IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v67y2015i1p84-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Dufy

Abstract

In the aftermath of Russia's accession process to the World Trade Organization in 2011, an extensive public debate emerged on the modernisation of the economy. Enhanced state intervention and authoritarian modernisation were promoted as suitable options for Russia by opponents to neo-liberalism. Medvedev's liberal alternative was promptly discredited in the course of the political competition with Putin. Using ethnographic work, the present essay identifies three models of economic reform and investigates the way they have been considered by professionals in business and trade. The first model, the strategic model, contrary to conventional wisdom, is discussed in the discourse of business actors in terms of economic patriotism, public intervention and state strategic planning; second, the market model is viewed by others as a fully legitimate model; and a third model, the innovation model, combines narratives of efficiency and autonomy, which is attractive but fragile. Beyond their differences, these views have in common a concern to display the relationship of the business sector to the political sphere as a key variable for economic reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Dufy, 2015. "Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(1), pages 84-101, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:67:y:2015:i:1:p:84-101
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.988998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2014.988998
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2014.988998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Mackenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Post-Print halshs-00149145, HAL.
    2. Fabian Muniesa & Michel Callon, 2007. "Economic experiments and the construction of markets," Post-Print halshs-00177935, HAL.
    3. Cornelia Woll, 2008. "Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade," Post-Print hal-02183956, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia A. Latushko, 2021. "Cultivating Patriotism—A Pioneering Note on a Russian Dimension of Corporate Ethics Management," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Mathieu, Quentin & Pouch, Thierry, 2018. "Russie : un retour réussi sur la scène agricole mondiale. Des années 1990 à l’embargo," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 365(July-Sept).
    3. Thierry Pouch & Quentin Mathieu, 2018. "Russia: A successful comeback on the world agricultural market. From the 1990s to the embargo [Russie : un retour réussi sur la scène agricole mondiale. Des années 1990 à l'embargo]," Post-Print hal-02050661, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Sabine Carton & Carine Dominguez-Perry & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2012. "Performativity and Information Technologies: An inter-organizational perspective," Post-Print halshs-00851315, HAL.
    2. Mélodie Cartel & Franck Aggeri, 2013. "Exploring low carbon futures," Post-Print hal-01117309, HAL.
    3. Kristin Asdal & Béatrice Cointe, 2022. "Writing good economics: how texts 'on the move' perform the lab and discipline of experimental economics," Post-Print hal-03429169, HAL.
    4. Vaughan Higgins & Jacqui Dibden, 2011. "Biosecurity, Trade Liberalisation, and the (anti)Politics of Risk Analysis: The Australia-New Zealand Apples Dispute," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 393-409, February.
    5. Mélodie Cartel & Eva Boxenbaum & Franck Aggeri & Jean-Yves Caneill, 2017. "Policy making as collective bricolage: the role of the electricity sector in the making of the European carbon market," Post-Print hal-01615460, HAL.
    6. Brisset, Nicolas, 2017. "On Performativity: Option Theory And The Resistance Of Financial Phenomena," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 549-569, December.
    7. Banzhaf, H. Spencer, 2016. "Constructing markets: environmental economics and the contingent valuation controversy," MPRA Paper 78814, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Mélodie Cartel & Eva Boxenbaum & Franck Aggeri, 2014. "Policy making as bricolage: the role of platforms in institutional innovation," Post-Print hal-01089462, HAL.
    9. Callon, Michel, 2009. "Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 535-548, April.
    10. Fabian Muniesa & Michel Callon, 2008. "La performativité des sciences économiques," CSI Working Papers Series 010, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    11. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    12. Nona Schulte-Römer, 2013. "Fair framings: arts and culture festivals as sites for technical innovation," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 12(1), pages 151-165, June.
    13. Manuel Wirth, 2021. "Mobilizing affect, shaping market subjects: Tracing the connections of neuroliberalism and social finance in youth homelessness projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1356-1372, September.
    14. Tuckett, David & Holmes, Douglas & Pearson, Alice & Chaplin, Graeme, 2020. "Monetary policy and the management of uncertainty: a narrative approach," Bank of England working papers 870, Bank of England.
    15. MacKenzie, Donald, 2009. "Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 440-455, April.
    16. Michel Callon, 2006. "What does it mean to say that economics is performative?," CSI Working Papers Series 005, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    17. Millo, Yuval & MacKenzie, Donald, 2009. "The usefulness of inaccurate models: Towards an understanding of the emergence of financial risk management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 638-653, July.
    18. Jan-Peter Voß & Arno Simons, 2018. "A novel understanding of experimentation in governance: co-producing innovations between “lab” and “field”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(2), pages 213-229, June.
    19. Jeffrey M. Chwieroth & Timothy J. Sinclair, 2013. "How you stand depends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 457-485, June.
    20. Vollmer, Hendrik & Mennicken, Andrea & Preda, Alex, 2009. "Tracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 619-637, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:67:y:2015:i:1:p:84-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.