IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i7d10.1007_s11192-025-05340-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The structure and evolution of scholarly interests from antiquity to the eighteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Dampierre

    (PSL University)

  • Hugo Mercier

    (PSL University)

Abstract

Human societies reap tremendous benefits from acquiring scientific knowledge, which provides an unparalleled understanding of our universe, along with economic growth and increased life expectancy. Science is fueled by scientists’ curiosity. To better understand this curiosity and its structure, we rely on a database, Cultura 1.0, which lists all scholars found in online catalogs, in order to look for patterns in their interests. To limit the effects of Western influence, we circumscribe our study to scholars born before 1700. Since many scholars have more than one interest (e.g. mathematician and astronomer), we can construct a network of co-occurrences of interests with the 2317 ‘polymaths,’ defined here as scholars who have at least two interests (out of the 13,556 scholars of the database). While attempting to account for the overrepresentation of European scholars, our results suggest some above chance commonalities in the co-occurrences of interests, suggesting an underlying structure in scholars’ interests and curiosity. For instance, in Europe and in the rest of the world, philosophy and mathematics co-occur relatively frequently. Clustering the network of interests, three broad domains emerge: Human (e.g. history), Natural (e.g. zoology), and Abstract (e.g. mathematics). We find that every world region in the database (e.g. ancient Mediterranean) contains a similar portion of scholars devoted to each of these domains, and that the Human and Natural domains appear substitutable for each other at the margin. We believe that our findings shed light on long term historical trends in scholarly interests, and also help us better understand the structure of human curiosity.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Dampierre & Hugo Mercier, 2025. "The structure and evolution of scholarly interests from antiquity to the eighteenth century," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3383-3403, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05340-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05340-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05340-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05340-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles I. Jones, 2002. "Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 220-239, March.
    2. Fabio Blasutto & David de la Croix, 2023. "Catholic Censorship and the Demise of Knowledge Production in Early Modern Italy," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(656), pages 2899-2924.
    3. David Cutler & Angus Deaton & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2006. "The Determinants of Mortality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(3), pages 97-120, Summer.
    4. Ching Jin & Yifang Ma & Brian Uzzi, 2021. "Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Lili Miao & Dakota Murray & Woo-Sung Jung & Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Yong-Yeol Ahn, 2022. "The latent structure of global scientific development," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1206-1217, September.
    6. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    7. Scott Stern, 2004. "Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 835-853, June.
    8. Kyle Myers, 2020. "The Elasticity of Science," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 103-134, October.
    9. Haiyan Hou & Hildrun Kretschmer & Zeyuan Liu, 2008. "The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 189-202, May.
    10. Miguel R. Guevara & Dominik Hartmann & Manuel Aristarán & Marcelo Mendoza & César A. Hidalgo, 2016. "The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1695-1709, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank R. LICHTENBERG, 2018. "The Impact of New Drug Launch on Life-Years Lost in 2015 from 19 Types of Cancer in 36 Countries," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 309-354, September.
    2. Chandler, Dana & Kapelner, Adam, 2013. "Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 123-133.
    3. Christoph Carnehl & Marco Ottaviani & Justus Preusser, 2024. "Designing Scientific Grants," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 4, pages 139-178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2025. "The Long-Run Impact of Changes in Prescription Drug Sales on Mortality and Hospital Utilization in Belgium, 1998–2019," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Makridis, Christos A. & McGuire, Erin, 2023. "The quality of innovation “Booms” during “Busts”," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    6. Kyle Myers & Wei Yang Tham, 2023. "Money, Time, and Grant Design," Papers 2312.06479, arXiv.org.
    7. Fry, Caroline V. & Lynham, John & Tran, Shannon, 2023. "Ranking researchers: Evidence from Indonesia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    8. Taylan Yenilmez, 2025. "Understanding complexity in the author-journal space," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3405-3432, July.
    9. Lanza Queiroz, Bernardo & Lobo Alves Ferreira, Matheus, 2021. "The evolution of labor force participation and the expected length of retirement in Brazil," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    10. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:fqmdu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Hind Dib‐slamani & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2021. "Is theft considered less severe when the victim is a foreign company?," Post-Print hal-03340844, HAL.
    13. Jonathan Temple, 2002. "The Assessment: The New Economy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 241-264.
    14. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    15. Pauly, Stefan & Stipanicic, Fernando, 2021. "The creation and diffusion of knowledge: Evidence from the Jet Age," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2112, CEPREMAP.
    16. Christos A Makridis & Andrew A Borkowski & Gil Alterovitz, 2024. "Perspectives on advancing innovation and human flourishing through a network of AI institutes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 557-562.
    17. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    18. Hans K. Hvide & Benjamin F. Jones, 2018. "University Innovation and the Professor's Privilege," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1860-1898, July.
    19. Hussinger, Katrin & Pellens, Maikel, 2019. "Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 516-530.
    20. Parent, Olivier & LeSage, James P., 2011. "A space-time filter for panel data models containing random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 475-490, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05340-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.