IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v10y2010i6p617-627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio sensitivity to changes in the maximum and the maximum drawdown

Author

Listed:
  • Libor Pospisil
  • Jan Vecer

Abstract

In this article, we define new 'Greeks' for financial derivatives: sensitivities to the running maximum and the running maximum drawdown of an underlying asset. Some types of portfolios, such as the net asset value of a hedge fund or performance fees, are sensitive to these parameters. In order to illustrate the concept of the new 'Greeks', we derive probabilistic representations of sensitivities for two classes of financial contracts: forwards on the maximum drawdown and lookback options. These results allow us to interpret the delta-hedge of the contracts in a novel way.

Suggested Citation

  • Libor Pospisil & Jan Vecer, 2010. "Portfolio sensitivity to changes in the maximum and the maximum drawdown," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 617-627.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:10:y:2010:i:6:p:617-627
    DOI: 10.1080/14697680903008751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14697680903008751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697680903008751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David G. Hobson, 1998. "Robust hedging of the lookback option," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 329-347.
    2. Goldman, M Barry & Sosin, Howard B & Gatto, Mary Ann, 1979. "Path Dependent Options: "Buy at the Low, Sell at the High"," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(5), pages 1111-1127, December.
    3. Eberlein, Ernst & Papapantoleon, Antonis, 2005. "Equivalence of floating and fixed strike Asian and lookback options," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 31-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun-Yong Choi & Ji-Hun Yoon & Junkee Jeon, 2019. "Pricing of Fixed-Strike Lookback Options on Assets with Default Risk," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, January.
    2. San‐Lin Chung & Yi‐Ta Huang & Pai‐Ta Shih & Jr‐Yan Wang, 2019. "Semistatic hedging and pricing American floating strike lookback options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 418-434, April.
    3. Jérôme Detemple, 1999. "American Options: Symmetry Properties," CIRANO Working Papers 99s-45, CIRANO.
    4. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.
    5. Kristoffer Glover & Hardy Hulley & Goran Peskir, 2011. "Three-Dimensional Brownian Motion and the Golden Ratio Rule," Research Paper Series 295, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    6. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Matt Davison & Yichen Zhu, 2022. "Derivatives-based portfolio decisions: an expected utility insight," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 217-246, June.
    7. Leunglung Chan & Song-Ping Zhu, 2014. "An exact and explicit formula for pricing lookback options with regime switching," Papers 1407.4864, arXiv.org.
    8. Alexander M. G. Cox & Christoph Hoeggerl, 2013. "Model-independent no-arbitrage conditions on American put options," Papers 1301.5467, arXiv.org.
    9. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    10. Sergey Badikov & Antoine Jacquier & Daphne Qing Liu & Patrick Roome, 2016. "No-arbitrage bounds for the forward smile given marginals," Papers 1603.06389, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    11. Meriam El Mansour & Emmanuel Lepinette, 2023. "Robust discrete-time super-hedging strategies under AIP condition and under price uncertainty," Papers 2311.08847, arXiv.org.
    12. Benjamin Marcus & Chris K. Anderson, 2006. "Online Low-Price Guarantees---A Real Options Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1041-1050, December.
    13. Yang, Zhaoqiang, 2020. "Default probability of American lookback option in a mixed jump-diffusion model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    14. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Prömel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2019. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 697-728, July.
    15. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2023. "Entropy martingale optimal transport and nonlinear pricing–hedging duality," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 255-304, April.
    16. Vicky Henderson & David Hobson, 2001. "Passport options with stochastic volatility," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 97-118.
    17. David Hobson & Anthony Neuberger, 2016. "On the value of being American," Papers 1604.02269, arXiv.org.
    18. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    19. Ariel Neufeld & Antonis Papapantoleon & Qikun Xiang, 2020. "Model-free bounds for multi-asset options using option-implied information and their exact computation," Papers 2006.14288, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    20. Zia Ur Rehman & Noor Muhammad & Bilal Sarwar & Muhammad Asif Raz, 2019. "Impact of risk management strategies on the credit risk faced by commercial banks of Balochistan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:10:y:2010:i:6:p:617-627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.