IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Closed-Loop Water Conservation System at Micro Level Through Circular Economy Approach


  • Mousumi Roy

    () (National Institute of Technology)

  • Lassi Linnanen

    (Lappeenranta University of Technology)

  • Sankha Chakrabortty

    (National Institute of Technology)

  • Parimal Pal

    () (National Institute of Technology)


A closed loop system for micro-level conservation of fresh water at household user point has been developed in this work in a comprehensive circular economy (CE) framework encompassing technical, environmental and economic aspects in a concurrent manner. The system has been developed through field survey of households in an urban setting in Indian context and experimental investigation on membrane filtration and recirculation of grey water generated from domestic use like cooking, bathing, washing etc. Pollution load of the grey water utilized in the sample involved high alkalinity (pH = 9.00), total suspended solid (TSS = 536 mg/L), odour (TON 2). Membrane based filtration process has been developed to ensure that the reclaimed water is of acceptable quality as alkalinity decreases to 7.2, TSS reduces to 95 mg per litre and odour in terms of TON reduces to one. Economic feasibility of implementing such a system is assessed by cost benefit analysis. Estimated annualized total cost (capital and operating) for treating and reusing a cubic meter of waste water in this CE framework amounts to US $1.5 only. Preference score derived from utility estimates of conjoint analysis (CA) reveal that consumers have positive attitude to accept water conservation strategy in circular economy framework. The ideal composition of reclaimed grey water to be preferred is odourless (TON value near 1), low TSS (less than 102 mg/L) and neutral pH (nearly7.00) The study reveals that about half of fresh water demand per day per capita can be saved by developing a closed-loop production system at micro level, where grey water generated as waste from domestic use is not discharged as followed in traditional open-ended economic model. Instead of take-make-use-discharge, waste water is added in the production system as a resource. After applying an advanced cost-effective clean technology, grey water is kept in a material loop and usage creating further value for a longer period. Sustainable water system development by this holistic circular water conservation approach is no longer an option but a necessity to protect the life-sustaining valuable freshwater resource. Developing water conservation system in closed-loop model provides a novel solution as it will yield positive and significant utility and economic value in a very cost effective green design.

Suggested Citation

  • Mousumi Roy & Lassi Linnanen & Sankha Chakrabortty & Parimal Pal, 2019. "Developing a Closed-Loop Water Conservation System at Micro Level Through Circular Economy Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4157-4170, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:12:d:10.1007_s11269-019-02347-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02347-z

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Encarnación Gil-Meseguer & Miguel Borja Bernabé-Crespo & José María Gómez-Espín, 2019. "Recycled Sewage - A Water Resource for Dry Regions of Southeastern Spain," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 725-737, January.
    2. Barbara Baarsma, 2003. "The Valuation of the IJmeer Nature Reserve using Conjoint Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(3), pages 343-356, July.
    3. Garrod, G. D. & Willis, K. G., 1997. "The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 45-61, April.
    4. F. Thomas Juster, 1966. "Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number just66-2, Juni.
    5. Alvarez-Farizo, Begona & Hanley, Nick, 2002. "Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 107-116, January.
    6. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74, pages 132-132.
    7. Hunt Allcott & Todd Rogers, 2014. "The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3003-3037, October.
    8. Mousumi Roy, 2010. "Managing the village-level open-access water resources in a region facing rapidly declining water availability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 999-1012, December.
    9. Harry Telser & Peter Zweifel, 2002. "Measuring willingness‐to‐pay for risk reduction: an application of conjoint analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 129-139, March.
    10. Liang Lu & David Deller & Morten Hviid, 2019. "Price and Behavioural Signals to Encourage Household Water Conservation: Implications for the UK," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 475-491, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:12:d:10.1007_s11269-019-02347-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.