IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relative forecast accuracy of UK brokers


  • John Capstaff
  • Krishna Paudyal
  • William Rees


In this study we examine whether there are differences in the accuracy of forecasts produced by brokers for a sample of almost 300,000 forecasts of the earnings per share of UK firms, over a period which spans accounting year ends from 1987–95. We report evidence of differential forecast accuracy which is contrary to much of the existing US research, in particular O'Brien (1985 and 1990). We use a forecast error that is controlled for the size of the firm being forecast, the industry to which the firm belongs, the accounting year being forecast, and the forecast horizon. There is evidence of short term persistence in the relative performance of the brokers across the full sample, and for some brokers there is evidence of forecast superiority over an extended period. We also find evidence that the relative accuracy of brokers differs between industries, which suggests that brokers tend to develop expertise in particular sectors. There are significant differences between brokers' accuracy in seven of the 11 industries in the sample, and in some industries there is evidence of persistently superior performance. Overall, these findings have implications for the construction of the earnings expectations proxies that are used in capital market research.

Suggested Citation

  • John Capstaff & Krishna Paudyal & William Rees, 1999. "The relative forecast accuracy of UK brokers," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 3-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:30:y:1999:i:1:p:3-16
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1999.9728920

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. repec:bla:joares:v:35:y:1997:i::p:131-157 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brown, Lawrence D., 1993. "Reply to commentaries on "Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research"," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 343-344, November.
    3. Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-291, March.
    4. Brown, Lawrence D. & Hagerman, Robert L. & Griffin, Paul A. & Zmijewski, Mark E., 1987. "An evaluation of alternative proxies for the market's assessment of unexpected earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 159-193, July.
    5. repec:bla:joares:v:29:y:1991:i:1:p:170-179 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Brown, Lawrence D., 1993. "Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 295-320, November.
    7. repec:wly:coacre:v:12:y:1995:i:1:p:131-160 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:bla:joares:v:29:y:1991:i:1:p:150-156 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:bla:joares:v:35:y:1997:i::p:159-166 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:bla:joares:v:29:y:1991:i:2:p:397-417 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Brown, Philip, 1993. "Comments on 'Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research' by L. Brown," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 331-335, November.
    12. Stickel, Scott E, 1992. " Reputation and Performance among Security Analysts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(5), pages 1811-1836, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:30:y:1999:i:1:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.