization. We have identified the following theoretical gaps that need to be bridged to develop the PSL: first, the lack of a scientifically grounded definition of “public service value” as a form of service co-production involving the seller and the buyer, and, second, determining behavioural characteristics of employees of public (non-profit) organizations rendering credence goods-related services. Thus, the PSL outlines an important research area, namely studying value co-creation mechanisms in the public sector. The research findings can be utilized to refine public policy and produce strategic documents for the development of non-profit organizations providing public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitaly L. Tambovtsev & Irina A. Rozhdestvenskaya, 2024. "What is special about the public service logic?," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 41-51, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:41-51
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-4-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/110/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2024/1668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-4-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Osborne, 2010. "Delivering Public Services: Time for a new theory?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahim Herbane, 2011. "Communications About Resilience Enhancing Activities By English Local Authorities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(7), pages 919-939, October.
    2. Michael Duijn & Jitske Van Popering-Verkerk, 2018. "Integrated Public Value Creation through Community Initiatives—Evidence from Dutch Water Management," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Annick Willem & Steffie Lucidarme, 2014. "Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 733-760, June.
    4. Charles Conteh, 2013. "Changing Trends in Regional Economic Development Policy Governance: The Case of Northern Ontario, Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1419-1437, July.
    5. Jim Broch Skarli, 2021. "Creating or Destructing Value in Use? Handling Cognitive Impairments in Co-Creation with Serious and Chronically Ill Users," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Fatima Hafsa & Nicole Darnall & Stuart Bretschneider, 2021. "Estimating the True Size of Public Procurement to Assess Sustainability Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    7. David Noble & Michael B. Charles & Robyn Keast, 2023. "Valuing intangible outcomes from the Cooperative Research Centres‐Projects program," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 47-62, March.
    8. Bin Ding & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dongxiao Gu & Fang Bian & Xuefeng Shao, 2019. "Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Arwin van Buuren & Jasper Eshuis & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "The Governance of Innovation in Dutch Regional Water Management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 679-697, May.
    10. Linda Höglund & Maria Mårtensson, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a Strategic Management Tool for Renewal—The Case of the Swedish Public Employment Service," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Immacolata Vellecco & Alessandra Mancino, 2015. "Le reti del Terzo Settore e la sfida per l?integrazione degli immigrati," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 155-172.
    12. Beth Wynter, Carlene & De Loo, Ivo, 2024. "Fiscal decentralization in the nude: Discursive struggles and the stalling of its implementation in Jamaica," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Stephen P. Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Isabel Vidal & Tony Kinder, 2014. "A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 165-172, February.
    14. Paolo Biancone & Silvana Secinaro & Valerio Brescia & Daniel Iannaci, 2019. "The Popular Financial Reporting between Theory and Evidence," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 45-56, July.
    15. Stefano Landi & Salvatore Russo, 2019. "Co-production as an interpretative framework in the creation of value in public services," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public services; co-production of services; value co-production; search goods; experience goods; credence goods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.