IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v38y2011i4p415-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn R. van der Horst
  • Larissa M. van der Lugt

Abstract

Hinterland accessibility is one of the main determinants in port competition. Improving hinterland accessibility is a complex process in which many actors are involved and many factors play a role. It requires coordination mechanisms beyond the price mechanism; conditions of complexity can become such that assistance is needed from other coordination mechanisms, such as introduction of incentives, creation of an interfirm alliance, changing scope, and creating collective action. The goal of this paper is to gain a better understanding on coordination in hinterland chains. Based on the insights of Transaction Cost Economics, a set of variables is explicated in order to understand when, by whom, and under which conditions and situations coordination arrangements are chosen. The variables can be divided into variables related to the complexity of the coordination problem and variables related to the coordination arrangement. The variables are used in an empirical analysis of coordination arrangements in hinterland transport from and to the port of Rotterdam. This analysis provides insight into the patterns and conditions of the emergence of different coordination arrangements that improve hinterland accessibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn R. van der Horst & Larissa M. van der Lugt, 2011. "Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 415-435, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:38:y:2011:i:4:p:415-435
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2011.588257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2011.588257
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2011.588257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter W. de Langen, 2008. "Ensuring Hinterland Access The Role of Port Authorities," OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers 2008/11, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Gleser & Ralf Elbert & Hongjun Wu, 2023. "Port Competition through Hinterland Connectivity—A Case Study for Potential Hinterland Scope in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) Regarding an Environmental Policy Measure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Annabelle Duval & Jean-Baptiste Bahers, 2023. "Flows as Makers and Breakers of Port-Territory Metabolic Relations: The Case of the Loire Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 319-329.
    3. Caterina Caramuta & Giovanni Longo & Teresa Montrone & Carlo Poloni, 2021. "An Integrated Methodology for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Port Railway Capacity: The Case Study of the Port of Trieste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    5. Volkan Gumuskaya & Willem Jaarsveld & Remco Dijkman & Paul Grefen & Albert Veenstra, 2020. "A framework for modelling and analysing coordination challenges in hinterland transport systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 124-145, March.
    6. Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin & Yang, Jinglei, 2016. "Port connectivity in a logistic network: The case of Bohai Bay, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-354.
    7. Tessmann, R. & Elbert, R., 2022. "Multi sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132320, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Eleftherios Sdoukopoulos & Maria Boile, 2021. "Strengthening the Collaborative Environment in Port-Hinterland Corridor Management Initiatives: A Value System Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Ralf Elbert & Holger Pontow & Alexander Benlian, 2017. "The role of inter-organizational information systems in maritime transport chains," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(2), pages 157-173, May.
    10. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.
    11. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    12. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    13. Li, Le & Negenborn, Rudy R. & De Schutter, Bart, 2017. "Distributed model predictive control for cooperative synchromodal freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-260.
    14. Christopher B. Clott & Bruce C. Hartman & Robert Cannizzaro, 2018. "Standard setting and carrier differentiation at seaports," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    2. Brooks, Mary R. & van der Lugt, Larissa M., 2010. "Transatlantic Port Issues," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 49(3).
    3. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    6. van der Lugt, Larissa M. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & van den Berg, Roy, 2014. "Co-evolution of the strategic reorientation of port actors: insights from the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Barcelona," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 197-209.
    7. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:38:y:2011:i:4:p:415-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.