IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i12d10.1007_s11192-024-05190-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The distribution of scientific project funds model based on adaptive similarity fitting and NSGA-II

Author

Listed:
  • Boze Li

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Yandong He

    (Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data)

  • Yuxuan Xiu

    (China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd.)

  • Bokui Chen

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Wai Kin Victor Chan

    (Tsinghua University)

Abstract

The distribution of scientific project funds is usually based on manual allocation, which is inefficient. Other automatic allocation methods are difficult to balance projects in different fields. In this study, we first utilize the adaptive similarity fitting method, leveraging historical project data to construct an input–output fitting model. Subsequently, we align the input–output model with data from projects awaiting funding through the application of scaling factors. Viewing project funds distribution as a multi-objective optimization problem, we employ the NSGA-II algorithm for optimization. Cases in a certain region illustrate the efficacy of our approach in the efficient distribution of research project funds, addressing the diverse preferences of decision-makers. After applying our method to reassign funds for a research grant project in a certain region, while keeping the total funding amount unchanged, the research and talent output in the region for the year 2020 are expected to increase by 10.63% and 6%, respectively. Similarly, for the year 2021, the increases in research and talent output are 6.09% and 6.64%. The total funding amount for the year 2020 can be reduced by 11.67% with the output stays the same, and for 2021, the funding amount can be reduced by 7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Boze Li & Yandong He & Yuxuan Xiu & Bokui Chen & Wai Kin Victor Chan, 2024. "The distribution of scientific project funds model based on adaptive similarity fitting and NSGA-II," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7585-7622, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05190-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05190-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05190-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-05190-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waitzberg, Ruth & Schmidt, Andrea E. & Blümel, Miriam & Penneau, Anne & Farmakas, Antonis & Ljungvall, Åsa & Barbabella, Francesco & Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo & Marchildon, Gregory P. & Saunes, Ingr, 2020. "Mapping variability in allocation of Long-Term Care funds across payer agencies in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 491-500.
    2. Jue Wang & Philip Shapira, 2011. "Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 563-586, June.
    3. Qiang Zhi & Tianguang Meng, 2016. "Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 603-628, February.
    4. Emanuela Reale & Antonio Zinilli, 2017. "Evaluation for the allocation of university research project funding: Can rules improve the peer review?," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 190-198.
    5. Yin, Zhifeng & Liang, Zheng & Zhi, Qiang, 2018. "Does the concentration of scientific research funding in institutions promote knowledge output?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1146-1159.
    6. Yu, Shiwei & Zheng, Shuhong & Gao, Shiwei & Yang, Juan, 2017. "A multi-objective decision model for investment in energy savings and emission reductions in coal mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 335-347.
    7. Liao, Chien Hsiang, 2021. "The Matthew effect and the halo effect in research funding," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    8. Saeed Roshani & Mohammad-Reza Bagherylooieh & Melika Mosleh & Mario Coccia, 2021. "What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7859-7874, September.
    9. Erjia Yan & Chaojiang Wu & Min Song, 2018. "The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 369-384, April.
    10. Melika Mosleh & Saeed Roshani & Mario Coccia, 2022. "Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1931-1951, April.
    11. Sandström, Ulf & Van den Besselaar, Peter, 2018. "Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 365-384.
    12. Kulczycki, Emanuel & Korzeń, Marcin & Korytkowski, Przemysław, 2017. "Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 282-298.
    13. Zio, E. & Bazzo, R., 2011. "A clustering procedure for reducing the number of representative solutions in the Pareto Front of multiobjective optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 624-634, May.
    14. Simianer, H. & Marti, S. B. & Gibson, J. & Hanotte, O. & Rege, J. E. O., 2003. "An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 377-392, July.
    15. Gholamreza Shojatalab & Seyed Hadi Nasseri & Iraj Mahdavi, 2023. "New multi-objective optimization model for tourism systems with fuzzy data and new approach developed epsilon constraint method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1360-1385, September.
    16. Axel Philipps, 2022. "Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists’ views on peer review and lottery," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 365-377.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou Mo & Zhang Yujie & Lei Jiasu & Tan Xiaowen, 2022. "Early firm engagement, government research funding, and the privatization of public knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4797-4826, August.
    2. Melika Mosleh & Saeed Roshani & Mario Coccia, 2022. "Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1931-1951, April.
    3. Mike Thelwall & Subreena Simrick & Ian Viney & Peter Van den Besselaar, 2023. "What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 6085-6106, November.
    4. Weishu Liu & Li Tang & Guangyuan Hu, 2020. "Funding information in Web of Science: an updated overview," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1509-1524, March.
    5. Higashide, Noriyuki & Zhang, Yi & Asatani, Kimitaka & Miura, Takahiro & Sakata, Ichiro, 2024. "Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Qing Xie & Xinyuan Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the correlation between acknowledgees’ contributions and their academic performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 6003-6027, November.
    7. Belén Álvarez-Bornstein & Adrián A. Díaz-Faes & María Bordons, 2019. "What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 805-825, May.
    8. Fernandez Martinez, Roberto & Lostado Lorza, Ruben & Santos Delgado, Ana Alexandra & Piedra, Nelson, 2021. "Use of classification trees and rule-based models to optimize the funding assignment to research projects: A case study of UTPL," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    9. Li, Heyang & Wu, Meijun & Wang, Yougui & Zeng, An, 2022. "Bibliographic coupling networks reveal the advantage of diversification in scientific projects," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    10. Ou, Guiyan & Zhao, Kang & Zuo, Renxian & Wu, Jiang, 2024. "Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    11. Dengsheng Wu & Huidong Wu & Jianping Li, 2024. "Citation advantage of positive words: predictability, temporal evolution, and universality in varied quality journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4275-4293, July.
    12. Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Andrea Petróczi, 2024. "Impact as equalizer: the demise of gender-related differences in anti-doping research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4071-4108, July.
    13. Yang Ding & Fernando Moreira, 2025. "Funding and productivity: Does winning grants affect the scientific productivity of recipients? Evidence from the social sciences and economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1831-1870, March.
    14. Dzieżyc, Maciej & Kazienko, Przemysław, 2022. "Effectiveness of research grants funded by European Research Council and Polish National Science Centre," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    15. Neuvonen, Lauri & Wildemeersch, Matthias & Vilkkumaa, Eeva, 2023. "Supporting strategy selection in multiobjective decision problems under uncertainty and hidden requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 279-293.
    16. Tang, Li & Yang, Defang & Wang, Mingxing & Guo, Ying, 2024. "The mediating impact of citation scope: Evidence from China's ESI publications," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    17. Kazuki Nakajima & Kazuyuki Shudo & Naoki Masuda, 2023. "Higher-order rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grant networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2429-2446, April.
    18. Esma J. Doğramacı & Giampiero Rossi-Fedele, 2021. "Predictors of societal and professional impact of orthodontic research. A multivariate, scientometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 9223-9248, November.
    19. Pan, Wenhui & Zhao, Pengwei & Qin, Chunxiu & Ding, Xianfeng, 2020. "How do new members affect the relationship between principal investigator’s network position and academic output of granted funds?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Saarela, Mirka & Kärkkäinen, Tommi, 2020. "Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05190-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.