IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v28y2018i1p135-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prehistories of Neoliberal Housing Policies in Italy and Spain and Their Reification in Times of Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Cesare Di Feliciantonio
  • Manuel B. Aalbers

Abstract

In this article we analyze the historical roots of neoliberal housing policies, mottos, and principles in Italy and Spain, two countries with a Mediterranean welfare regime, showing how they are embedded in the twentieth-century fascist–dictatorial regimes of Mussolini and Franco. To stimulate economic growth in a situation of autarchy, both regimes saw the construction sector and the promotion of homeownership as keys to fuel the accumulation process while believing this guaranteed social order. After acknowledging these long-standing roots, we show how the current phase of neoliberalism, characterized by severe austerity policies, relies on similar principles, the main reforms approved in both countries proceeding mainly toward cuts to service provisions and resources, whereas the promotion of homeownership remains unchallenged.

Suggested Citation

  • Cesare Di Feliciantonio & Manuel B. Aalbers, 2018. "The Prehistories of Neoliberal Housing Policies in Italy and Spain and Their Reification in Times of Crisis," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 135-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:28:y:2018:i:1:p:135-151
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1276468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2016.1276468
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2016.1276468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Stedman Jones, 2012. "Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9827.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sónia Alves & Alda Botelho Azevedo & Luís Mendes & Katielle Silva, 2023. "Urban Regeneration, Rent Regulation and the Private Rental Sector in Portugal: A Case Study on Inner-City Lisbon’s Social Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Ivis García, 2019. "Historically Illustrating the Shift to Neoliberalism in the U.S. Home Mortgage Market," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl & Florian Müller, 2023. "Government-Made House Price Bubbles? Austerity, Homeownership, Rental, and Credit Liberalization Policies and the “Irrational Exuberance” on Housing Markets," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2061, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Cesare Di Feliciantonio & Cian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Struggles over property in the ‘post-political’ era: Notes on the political from Rome and Dublin," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 195-213, March.
    5. Matthew C. Record, 2021. "Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Michael Byrne & Michelle Norris, 2022. "Housing market financialization, neoliberalism and everyday retrenchment of social housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 182-198, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Innset, Ola, 2023. "Dual Argument, Double Truth: On the continued importance of the state in neoliberal thought," SocArXiv kyvdm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Fontaine, Philippe & Pooley, Jefferson, 2020. "Introduction: Whose Social Problems?," SocArXiv w59f3, Center for Open Science.
    3. Guler Aras & Paul F. Williams, 2022. "Integrated Reporting and Integrated Thinking: Proposing a Reporting Model That Induces More Responsible Use of Corporate Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Paing, Win Min & Han, Phyu Phyu & Ota, Masahiko & Fujiwara, Takahiro, 2023. "The state-private hybrid forest policy in Myanmar: The impact of neoliberalism on the forestry sector after the 1990s," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Jean-Michel Servet & Bruno Tinel, 2020. "The behavioral and neoliberal foundations of randomizations," Post-Print halshs-02562758, HAL.
    6. Stephan Schulmeister, 2018. "From Prosperity into the Crisis and Back. On the Role of Economic Theories in the Long Cycle," WIFO Working Papers 571, WIFO.
    7. Styhre Alexander, 2018. "The Making of the Shareholder Primacy Governance Model: Price Theory, the Law and Economics School, and Corporate Law Retrenchment Advocacy," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Andrew Farrant, 2019. "What Should (Knightian) Economists Do? James M. Buchanan's 1980 Visit to Chile," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(3), pages 691-714, January.
    9. Pühringer, Stephan & Griesser, Markus, 2017. "From the "planning euphoria" to the "bitter economic truth": The transmission of economic ideas into German labour market policies in the 1960s and 2000s," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-30, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    10. C. J. Polychroniou, 2013. "Toward a Post-Keynesian Political Economy for the 21st Century: General Reflections and Considerations on an Era Ripe for Change," Economics Policy Note Archive 13-02, Levy Economics Institute.
    11. João Márcio Mendes Pereira, 2020. "The World Bank's ‘Assault on Poverty’ as a Political Question (1968–81)," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(6), pages 1401-1428, November.
    12. Ötsch, Walter & Pühringer, Stephan, 2019. "The anti-democratic logic of right-wing populism and neoliberal market-fundamentalism," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-48, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    13. Mathieu Segers, 2019. "Eclipsing Atlantis: Trans‐Atlantic Multilateralism in Trade and Monetary Affairs as a Pre‐History to the Genesis of Social Market Europe (1942–1950)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 60-76, January.
    14. Vlad Tarko & Ryan Safner, 2022. "International regulatory diversity over 50 years: political entrepreneurship within fiscal constraints," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 79-108, October.
    15. Williams, Paul F., 2017. "Jumping on the wrong bus: Reflections on a long, strange journey," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 76-85.
    16. Stephan Puehringer & Georg Wolfmayr & Carina Altreiter & Claudius Graebner & Ana Rogojanu, 2020. "Theorizing Competition. An interdisciplinary approach to the genesis of a contested concept," ICAE Working Papers 117, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    17. Jean-Michel Servet & Bruno Tinel, 2020. "The behavioral and neoliberal foundations of randomizations," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02562758, HAL.
    18. Karen Horn, 2020. "Richard E. Wagner (Ed.): James M. Buchanan—A theorist of political economy and social philosophy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 259-265, June.
    19. Antonio Magliulo, 2018. "The reception of Austrian economics in Italy," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 4(1), pages 65-86, April.
    20. Alexander Lord & Yiquan Gu, 2019. "Can the market be tamed? A thought experiment on the value(s) of planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 11-24, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:28:y:2018:i:1:p:135-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.