IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v20y2021i1p339-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rights of the notary honoress assembly approval on notary calls in the judicial process

Author

Listed:
  • Hery Zaenal Kurniawan

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Made Warka

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Slamet Suhartono

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Krisnadi Nasution

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

Abstract

This research is a normative legal research using primary and secondary legal sources. Paying attention to the condisions needed for a notary’s summons to be present in the judicial process is felt to be very important, becaus it’s an effort to obtain the truth regarding legal cases involving parties who need the services of a notary and also a notary himself related to the deed he made in his client transactions. The efforts of the Notary Honorary Council in order to guarantee the protection of the position of a Notary are increasingly seen in the provisions of Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2016 concerning the Notary Honorary Council, which is formulated: “The Regional Notary Honorary Council can accompany Notaries in the examination process before the investigatorâ€

Suggested Citation

  • Hery Zaenal Kurniawan & Made Warka & Slamet Suhartono & Krisnadi Nasution, 2021. "The rights of the notary honoress assembly approval on notary calls in the judicial process," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 339-344, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:339-344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3527/1307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3527
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Alexander Wolitzky, 2021. "A Theory of Equality Before the Law," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(636), pages 1429-1465.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10020:y:2021:i:1:p:339-344 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Liu, Ce & Ali, S. Nageeb, 2019. "Conventions and Coalitions in Repeated Games," Working Papers 2019-8, Michigan State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Ennio E. Piano, 2019. "State capacity and public choice: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 289-309, January.
    4. Kenju Kamei & Smriti Sharma & Matthew J. Walker, 2023. "Collective Sanction Enforcement: New Experimental Evidence from Two Societies," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2023-014, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    5. Kehinde Hassan Babalola & Simon Hull & Jennifer Whittal, 2023. "Assessing Peri-Urban Land Management Using 8Rs Framework of Responsible Land Management: The Case of Peri-Urban Land in Ekiti State, Nigeria," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    notary; judicial process;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:339-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.