IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v65y2024i1d10.1007_s00362-023-01398-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalised score distribution: underdispersed continuation of the beta-binomial distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan Ćmiel

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

  • Jakub Nawała

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

  • Lucjan Janowski

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

  • Krzysztof Rusek

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Consider a class of discrete probability distributions with a limited support. A typical example of such support is some variant of a Likert scale, with a response mapped to either the $$\{1, 2, \ldots , 5\}$$ { 1 , 2 , … , 5 } or $$\{-3, -2, \ldots , 2, 3\}$$ { - 3 , - 2 , … , 2 , 3 } set. Such type of data is common for Multimedia Quality Assessment but can also be found in many other research fields. For modelling such data a latent variable approach is usually used (e.g., Ordered Probit). In many cases it is convenient or even necessary to avoid latent variable approach (e.g., when dealing with too small sample size). To avoid it the proper class of discrete distributions is needed. The main idea of this paper is to propose a family of discrete probability distributions with only two parameters that play the same role as the parameters of the normal distribution. We call the new class the Generalised Score Distribution (GSD). The proposed GSD class covers the entire set of possible means and variances, for any fixed and finite support. Furthermore, the GSD class can be treated as an underdispersed continuation of a reparametrized beta-binomial distribution. The GSD class parameters are intuitive and can be easily estimated by the method of moments. We also offer a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) algorithm for the GSD class and evidence that the class properly describes response distributions coming from 24 Multimedia Quality Assessment experiments. At last, we show that the GSD class can be represented as a sum of dichotomous zero–one random variables, which points to an interesting interpretation of the class.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan Ćmiel & Jakub Nawała & Lucjan Janowski & Krzysztof Rusek, 2024. "Generalised score distribution: underdispersed continuation of the beta-binomial distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-413, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-023-01398-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-023-01398-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-023-01398-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-023-01398-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, William E. & Kennedy, Peter E., 1992. "A Graphical Exposition of the Ordered Probit," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 127-131, March.
    2. Stephen J. Gange & Alvaro Muñoz & Marc Sáez & Jordi Alonso, 1996. "Use of the Beta‐Binomial Distribution to Model the Effect of Policy Changes on Appropriateness of Hospital Stays," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 45(3), pages 371-382, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frisch, L.C. & Mathis, J.T. & Kettle, N.P. & Trainor, S.F., 2015. "Gauging perceptions of ocean acidification in Alaska," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 101-110.
    2. Julia Moser, 2020. "Teilzeit - ein Karrierekiller?: Eine empirische Analyse," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1090, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Romina Gambacorta & Maria Iannario, 2012. "Statistical models for measuring job satisfaction," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 852, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Marc J. Leclere, 1999. "The Interpretation of Coefficients in N†Chotomous Qualitative Response Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 711-747, December.
    5. Ahlstrom, Laura J. & Harter, Cynthia & Asarta, Carlos J., 2023. "Teaching methods and materials in undergraduate economics courses: School, instructor, and department effects," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Manfred Gärtner & Björn Griesbach & Florian Jung, 2011. "PIGS or Lambs? The European Sovereign Debt Crisis and the Role of Rating Agencies," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(3), pages 288-299, August.
    7. Qinglong Shao, 2022. "Does less working time improve life satisfaction? Evidence from European Social Survey," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Kaiser, Ulrich, 1997. "The determinants of BUND-future price changes: An ordered probit analysis using DTB and LIFFE data," ZEW Discussion Papers 97-09, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    10. repec:kap:iaecre:v:17:y:2011:i:3:p:288-299 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shivani Gupta & Sangeeta Bansal, "undated". "Overnutrition and Risk of Diabetes: A Micro Data Analysis for India," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-04, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    12. Joanne Loundes, 2000. "Management and Industrial Relations Practices and Outcomes in Australian Workplaces," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2000n12, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    13. Shao, Qinglong & Kostka, Genia, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and deepening digital inequalities in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    14. Anantharaman, Divya, 2012. "Comparing self-regulation and statutory regulation: Evidence from the accounting profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 55-77.
    15. Cordell, Victor V. & Wongtada, Nittaya & Kieschnick, Robert Jr., 1996. "Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-53, January.
    16. Kuenga Choden, 2019. "An ordered probit model on quitting decision of secondary public school teachers in Bhutan," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(2), pages 65-78.
    17. Cynthia Harter & Georg Schaur & Michael Watts, 2015. "School, department, and instructor determinants of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(4), pages 1169-1188, April.
    18. Romina Gambacorta & Maria Iannario, 2013. "Measuring Job Satisfaction with CUB Models," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 27(2), pages 198-224, June.
    19. Pédussel Wu, Jennifer, 2004. "Measuring and explaining levels of regional economic integration," ZEI Working Papers B 12-2004, University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies.
    20. Danko Tarabar & Joshua C. Hall, 2016. "Explaining the worldwide decline in the length of mandatory military service, 1970–2010," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 55-74, July.
    21. Ozcam, Ahmet & Karadeniz, Esra, 2012. "The Determinants of the Growth Expectations of Turkish Entrepreneurs in the Way up the Entrepreneural Ladder Using Ordinal Logistic Model (OLM)," MPRA Paper 49908, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-023-01398-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.