IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i3p59-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative effectiveness of high-tech and medium-tech business models: Key indicators and value sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Marina V. Evseeva

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Due to the external environment being unpredictable and dynamic, the business model becomes obsolete in a short time and its logic loses effectiveness. This seriously threatens business continuity and affects income flows. The paper develops indicators for assessing the effectiveness of business models. Methodologically, the study rests on the stakeholder theory, valuebased management and technological growth theory. The work uses mathematical methods for calculating financial and economic indicators, as well as a general scientific method of analysis. To test the metod, we examine 188 companies operating in the high-tech and medium-tech industry markets. Having systematized the theoretical positions, we conclude that the evaluation of business model effectiveness should be based on measuring the sustainability of the value created for various groups of the company stakeholders. This allowed us to propose a set of indicators of business model effectiveness built on yield spread and factor productivity. The program of empirical evaluation also included an indicator of the value of intellectual capital, computed on the basis of the company’s profitability deviation from the market norm. The author supposes that, by producing intellectual and relational rents, intangible capital helps increase the effectiveness of the business model, which is reflected in all sustainability indicators. The research results prove the analytical value to be satisfactory. In total, the high-tech market business models are more efficient. The distribution of performance indicators met the assumptions about the impact of a fragmented environment: a more homogeneous industry environment is instrumental in aligning business model performance. The findings of the study are of practical importance for business and contribute to the construction of a control system based on business model effectiveness management.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina V. Evseeva, 2020. "Comparative effectiveness of high-tech and medium-tech business models: Key indicators and value sustainability," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 59-71, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:59-71
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/85/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2020/653
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    2. Marina V. Evseeva, 2019. "The study of high-tech companies’ growth specifics applying the parametric approach," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(5), pages 108-124, December.
    3. R. Edward Freeman & S. Ramakrishna Velamuri, 2006. "A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Andrew Kakabadse & Mette Morsing (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 1, pages 9-23, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2006. "Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The Emergence of Bazaar Governance," Post-Print hal-00185026, HAL.
    5. Irina N. TKACHENKO & Aleksandr A. ZLYGOSTEV, 2018. "Assessing Stakeholders’ Contribution to Enterprise Value: The Case of the Russian Banking Sector," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 40-52, August.
    6. Andrea Beltramello & Linda Haie-Fayle & Dirk Pilat, 2013. "Why New Business Models Matter for Green Growth," OECD Green Growth Papers 2013/1, OECD Publishing.
    7. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    8. Yevgeniya V. NEKHODA & Natalia A. REDCHIKOVA & Natalia A. TYULENEVA, 2018. "Business Models of Companies: From Profit to Sustainable Development and Value Creation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 9-19, August.
    9. Marcus Linder & Mats Williander, 2017. "Circular Business Model Innovation: Inherent Uncertainties," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 182-196, February.
    10. Mateusz Lewandowski, 2016. "Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar, 2020. "Research Analysis on Emerging Technologies in Corporate Accounting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Luigi Fusco Girard & Marilena Vecco, 2021. "The “Intrinsic Value” of Cultural Heritage as Driver for Circular Human-Centered Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    4. Diaz Lopez, Fernando J. & Bastein, Ton & Tukker, Arnold, 2019. "Business Model Innovation for Resource-efficiency, Circularity and Cleaner Production: What 143 Cases Tell Us," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 20-35.
    5. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    6. Giacomo Fabietti & Francesca Trovarelli, 2016. "The role of Eco-control in the implementation of Sustainable Business Models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 141-172.
    7. Roberta De Angelis, 2022. "Circular economy business models as resilient complex adaptive systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2245-2255, July.
    8. Anna Ujwary-Gil & Natalia Regina Potoczek, 2020. "A dynamic, network and resource-based approach to the sustainable business model," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 717-733, December.
    9. Maryam Hina & Chetna Chauhan & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "Circular economy business models as pillars of sustainability: Where are we now, and where are we heading?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6182-6209, December.
    10. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    11. Wiebke Reim & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2021. "Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2745-2757, September.
    12. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    13. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    14. Puie Florina Răzvanţă, 2019. "Conceptual framework for rural business models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1130-1139, May.
    15. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    16. Souto, Jaime E., 2015. "Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 142-155.
    17. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.
    18. René Bohnsack & Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk, 2021. "The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 824-852, July.
    19. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali & Roger Strange, 2022. "Proactive and reactive views in the transition towards circular business models. A grounded study in the plastic packaging industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1073-1102, September.
    20. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    : business model; sustainability; value; stakeholders; business model performance; high-tech business model; performance indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:59-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.