IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v30y2019i6d10.1134_s1075700719060030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Russia into the Global Project of Digital Transformation: Opportunities, Problems and Risks

Author

Listed:
  • N. A. Ganichev

    (Institute of Economic Forecasting, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • O. B. Koshovets

    (Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Can the worldwide development of the digital economy relaunch global economic growth? What is really ensured the projected high growth rates of digital economy made by international institutions? Will the program for the development of the digital economy in the Russian Federation be able to stimulate the competitiveness of Russia’s economy? Firstly, this article seeks to answer if high expectations placed on digital economy are equal to its real impact on the global economic growth in the long-term. It appears that despite widespread declarations the development of the digital economy is not a sustainable path for engendering rapid growth of the world economy rather an attempt to consolidate asserts globally for building a fundamentally new digital infrastructure based on microelectronic and software products on a worldwide scale and create numerous new mass markets for ICT and microelectronics TNC. Given that the authors show that at the global level, in fact two different models of the digital economy development are implemented: one for developed countries and the other for developing ones. The digital transformation model offered by international institutions to developing countries might lead to the loss of technological sovereignty and consolidation of the long-term status of “technological periphery.” Based on this analysis the authors consider Russian digital economy development program, which ignores several extremely important aspects of the implementation of international projects of digital transformation. The measures outlined in the program may not fully meet the stated goals, at least in terms of maintaining technological independence.

Suggested Citation

  • N. A. Ganichev & O. B. Koshovets, 2019. "Integrating Russia into the Global Project of Digital Transformation: Opportunities, Problems and Risks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 627-636, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:30:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1134_s1075700719060030
    DOI: 10.1134/S1075700719060030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1075700719060030
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S1075700719060030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga B. Koshovets & Nikolay A. Ganichev, 2016. "Nanotechnology Contribution To Innovation-Driven Growth: Hype Or Hope?," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 10(1), pages 546-561.
    2. O. B. Koshovets & N. A. Ganichev, 2017. "Nanotechnology and the new technological revolution: Expectations and reality," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 391-397, July.
    3. Carlota Perez, 2009. "The double bubble at the turn of the century: technological roots and structural implications," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 779-805, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. N. A. Ganichev & O. B. Koshovets, 2021. "Forcing the Digital Economy: How will the Structure of Digital Markets Change as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 11-22, January.
    2. A. A. Akaev & V. A. Sadovnichii, 2021. "The Human Component as a Determining Factor of Labor Productivity in the Digital Economy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 29-36, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. A. Ganichev & O. B. Koshovets, 2018. "Russian Nanotechnology Market: High-Technology Industry or Statistical Phenomenon," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 12-20, January.
    2. Roger Hayter & Klaus Edenhoffer, 2016. "Evolutionary Geography of a Mature Resource Sector: Shakeouts and Shakeins in British Columbia's Forest Industries 1980 to 2008," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 497-519, December.
    3. Di Liberto, Yuri, 2022. "Hype: The Capitalist Degree of Induced Participation," Review of Capital as Power, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16.
    4. Archibugi, Daniele & Filippetti, Andrea & Frenz, Marion, 2013. "Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 303-314.
    5. William Kingston, 2014. "Schumpeter and the end of Western Capitalism," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 449-477, July.
    6. Sindhuja Ranganathan & Mikko Kivelä & Juho Kanniainen, 2018. "Dynamics of investor spanning trees around dot-com bubble," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Filippetti, Andrea & Archibugi, Daniele, 2010. "Innovation in Times of Crisis: The Uneven Effects of the Economic Downturn across Europe," MPRA Paper 22084, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Roger Fouquet & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "Twin Transitions of Decarbonisation and Digitalisation: A Historical Perspective on Energy and Information in European Economies," Working Papers 08-22, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    9. Dirk-Hinnerk Fischer & Hovhannes Yeritsyan, 2018. "A Common Misunderstanding about Capitalism and Communism Through the Eyes of Innovation," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria & Galanis, Giorgos, 2018. "Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 219-234.
    11. Grant-Muller, Susan & Usher, Mark, 2014. "Intelligent Transport Systems: The propensity for environmental and economic benefits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 149-166.
    12. Otavio Ribeiro de Medeiros and Vitor Leone, 2012. "Multiple Changes in Persistence vs. Explosive Behaviour: The Dotcom Bubble," NBS Discussion Papers in Economics 2012/02, Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.
    13. Quinn, William, 2016. "Technological revolutions and speculative finance: Evidence from the British Bicycle Mania," QUCEH Working Paper Series 2016-06, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History.
    14. Alessandro Arrighetti & Fabio Landini & Andrea Lasagni, 2021. "Swimming upstream throughout the turmoil: Evidence on firm growth during the great recession," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 68(3), pages 322-344, July.
    15. Francisco Louçã, 2021. "As time went by - why is the long wave so long?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 749-771, July.
    16. Alessandro Vercelli, 2014. "Financialisation and Sustainability:a Long-run Perspective," Working papers wpaper48, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    17. Mark Knell, 2015. "Schumpeter, Minsky and the financial instability hypothesis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 293-310, January.
    18. Johan Schot & Laur Kanger, 2016. "Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality," SPRU Working Paper Series 2016-15, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    19. Parrilli, Mario Davide & Alcalde Heras, Henar, 2016. "STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 747-756.
    20. Thomas Goda, 2013. "The role of income inequality in crisis theories and in the subprime crisis," Working Papers PKWP1305, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:30:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1134_s1075700719060030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.