IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v22y2016i4p82-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered Nature of Poverty in the EU: Individualized versus Collective Poverty Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Marcella Corsi
  • Fabrizio Botti
  • Carlo D'Ippoliti

Abstract

Due to the adoption of the household as a unit of analysis, researchers have failed to identify accurate measures of women's income poverty. This study proposes an individualized measure of European poverty to highlight gender differences in the economic crisis. Employing data from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) for the period 2007–12, it compares the household-based at-risk-of-poverty rate (ARPR) and the individualized financial dependency rate (FDR). The study shows that the gender gap in poverty in Europe is considerably higher when computed through FDR. Indeed, since the ARPR constitutes a proxy of the household's average conditions, it levels down gender inequalities within the household and also variations in individuals’ incomes over time. Only more detailed data collection on intrahousehold resource sharing will possibly allow the development of more precise and realistic indicators of women's and men's risks of poverty and financial dependency.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcella Corsi & Fabrizio Botti & Carlo D'Ippoliti, 2016. "The Gendered Nature of Poverty in the EU: Individualized versus Collective Poverty Measures," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 82-100, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:22:y:2016:i:4:p:82-100
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2016.1146408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2016.1146408
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2016.1146408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Eydoux & Antoine Math & Hélène Périvier, 2014. "European labour markets in times of crisis. A gender perspective," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 7-14.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4vmtkid6a69efp76sn4f2dmjvk is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucía Gorjón García & Antonio Villar, 2019. "The Minimum Income Scheme as a poverty reduction mechanism:the case of the Basque Country," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2019-10, FEDEA.
    2. Romane Frecheville-Faucon & Magali Jaoul-Grammare & Faustine Perrin, 2023. "Gender Inequalities: Progress and Challenges," Working Papers of BETA 2023-32, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Elena Grinza & Francesco Devicienti & Mariacristina Rossi & Davide Vannoni, 2017. "How Entry into Parenthood Shapes Gender Role Attitudes: New Evidence from Longitudinal UK Data," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 511, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    4. Anne-Cathérine Guio & Karel Van den Bosch, 2020. "Deprivation of Women and Men Living in a Couple: Sharing or Unequal Division?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 958-984, December.
    5. Irène Berthonnet, 2023. "Where Exactly Does the Sexist Bias in the Official Measurement of Monetary Poverty in Europe Come From?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 132-146, March.
    6. Romane Frecheville-Faucon & Magali Jaoul-Grammare & Faustine Perrin, 2023. "Gender Inequalities: Progress and Challenges," Working Papers 12-23, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    7. Christina Siegert, 2021. "Erwerbsarmut in Österreich aus Geschlechterperspektive," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 47(4), pages 511-535.
    8. Martina Hutton & Canan Corus & Joshua Dorsey & Elizabeth Minton & Caroline Roux & Christopher P. Blocker & Jonathan Z. Zhang, 2022. "Getting real about consumer poverty: Deep processes for transformative action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1332-1355, September.
    9. Irène Berthonnet, 2021. "Where Exactly Does the Sexist Bias in the Official Measurement of Monetary Poverty in Europe Come From?," Post-Print halshs-03176142, HAL.
    10. Emanuele Felice & Josep Pujol Andreu & Carlo D'Ippoliti, 2016. "GDP and life expectancy in Italy and Spain over the long run: A time-series approach," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(28), pages 813-866.
    11. Lara Maestripieri, 2018. "A Job of One’s Own. Does Women’s Labor Market Participation Influence the Economic Insecurity of Households?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosalia Castellano & Antonella Rocca, 2017. "The dynamic of the gender gap in the European labour market in the years of economic crisis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1337-1357, May.
    2. Adalgiso Amendola & Roberto Dell’Anno & Lavinia Parisi, 2020. "How did the Great Recession Affect Gender Disparity in Europe? An Analysis by a Multidimensional Deprivation Approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(26), pages 2780-2794, May.
    3. Marina Zannella & Alessandra De Rose, 2019. "Italians’ use of time during the economic crisis: implications for the gender division of labour," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 17(1), pages 141-162.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:22:y:2016:i:4:p:82-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.