IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v6y2019i4p1987-2002.html

Analysis of respondents' opinions and attitudes toward the security of payment systems

Author

Listed:
  • Antonín Korauš

    (Academy of the Police Force in Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Miroslav Gombár

    (University of Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Pavel Kelemen

    (University of Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Polák

    (University of Prešov, Slovakia)

Abstract

The number of financial and cyber-attacks is increasing. The latter trend in financial and cyber security incidents is global and, as such it is being monitored globally. Cyber and financial statistical data and the growing number of certified information management systems show the practical importance of data security at the international level. The decisions to solve the data security problems are based on the technical point of view, protection motivation theory, and security standards. By analysing the security of payment system, this article aspires to aid in the development of secure systems. Its aim is to contribute to the knowledge and comprehension of the behaviour of payment systems users with special focus on the aspect of their security. The article analyses the opinions and attitudes of respondents toward the questions dealing with the security of payment systems and their behaviour when using payment cards. The analysis is carried out from the aspect of gender, age and education of respondents by using multidimensional statistical methods, namely factor analysis and analysis of dispersion.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonín Korauš & Miroslav Gombár & Pavel Kelemen & Jozef Polák, 2019. "Analysis of respondents' opinions and attitudes toward the security of payment systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1987-2002, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2019:i:4:p:1987-2002
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(31)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/24/Koraus_Analysis_of_respondents_opinions_and_attitudes_toward_the_security_of_payment_systems.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/334
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(31)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aven, Terje, 2012. "The risk concept—historical and recent development trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 33-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ján Dobrovič & Veronika Čabinová & Peter Gallo & Petra Partlová & Jan Váchal & Beáta Balogová & Jozef Orgonáš, 2021. "Application of the DEA Model in Tourism SMEs: An Empirical Study from Slovakia in the Context of Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Blokland & Genserik Reniers, 2019. "An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Marcela Tuzová & Martina Toulová & Lea Kubíčková, 2017. "The Specifics of the Internationalization Process of Czech SMEs in the Food Industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 1055-1064.
    3. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.
    4. Lindbom, Hanna & Tehler, Henrik & Eriksson, Kerstin & Aven, Terje, 2015. "The capability concept – On how to define and describe capability in relation to risk, vulnerability and resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 45-54.
    5. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    6. Valentin Nikolaenko & Anatoly Sidorov, 2023. "Analysis of 105 IT Project Risks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Garcez, Thalles Vitelli & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2014. "A risk measurement tool for an underground electricity distribution system considering the consequences and uncertainties of manhole events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 68-80.
    8. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    9. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    10. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    11. Jacob Taarup‐Esbensen, 2019. "Making Sense of Risk—A Sociological Perspective on the Management of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 749-760, April.
    12. Yang, Zhisen & Liu, Xintong & Yang, Zaili & Yu, Qing, 2026. "A novel data-driven risk assessment framework for improved inspection efficiency of port state control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PA).
    13. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Peng Hou & Xiaojian Yi & Haiping Dong, 2020. "A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Sylwia Werbińska-Wojciechowska, 2021. "Risk Management Maturity Model for Logistic Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Rokstad, Marius Møller & Ugarelli, Rita Maria, 2015. "Minimising the total cost of renewal and risk of water infrastructure assets by grouping renewal interventions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 148-160.
    17. Aven, Terje, 2020. "Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Adebanji William Adebanji & Oluwole Iyiola & Olaleke Oluseye Ogunnaike & Stephen Ayodotun Ibidunni & Oluwaseun Akinde & Idowu Olubodun, 2017. "Empirical Assessment of Social Motivation and Performance of Informal Entrepreneurs in Computer Village, Lagos State," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 13(5), pages 26-47, OCTOBER.
    19. Liu, Quanlong & Peng, Yumeng & Li, Zhiyang & Zhao, Pan & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2021. "Hazard identification methodology for underground coal mine risk management - Root-State Hazard Identification," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Aven, Terje, 2013. "Practical implications of the new risk perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 136-145.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2019:i:4:p:1987-2002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.