IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v66y2025i3d10.1007_s00362-025-01686-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust estimation of heteroscedastic regression models: a brief overview and new proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Conceição Amado

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Lisboa, CEMAT)

  • Ana M. Bianco

    (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET)

  • Graciela Boente

    (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires
    Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET)

  • Isabel M. Rodrigues

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Lisboa, CEMAT)

Abstract

We collect robust proposals given in the field of regression models with heteroscedastic errors. Our motivation stems from the fact that the practitioner frequently faces the confluence of two phenomena in the context of data analysis: nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity. The impact of heteroscedasticity on the precision of the estimators is well–known, however the conjunction of these two phenomena makes handling outliers more difficult. An iterative procedure to estimate the parameters of a heteroscedastic nonlinear model is considered. The studied estimators combine weighted $$MM-$$ M M - regression estimators, to control the impact of high leverage points, and a robust method to estimate the parameters of the variance function.

Suggested Citation

  • Conceição Amado & Ana M. Bianco & Graciela Boente & Isabel M. Rodrigues, 2025. "Robust estimation of heteroscedastic regression models: a brief overview and new proposals," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-025-01686-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-025-01686-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-025-01686-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-025-01686-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neykov, N.M. & Filzmoser, P. & Neytchev, P.N., 2012. "Robust joint modeling of mean and dispersion through trimming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 34-48, January.
    2. Ana M. Bianco & Paula M. Spano, 2019. "Robust inference for nonlinear regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 369-398, June.
    3. Mariana C. Araújo & Audrey H. M. A. Cysneiros & Lourdes C. Montenegro, 2020. "Improved heteroskedasticity likelihood ratio tests in symmetric nonlinear regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 167-188, February.
    4. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2011. "Robust diagnostics for the heteroscedastic regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1845-1866, April.
    5. Y. Fong & J. Wakefield & S. De Rosa & N. Frahm, 2012. "A Robust Bayesian Random Effects Model for Nonlinear Calibration Problems," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1103-1112, December.
    6. A. Philip Dawid & Monica Musio & Laura Ventura, 2016. "Minimum Scoring Rule Inference," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 123-138, March.
    7. Atkinson, Anthony C. & Riani, Marco & Torti, Francesca, 2016. "Robust methods for heteroskedastic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 209-222.
    8. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2005. "Robust regression diagnostics with data transformations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 875-891, June.
    9. Yoonsuh Jung, 2019. "Nonlinear regression models for heterogeneous data with massive outliers," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 1456-1477, June.
    10. Hawkins, Douglas M. & Khan, Dost Muhammad, 2009. "A procedure for robust fitting in nonlinear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4500-4507, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atkinson, Anthony C. & Riani, Marco & Torti, Francesca, 2016. "Robust methods for heteroskedastic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 209-222.
    2. Neykov, N.M. & Filzmoser, P. & Neytchev, P.N., 2012. "Robust joint modeling of mean and dispersion through trimming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 34-48, January.
    3. R de Fondeville & A C Davison, 2018. "High-dimensional peaks-over-threshold inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 575-592.
    4. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2012. "On simultaneously identifying outliers and heteroscedasticity without specific form," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2258-2272.
    5. Mariela Sued & Marina Valdora & Víctor Yohai, 2020. "Robust doubly protected estimators for quantiles with missing data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(3), pages 819-843, September.
    6. Neykov, N.M. & Čížek, P. & Filzmoser, P. & Neytchev, P.N., 2012. "The least trimmed quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1757-1770.
    7. Barranco-Chamorro, I. & Jiménez-Gamero, M.D. & Moreno-Rebollo, J.L. & Muñoz-Pichardo, J.M., 2012. "Case-deletion type diagnostics for calibration estimators in survey sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2219-2236.
    8. Raphaël de Fondeville & Anthony C. Davison, 2022. "Functional peaks‐over‐threshold analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1392-1422, September.
    9. F. Giummolè & V. Mameli & E. Ruli & L. Ventura, 2019. "Objective Bayesian inference with proper scoring rules," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 728-755, September.
    10. Jack Jewson & David Rossell, 2022. "General Bayesian loss function selection and the use of improper models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1640-1665, November.
    11. Francesco Bravo, 2020. "Robust estimation and inference for general varying coefficient models with missing observations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 966-988, December.
    12. Catania, Leopoldo & Luati, Alessandra, 2020. "Robust estimation of a location parameter with the integrated Hogg function," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Pitselis, Georgios, 2017. "Risk measures in a quantile regression credibility framework with Fama/French data applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 122-134.
    14. Andrés Muñoz & Daniela Rodriguez, 2023. "Robust estimation in partially nonlinear models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(5), pages 1407-1437, December.
    15. Paolo Vidoni, 2021. "Boosting multiplicative model combination," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 761-789, September.
    16. Li-Chu Chien & Tsung-Shan Tsou, 2014. "Robust influence diagnostics for generalized linear models with continuous responses," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(4), pages 324-343, November.
    17. Tiago M. Magalhães & Gustavo H. A. Pereira & Denise A. Botter & Mônica C. Sandoval, 2024. "Bartlett corrections for zero-adjusted generalized linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2191-2209, June.
    18. Grossi, Luigi & Nan, Fany, 2019. "Robust forecasting of electricity prices: Simulations, models and the impact of renewable sources," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 305-318.
    19. Tao Wang, 2024. "Nonlinear kernel mode‐based regression for dependent data," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 189-213, March.
    20. Claudio Heinrich‐Mertsching & Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir & Peter Guttorp & Max Schneider, 2024. "Validation of point process predictions with proper scoring rules," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 51(4), pages 1533-1566, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-025-01686-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.