IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v66y2025i5d10.1007_s00362-025-01673-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum likelihood estimation under the Emax model: existence, geometry and efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Aletti

    (Università degli Studi di Milano)

  • Nancy Flournoy

    (University of Missouri)

  • Caterina May

    (Università del Piemonte Orientale
    King’s College London)

  • Chiara Tommasi

    (Università degli Studi di Milano)

Abstract

This study focuses on the estimation of the Emax dose–response model, a widely utilized framework in clinical trials, experiments in pharmacology, agriculture, environmental science, and more. Existing challenges in obtaining maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) for model parameters are often ascribed to computational issues but, in reality, stem from the absence of a MLE. Our contribution provides new understanding and control of all the experimental situations that practitioners might face, guiding them in the estimation process. We derive the exact MLE for a three-point experimental design and identify the two scenarios where the MLE fails to exist. To address these challenges, we propose utilizing Firth’s modified score, which we express analytically as a function of the experimental design. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate that the Firth modification yields a finite estimate in one of the problematic scenarios. For the remaining case, we introduce a design-augmentation strategy akin to a hypothesis test.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Aletti & Nancy Flournoy & Caterina May & Chiara Tommasi, 2025. "Maximum likelihood estimation under the Emax model: existence, geometry and efficiency," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-025-01673-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-025-01673-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-025-01673-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-025-01673-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-025-01673-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.