IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v18y2023i3p365-394.html

Do College Applicants Respond to Changes in Sticker Prices Even When They Don't Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip B. Levine

    (Wellesley College and National Bureau of Economic Research, Department of Economics, Wellesley, MA 02481)

  • Jennifer Ma

    (College Board Washington, DC 20036)

  • Lauren C. Russell

    (University of Pennsylvania, Fels Institute of Government, Philadelphia, PA 19104)

Abstract

Do students respond to sticker prices or actual prices when applying to college? These costs differ for students eligible for financial aid. Students who do not understand this may not apply to some colleges because of the perceived high cost. We test for this form of “sticker shock” using College Board data on SAT scores sent, as a proxy for applications, to leading public institutions for students entering college in 2006–13. Some of these institutions guarantee financial aid will meet full financial need. Sticker price increases at those schools would not affect the actual cost after factoring in financial aid and should not affect decisions for those eligible for aid. We exploit the large and variable increases in sticker prices during the Great Recession of 2008. We also control for local labor market conditions to abstract from the recession's impact on individual educational decisions. We find evidence of sticker shock—students unaffected by virtue of institutional aid policies still apply less often. Using data from the National Student Clearinghouse, we also find that price increases at public flagship institutions reduce enrollment of high-achieving students, regardless of financial aid status, who often choose private colleges instead.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip B. Levine & Jennifer Ma & Lauren C. Russell, 2023. "Do College Applicants Respond to Changes in Sticker Prices Even When They Don't Matter?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 18(3), pages 365-394, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:3:p:365-394
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00372
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Zahran & Daniel Klasik, 2025. "Tuition Reduction and Student Loan Debt: Evidence from the North Carolina Promise," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(6), pages 1-38, September.
    2. Avery, Christopher & Castleman, Benjamin L. & Hurwitz, Michael & Long, Bridget Terry & Page, Lindsay C., 2021. "Digital messaging to improve college enrollment and success," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:3:p:365-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.