IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v50y2023i4p749-758..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Robinson
  • Matthew Adamson
  • Gordon Barrett
  • Lif Lund
  • Simone Turchetti
  • Aya Homei
  • Péter Marton
  • Leah Aronowsky
  • Iqra Choudry
  • Johan Gärdebo
  • Jaehwan Hyun
  • Gerardo Ienna
  • Carringtone Kinyanjui
  • Beatriz Martínez-Rius
  • Júlia Mascarello
  • Doubravka Olsakova
  • Giulia Rispoli
  • Waqar Zaidi

Abstract

The early 1970s brought fundamental transitions in international scientific collaboration that significantly affected the international relations in global patterns that are still relevant today. This article uses a multi-perspective approach to argue that the underlying condition for the globalization of science diplomacy was the increasing participation of recently independent countries in international technoscientific affairs, examining critical research areas, including space exploration, oceanography, nuclear technoscience, the environmental sciences, and health and population studies. Themes emerged at that time that continue to characterize what we term ‘Global Science Diplomacy’: multipolarity, resistance and agency, lack of global consensus, regional alliances and interests, and the centrality of the United Nations system to the conduct of transnational science. This survey is a first step in historical reflection on this phenomenon and shows that it was the emergence of the Global South in Science Diplomacy affairs that made Science Diplomacy global at the beginning of the 1970s.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Robinson & Matthew Adamson & Gordon Barrett & Lif Lund & Simone Turchetti & Aya Homei & Péter Marton & Leah Aronowsky & Iqra Choudry & Johan Gärdebo & Jaehwan Hyun & Gerardo Ienna & Carringtone Ki, 2023. "The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 749-758.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:749-758.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:749-758.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.