IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaaa/2008-11-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ensuring Hinterland Access The Role of Port Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Peter W. de Langen

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

n this paper, it is argued that port authorities can actively contribute to better hinterland access. Different types of involvement of the port authority are discussed, as well as reasons for such involvement. The analysis is explorative and aims to provide a basis for further discussion. The analysis applies to landlord port authorities (PAs) with public goals. Landlord port authorities have become more autonomous and take the initiative for expansion and redevelopment of port infrastructure. The activities of PAs can be classified in four broad categories: traffic management, customer management, area management and stakeholder management. PAs traditionally act as landlords but increasingly operate ‘beyond the landlord’ model. The main argument for a more active involvement of the PA is the fact that coordination in clusters as well as transport chains does not always emerge spontaneously, for various reasons. More coordination can lead to more efficient supply chains and more competitive ports. Consequently, PAs have incentives to invest to improve coordination in port clusters and supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter W. de Langen, 2008. "Ensuring Hinterland Access The Role of Port Authorities," OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers 2008/11, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaaa:2008/11-en
    DOI: 10.1787/235364721737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/235364721737
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/235364721737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martijn R. van der Horst & Larissa M. van der Lugt, 2011. "Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 415-435, March.
    2. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Brooks, Mary R. & van der Lugt, Larissa M., 2010. "Transatlantic Port Issues," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 49(3).
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    5. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    6. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. van der Lugt, Larissa M. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & van den Berg, Roy, 2014. "Co-evolution of the strategic reorientation of port actors: insights from the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Barcelona," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 197-209.
    8. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaaa:2008/11-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.