IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v17y1999i2p139-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics in tendering: a survey of Australian opinion and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ray
  • John Hornibrook
  • Martin Skitmore
  • Anna Zarkada-Fraser

Abstract

The main issues in the philosophical foundations of ethics and tendering ethics are outlined, and an introduction is provided to the Australian codes of tendering practice. A questionnaire survey is then described which sought to ascertain the extent to which ethical behaviour in tendering is supported and practiced in Australia. The results of the survey indicate that most companies support the use of codes of tendering; defend the right of withdrawal of tenders; disapprove of bid shopping, cover pricing and union involvement in the tendering process, and support the principals' right to know what is included in a tender as well as the self-regulation of the tendering codes. It is also shown that most companies have developed, and follow, idiosyncratic ethical guidelines that are independent of, and often contrary to, the nationally prescribed codes. The conclusions recommend a need for the development of a theoretical frame of reference that can be tested through a more detailed empirical approach to the development of future ethical prescriptions in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ray & John Hornibrook & Martin Skitmore & Anna Zarkada-Fraser, 1999. "Ethics in tendering: a survey of Australian opinion and practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 139-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:139-153
    DOI: 10.1080/014461999371646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014461999371646
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ethics; Tendering; Codes; Restrictive Practices;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:139-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.