IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v108y2021i1p71-82..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jeffreys-prior penalty, finiteness and shrinkage in binomial-response generalized linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Kosmidis
  • David Firth

Abstract

SummaryPenalization of the likelihood by Jeffreys’ invariant prior, or a positive power thereof, is shown to produce finite-valued maximum penalized likelihood estimates in a broad class of binomial generalized linear models. The class of models includes logistic regression, where the Jeffreys-prior penalty is known additionally to reduce the asymptotic bias of the maximum likelihood estimator, and models with other commonly used link functions, such as probit and log-log. Shrinkage towards equiprobability across observations, relative to the maximum likelihood estimator, is established theoretically and studied through illustrative examples. Some implications of finiteness and shrinkage for inference are discussed, particularly when inference is based on Wald-type procedures. A widely applicable procedure is developed for computation of maximum penalized likelihood estimates, by using repeated maximum likelihood fits with iteratively adjusted binomial responses and totals. These theoretical results and methods underpin the increasingly widespread use of reduced-bias and similarly penalized binomial regression models in many applied fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Kosmidis & David Firth, 2021. "Jeffreys-prior penalty, finiteness and shrinkage in binomial-response generalized linear models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 108(1), pages 71-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:1:p:71-82.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaa052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rigon, Tommaso & Aliverti, Emanuele, 2023. "Conjugate priors and bias reduction for logistic regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Yuta Sekiguchi & Masayoshi Tanishita & Daisuke Sunaga, 2022. "Characteristics of Cyclist Crashes Using Polytomous Latent Class Analysis and Bias-Reduced Logistic Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2023. "Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:108:y:2021:i:1:p:71-82.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.