IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v12y2017i3-4p297-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disadvantaged students and art school: the outcasts on the inside between acquiescence and contestation

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Uboldi

Abstract

This research explores the educational experiences from a qualitative perspective with in-depth interviews and focus groups with disadvantaged young pupils. The research takes place in two secondary art schools in Milan. I define art in the space of educational choices, in a Bourdieusian perspective. This type of school is an ambivalent practical lyceum. I study the meanings of this choice, the educational representations and attitudes of the students as well as the ambitions for the future. I investigate the school choice, the learner identity and the creative aspiration as classed concepts by means of cultural capital and habitus tools. The social class determines the way in which students orient themselves towards creative educational routes and professional future careers. A research of mediocrity and modesty characterises their dispositions towards school and art. The educational artistic experience is considered as a merely autotelic practice without value and relevance to their life. The disadvantaged young students are incomplete neo-liberal subjectivities and their life projects are undefined in terms of tools, aims and trajectories. In sum, I examine the role of secondary art school to reproduce the social disadvantages in terms of educational and professional aspirations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Uboldi, 2017. "Disadvantaged students and art school: the outcasts on the inside between acquiescence and contestation," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3-4), pages 297-315, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:12:y:2017:i:3-4:p:297-315
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2017.1384563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2017.1384563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2017.1384563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abbing, Hans, 2002. "Why Are Artists Poor?," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9789053565650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Seaman, 2017. "¿Qué está en juego al optar entre distintas formas de apoyo para el sector cultural?," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(146), pages 121-162.
    2. Roberta Comunian & Alessandra Faggian & Sarah Jewell, 2014. "Embedding Arts and Humanities in the Creative Economy: The Role of Graduates in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(3), pages 426-450, June.
    3. Ruth Towse, 2011. "Creativity," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Lasse Steiner & Lucian Schneider, 2012. "The Happy Artist?: An Empirical Application of the Work-Preference Model," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 430, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Pavla Petrová, 2019. "Cultural Enterpreneurship Illustrated on the Non-Profit Arts Sector in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 56-74.
    6. Borowiecki, Karol Jan & Kavetsos, Georgios, 2015. "In fatal pursuit of immortal fame: Peer competition and early mortality of music composers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 30-42.
    7. Alessia Crotta & Filip Vermeylen, 2020. "Does nudity sell? An econometric analysis of the value of female nudity in Modigliani portraits," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-02-2020, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Dec 2020.
    8. David Chafe & Lisa Kaida, 2020. "Harmonic Dissonance: Coping with Employment Precarity among Professional Musicians in St John’s, Canada," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 407-423, June.
    9. Lasse Steiner & Lucian Schneider, 2013. "The happy artist: an empirical application of the work-preference model," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 37(2), pages 225-246, May.
    10. Thom, Marco, 2016. "Fine artists' entrepreneurial business environment," Working Papers 06/16, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    11. Cecile Wetzels, 2008. "Are workers in the cultural industries paid differently?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 59-77, March.
    12. Haak, Carroll, 2006. "Von Künstlern lernen: Mehrfachbeschäftigung, Bildung und Einkommen auf den Arbeitsmärkten von Künstlern," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2006-123, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Productivity Commission, 2009. "Restrictions on the Parallel Importation of Books," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 34.
    14. Lasse Steiner & Lucian Schneider, 2011. "The happy artist? An empirical application of the work-preference model," ECON - Working Papers 037, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    15. Ruth Towse, 2010. "Creativity, Copyright and the Creative Industries Paradigm," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 461-478, August.
    16. Hendrik Sonnabend, 2016. "Fairness constraints on profit-seeking: evidence from the German club concert industry," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 40(4), pages 529-545, November.
    17. Lauren Haaften-Schick & Amy Whitaker, 2022. "From the Artist’s Contract to the blockchain ledger: new forms of artists’ funding using equity and resale royalties," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 287-315, June.
    18. Andrej Srakar, 2017. "Prevalence of Diseases and Health Care Utilization ofthe Self-Employed Artists and TheirEmpirical Determinants: Evidence From a Slovenian Survey," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-08-2017, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Sep 2017.
    19. Andrea Baldin & Trine Bille, 2021. "Who is an artist? Heterogeneity and professionalism among visual artists," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 527-556, December.
    20. Ana Machado & Alexandre Rabelo & Arthur Moreira, 2014. "Specificities of the artistic cultural labor market in Brazilian metropolitan regions between 2002 and 2010," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(3), pages 237-251, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:12:y:2017:i:3-4:p:297-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.