IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v51y2015i11p1429-1443.html

Barriers to Participation: Exploring Gender in Peru's Participatory Budget Process

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie L. McNulty

Abstract

As citizens increasingly work to improve transparency and governance, participatory budgeting (PB) has emerged in thousands of cities. Advocates argue that PB can serve to educate citizens, increase transparency, and even improve living standards in the cities and towns that implement this form of public finance. However, we still know very little about how inclusive these processes are. This article asks: first, are participatory budgeting processes engaging women and men equally? Second, if gender exclusion is taking place, why? Finally, what can the development community do to begin to eradicate exclusion? Through the case study of participatory budgeting in Peru, the article documents that participatory budgeting in this country is not inclusive. Economic barriers, combined with the fact that women are expected to take on most domestic duties, make it very hard for women to actually attend meetings, especially in rural areas where poverty and patriarchy are more pronounced. Additionally, the weakness of women's organizations prevents many organizations from registering to attend these processes. The article concludes with recommendations for advocates who wish to rectify these challenges through concrete interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie L. McNulty, 2015. "Barriers to Participation: Exploring Gender in Peru's Participatory Budget Process," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1429-1443, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:51:y:2015:i:11:p:1429-1443
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1010155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2015.1010155
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2015.1010155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:11859 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:idb:brikps:37198 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Vivian Roza & Beatriz Llanos & Gisela Garzón de la Roza, 2010. "Partidos políticos y paridad: La ecuación pendiente," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 37198, February.
    4. Roza, Vivian & Llanos, Beatriz & Garzón de la Roza, Gisela, 2010. "Partidos políticos y paridad: La ecuación pendiente," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olejniczak Jarosław & Bednarska-Olejniczak Dorota, 2024. "Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(3), pages 186-198.
    2. LeRoux-Rutledge, Emily, 2020. "Re-evaluating the “traditional”: How the South Sudanese use established gender narratives to advance women’s equality and empowerment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Libuše Svobodová, 2020. "How a Participatory Budget Can Support Sustainable Rural Development—Lessons From Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:51:y:2015:i:11:p:1429-1443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.