IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i8d10.1007_s11192-025-05396-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years

Author

Listed:
  • Anna-Lena Rüland

    (University College London)

  • Lise H. Andersen

    (Leiden University)

  • Alan Kai Hassen

    (Leiden University)

  • Carringtone Kinyanjui

    (University of Manchester)

  • Annika Ralfs

    (Lund University)

  • Bruno Iochins Grisci

    (Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul)

Abstract

Science diplomacy is a unique research field that is driven and shaped by scholars and practitioners alike. This study examines whether and how recent trends in the broader science diplomacy discourse have impacted scholarship on the topic. First, it examines whether the pertinent scholarship is as international in outlook as practitioners have made science diplomacy out to be. Second, the study investigates whether recent calls to diversify the science diplomacy scholarship have gained traction. It does so by examining how diverse the science diplomacy scholarship is in terms of: (i) The geographical distribution of authors, (ii) the geographical distribution of funding sources as well as (iii) the geographical area that is being studied in science diplomacy publications. Using a network analysis and a large language model-enhanced bibliometric analysis, the study shows that the internationalization of the field—both in terms of author affiliations and geographical area being studied in publications—is only slowly advancing and is currently restricted to a few regions, with the United States and Europe clearly dominating the production of knowledge on science diplomacy. Overall, the study’s findings thus corroborate past claims that the science diplomacy scholarship exhibits North–South dynamics similar to those in other research fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna-Lena Rüland & Lise H. Andersen & Alan Kai Hassen & Carringtone Kinyanjui & Annika Ralfs & Bruno Iochins Grisci, 2025. "Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4697-4722, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05396-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toluwase Asubiaro & Sodiq Onaolapo & David Mills, 2024. "Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1469-1491, March.
    2. Tim Flink & Ulrich Schreiterer, 2010. "Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 665-677, November.
    3. Francis Bloch & Matthew O. Jackson & Pietro Tebaldi, 2023. "Centrality measures in networks," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 413-453, August.
    4. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    5. Elisabeth Epping, 2020. "Lifting the smokescreen of science diplomacy: comparing the political instrumentation of science and innovation centres," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Caroline S Wagner, 2002. "The elusive partnership: Science and foreign policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 409-417, December.
    7. Yang Bai, 2018. "Has the Global South become a playground for Western scholars in information and communication technologies for development? Evidence from a three-journal analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2139-2153, September.
    8. Sam Robinson & Matthew Adamson & Gordon Barrett & Lif Lund & Simone Turchetti & Aya Homei & Péter Marton & Leah Aronowsky & Iqra Choudry & Johan Gärdebo & Jaehwan Hyun & Gerardo Ienna & Carringtone Ki, 2023. "The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 749-758.
    9. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Vincent Larivière & Yves Gingras & Éric Archambault, 2006. "Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(3), pages 519-533, September.
    11. Torben Schubert & Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 181-203, April.
    12. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Correction: Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-2, December.
    13. Zhiya Zuo & Kang Zhao & David Eichmann, 2017. "The state and evolution of U.S. iSchools: From talent acquisitions to research outcome," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(5), pages 1266-1277, May.
    14. Sooho Lee & Carolyn Fonseca & Cameron Bess, 2023. "How Scientists from Developing and Developed Countries View International Research Collaboration: A Case Study of the USAID PEER Program," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 39(3), pages 373-396, September.
    15. Alea López de San Román & Simon Schunz, 2018. "Understanding European Union Science Diplomacy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 247-266, March.
    16. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Carolin Kaltofen & Michele Acuto, 2018. "Rebalancing the Encounter between Science Diplomacy and International Relations Theory," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 15-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Abrantes & Raquel Vaz-Pinto, 2024. "Science diplomacy in the European Union: mapping the Portuguese case (1986–2021)," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Tim Flink, 2022. "Taking the pulse of science diplomacy and developing practices of valuation [The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 191-200.
    3. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Luís Miguel Lacerda & Manuel Heitor & Jean‐Christophe Mauduit, 2023. "New architectures for bottom‐up science diplomacy: Learning from the evolving Portuguese diaspora in the UK," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 847-857, November.
    5. Yves Gingras & Mahdi Khelfaoui, 2018. "Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 517-532, February.
    6. Falko T. Buschke & Christine Estreguil & Lucia Mancini & Fabrice Mathieux & Hugh Eva & Luca Battistella & Stephen Peedell, 2023. "Digital Storytelling Through the European Commission’s Africa Knowledge Platform to Bridge the Science-Policy Interface for Raw Materials," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1141-1154, June.
    7. Jingxian Wang & Hui Tang & Wei Guo & Wendong Yu & Yunjian Luo, 2025. "Global Hotspots and Trends of Ecological Network Research (1991–2024): Insights from Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Eric Paglia, 2021. "The Swedish initiative and the 1972 Stockholm Conference: the decisive role of science diplomacy in the emergence of global environmental governance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Julián D. Cortés & Daniel A. Andrade, 2022. "Winners and runners-up alike?—a comparison between awardees and special mention recipients of the most reputable science award in Colombia via a composite citation indicator," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Rüffin, Nicolas & Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2022. "Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58((Art. No.), pages 1-12.
    11. Hanna-Mari Puuska & Reetta Muhonen & Yrjö Leino, 2014. "International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 823-839, February.
    12. Grażyna Bukowska & Jan Fałkowski & Beata Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2014. "Teaming up or writing alone - authorship strategies in leading Polish economic journals," Working Papers 2014-29, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. Ali Gazni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Fereshteh Didegah, 2012. "Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 323-335, February.
    14. Derya Buyuktanir Karacan, 2021. "Science diplomacy as a foreign policy tool for Turkey and the ramifications of collaboration with the EU," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Sam Robinson & Matthew Adamson & Gordon Barrett & Lif Lund & Simone Turchetti & Aya Homei & Péter Marton & Leah Aronowsky & Iqra Choudry & Johan Gärdebo & Jaehwan Hyun & Gerardo Ienna & Carringtone Ki, 2023. "The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 749-758.
    16. Chin-Chang Tsai & Elizabeth A. Corley & Barry Bozeman, 2016. "Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 505-529, August.
    17. Mahdi Khelfaoui & Julien Larrègue & Vincent Larivière & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Measuring national self-referencing patterns of major science producers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 979-996, May.
    18. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    19. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05396-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.