IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A Policy Response to Regional Disparities in the Supply of Risk Capital to New Technology-based Firms in the European Union: The European Seed Capital Fund Scheme

Listed author(s):
  • Gordon Murray
Registered author(s):

    MURRAY G. C. (1998) A policy response to regional disparities in the supply of risk capital to new technology-based firms in the European Union: the European Seed Capital Fund Scheme, Reg. Studies 32 , 405-419. The European Seed Capital Fund Pilot Scheme (1988-95) was a European Commission response to two primary concerns that: (1) private venture capital firms in Europe were increasingly retreating from the financing and support of start-up, early-stage and, particularly, technologybased enterprises; and (2) existing spatial concentrations in the supply of venture capital prejudiced the formation of new, innovative businesses in less economically developed regions of the Union. This paper presents the updated results of a study of this Scheme in 1992. The comparative internal dynamics of the Seed Funds are explored. The Scheme realized its goal of encouraging private investment into innovative, technology-based young firms. However, the continued ability of the funds to meet longer-term commercial and/or regional developmental objectives is questioned given scale-related problems of economic viability. MURRAY G. C. (1998) La reponse politique aux ecarts regionaux de l'offre de capital-risque aux entreprises basees sur les nouvelles technologies et situees au sein de l'Union europeenne: le programme en faveur d'un fonds europeen de capitaux de lancement, Reg. Studies 32 , 405-419. Le programme en faveur d'un fonds europeen de capitaux de lancement (European Seed Capital Fund Pilot Scheme 1988-95), a ete une reponse de la part de la Commission europeenne a deux soucis primordiaux. Primo, en Europe les entreprises de capital-risque privees se retiraient de plus en plus du financement et du soutien des pepinieres d'entreprises, des entreprises dans les phases initiales de developpement et des entreprises basees sur les nouvelles technologies. Secundo, Les concentrations geographiques existantes de l'offre de capital-risque entravaient la creation de nouvelles entreprises innovatrices dans les zones defavorisees de l'Union. Cet article cherche a presenter les resultats mis a jour d'une etude de ce programme faite en 1992. On examine la dynamique interne comparative du fonds. Le programme a reussi a encourager l'investissement prive dans de nouvelles entreprises innovatrices, basees sur les nouvelles technologies. Cependant, on remet en question la capacite des fonds a repondre aux objectifs commerciaux et/ou regionaux a plus long terme etant donne le probleme de leur viabilite economique lie a la notion d'echelle. MURRAY G. C. (1998) Eine grundsatzliche Antwort auf regionale Ungleichheiten im Angebot von Risikokapital fur auf neuer Technologie aufgebaute Firmen in der Europaischen Union: das europaische Saatkornkapitalfond Project, Reg. Studies 32 , 405-419. Das europaische Saatkornkapitalfond Versuchsprojekt (1988-1995)stellte eine Antwort der europaischen Kommission auaf zwei grundlegende Anliegen dar: (1) private Risikokapitalfirmen in Europa zogen sich zunehmend von der Finanzierung und Unterstutzung neu gegrundeter, in Anfangen begriffener und vorallem von auf Technologie aufgebauten Unternehmen zuruck, und (2) bestehende raumliche Konzentrationen beim Aufbringen von Risikokapital beeintrachtigten die Bildung neuer, innovativer Geschaftsunternehmungen in weniger entwikkelten Gebieten der Union. Dieser Aufsatz stellt die auf den neuesten Stand gebrachten Ergebnisse einer Studie dieses Projektes vom Jahre 1992 vor. Die vergleichsweise interne Dynamik der Saatkornfonds wird untersucht. Das Projekt verwirklichte das ihm gesteckte Ziel, private Investierungen in innovativen, auf Technologie aufgebauten jungen Firmen zu ermutigen. Die anhaltende Fahigkeit des Fonds, das Kapital fur langerfristige kommerzielle und/oder regionale Entwicklungsobjekte aufzubringen, wird jedoch angesichts der Grossenordnung bezogenen Probleme wirtschaftlicher Realisierbarkeit wegen in Frage gestellt.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

    Volume (Year): 32 (1998)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 405-419

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:5:p:405-419
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409850116817
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Macmillan, Ian C. & Zemann, Lauriann & Subbanarasimha, P. N., 1987. "Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 123-137.
    2. Hustedde, Ronald J. & Pulver, Glen C., 1992. "Factors affecting equity capital acquisition: The demand side," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 363-374, September.
    3. N/A, 1991. "Appraisal," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 138(1), pages 3-5, November.
    4. Gorman, Michael & Sahlman, William A., 1989. "What do venture capitalists do?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 231-248, July.
    5. Macmillan, Ian C. & Siegel, Robin & Narasimha, P. N. Subba, 1985. "Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 119-128.
    6. Hall, John & Hofer, Charles W., 1993. "Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 25-42, January.
    7. Sapienza, Harry J., 1992. "When do venture capitalists add value?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 9-27, January.
    8. D E Keeble, 1989. "High-technology industry and regional development in Britain: the case of the Cambridge phenomenon," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 7(2), pages 153-172, April.
    9. D E Keeble, 1989. "High-Technology Industry and Regional Development in Britain: The Case of the Cambridge Phenomenon," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 7(2), pages 153-172, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:5:p:405-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.