IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v13y2022i3p30-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Sabahattin Cetin

    (Bartin University, Bartin, Turkey)

  • Merve Davarci

    (Bartin University, Bartin, Turkey)

  • Ayhan Karakas

    (Bartin University, Bartin, Turkey)

Abstract

The spread of knowledge sharing provides advantages to organizations in developing new solutions to problems along with a broader informational infrastructure. For this reason, it is important to know the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behaviour of individuals. The study examined the impact of employees’ perceptions of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour. The theories of organizational justice, organizational trust and knowledge sharing behavior constitute the methodological framework of the research. Within the scope of the study, data were collected from 421 participants (68 managers and 353 employees) working in public and private sectors in Bartin province (Turkey), using survey method. Within the scope of the study, organizational justice is divided into four sub-dimensions (procedural, distributive, interpersonal, and informational), and the construct of trust includes two sub-dimensions – trust in the manager and in the organization as a whole. As a result of the study, while no significant relationship was found between procedural justice, distributive justice and knowledge sharing, it was found between interpersonal justice, informational justice and knowledge sharing. In addition, a positive and significant relationship was found between trust in the manager, trust in the organization and knowledge sharing behaviour. According to the findings, it is seen that organizational trust has an important role in the exhibition of knowledge sharing behaviour; as the level of trust in organizations increases, knowledge sharing behaviour is positively affected. At the same time, informational and interpersonal justice dimensions affect knowledge sharing behaviour more than distributive and procedural justice. It is emerging that organizations should give more importance to justice’s informational and interpersonal dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabahattin Cetin & Merve Davarci & Ayhan Karakas, 2022. "The impact of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 30-45, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:30-45
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/97/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2022/1025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeConinck, James B., 2010. "The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees' level of trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1349-1355, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangeeta Gupta & Poonam Devdutt & Urmila Jagadeeswari Itam, 2022. "Centrality of psychological well-being of IT employees during COVID-19 and beyond," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(4), pages 365-380, December.
    2. Sevim Gullu & Suleyman Sahin & Esra Kiziloglu, 2018. "The Effect of Internal and External Motivation on Organizational Trust: A Case Study on a Sport Organization in Turkey," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(5), pages 127-127, October.
    3. Doğru Çağlar, 2021. "The Effects of Electronic Surveillance on Job Tension, Task Performance and Organizational Trust," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143, December.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10015:y:2021:i:1:p:400-426 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jun-Chul Ha & Jun-Woo Lee, 2022. "Promoting Psychological Well-Being at Workplace through Protean Career Attitude: Dual Mediating Effect of Career Satisfaction and Career Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Las Heras, Mireia & Bosch, Maria José & Raes, Anneloes M.L., 2015. "Sequential mediation among family friendly culture and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2366-2373.
    7. Filiz Tabak & Aharon Tziner & Or Shkoler & Edna Rabenu, 2021. "The Complexity of Heavy Work Investment (HWI): A Conceptual Integration and Review of Antecedents, Dimensions, and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    9. Eko Yi Liao & Chun Hui, 2021. "A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 317-370, March.
    10. Priyanko Guchait & Ki-Joon Back, 2016. "Three country study: impact of support on employee attitudes," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7-8), pages 299-318, June.
    11. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    12. Siti Subaryani Binti Zainol & Suhaili binti Mohd Hussin & Maisarah Syazwani binti Othman, 2016. "Determinants of Employee Engagement in Hotel Industry in Malaysia. A Theoretical Mode," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9, July.
    13. Mohammad Ta'Amnha, 2020. "Institutionalizing the Employer Brand in Entrepreneurial Enterprises," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 183-193.
    14. Ruo-Yu Liang & Wei Guo & Ling-Hao Zhang & Lei Wang, 2019. "Investigating Sustained Participation in Open Design Community in China: The Antecedents of User Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Joanna Paliszkiewicz, 2012. "Managers’ Orientation on Trust and Organizational Performance," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 1(2), pages 153-161, December.
    16. Braun, Erik & Zenker, Sebastian, 2022. "In governments we trust: A two-country Brexit field experiment on perceived uncertainty as mediator for consumer decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 335-346.
    17. Yolanda Navarro-Abal & Juan Gómez-Salgado & María José López-López & José Antonio Climent-Rodríguez, 2018. "Organisational Justice, Burnout, and Engagement in University Students: A Comparison between Stressful Aspects of Labour and University Organisation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Du, Yana & Zhang, Li & Tekleab, Amanuel G., 2018. "Job strains, job control, and POS on employee performance: An interactionist perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 213-219.
    19. Tao Zhou, 2013. "Examining continuous usage of location-based services from the perspective of perceived justice," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 141-150, March.
    20. Changsok Yoo & Shinhye Kwon & Hyunsoo Na & Byenghee Chang, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Gamified Smart Tourism Applications: An Integrative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, November.
    21. Annilee M. Game & Jonathan R. Crawshaw, 2017. "A Question of Fit: Cultural and Individual Differences in Interpersonal Justice Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 279-291, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational justice; organizational trust; knowledge sharing behaviour; employees; organizational behaviour; Turkey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:30-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.