IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v14y2024i1d10.1134_s2079970523600300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Russian–Belarusian Borderland: Contradictions of Integration and Cross-Border Regionalization. From Friendship to Cooperation?

Author

Listed:
  • A. B. Sebentsov

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • K. A. Morachevskaya

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
    St. Petersburg State University)

  • M. S. Karpenko

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Cross-border regionalization is a process and at the same time a result of development of cross-border interactions leading to the emergence of cross-border regions. Rethinking the European experience and the postulates of the Soviet regional school, cross-border regionalization researchers are trying to understand the principles of building cross-border regions on Russia’s new and old borders. However, many fundamental questions remain open. What impact do interstate integration initiatives have on cross-border regionalization? What makes a more significant contribution to regionalization: the institutionalization of cross-border interactions, good neighborly relations, or the presence of functional ties between neighbors? The aim of the study is to contribute to this debate with a case study of the Russian–Belarusian borderland, characterized by a low barrier function of the border and cultural and historical proximity. The conceptual basis is the understanding of cross-border regionalization as a process defined as internal (often “objective”), and external (“subjective”) factors, which makes it possible to reconcile “objectivist” and “constructivist” research approaches. The work is based on an analysis of official statistical information, the results of many years of field research, including expert interviews, and expert questionnaires. The study showed that integration processes slow the divergence of the Russian–Belarusian borderland in socioeconomic terms, but do not lead to significant convergence. The combination of these processes, on the one hand, undermines the potential of cross-border regionalization, and on the other, creates preconditions for the formation of “border rent,” complementarity of labor markets, and Russian–Belarusian borderland acting as a “buffer zone.” Along with the intermetropolitan and transit character, cross-border regionalization is influenced by periphery, which goes hand-in-hand with destruction of the territory’s cross-border transport connectivity. The daily practices of borderland residents still create a relatively strong fabric of cooperation, but the passing of Soviet generations and ongoing depopulation of the borderland may eventually lead to degradation in cross-border interactions. It was revealed that a weak institutional framework and lack of financial support for cooperation are perceived by experts as a serious limiting factor, especially by experts who have experience in implementing neighborhood programs on borders with the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • A. B. Sebentsov & K. A. Morachevskaya & M. S. Karpenko, 2024. "The Russian–Belarusian Borderland: Contradictions of Integration and Cross-Border Regionalization. From Friendship to Cooperation?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 61-76, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970523600300
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970523600300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970523600300
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970523600300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. A. Kolosov & M. V. Zotova & A. B. Sebentsov, 2016. "The barrier function of Russia’s borders," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 387-397, October.
    2. Cartone, Alfredo & Postiglione, Paolo & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 2021. "Does economic convergence hold? A spatial quantile analysis on European regions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 408-417.
    3. Anssi Paasi, 1999. "Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 669-680.
    4. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 861-879, December.
    5. K. A. Morachevskaya & A. N. Shavel’ & A. S. Zinovyev, 2018. "Structural Shifts in the Foreign Trade of Border Regions of Russia and Belarus in the Context of Political and Economic Challenges of the 2010s," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 269-280, July.
    6. Vladimir Kolosov & Kira Morachevskaya, 2022. "The Role of an Open Border in the Development of Peripheral Border Regions: The Case of Russian-Belarusian Borderland," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 533-550, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. A. Kolosov, 2023. "Border Studies: Development of the Theory and Major Trends in a Changing Geopolitical Environment," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 652-662, December.
    2. A. B. Sebentsov & M. S. Karpenko & K. A. Morachevskaya & A. V. Sheludkov, 2024. "Barrier Function and Transport Accessibility of State Border as Factors of Cross-Border Interactions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 209-221, December.
    3. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    4. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & James R Wilson & Markku Sotarauta, 2017. "Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 559-568, June.
    5. NELLES Jennifer, 2010. "All for One? The Dynamic of Intermunicipal Cooperation in Regional Marketing Partnerships," LISER Working Paper Series 2010-18, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Joanna Kurowska-Pysz, 2016. "Opportunities for Cross-Border Entrepreneurship Development in a Cluster Model Exemplified by the Polish–Czech Border Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Ly Dai Hung, 2021. "Economic Convergence With Safe Assets," Working Papers hal-03662832, HAL.
    8. Xiaobo Su, 2014. "Multi-Scalar Regionalization, Network Connections and the Development of Yunnan Province, China," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 91-104, January.
    9. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    10. I. A. Shubin, 2021. "Cross-Border Trade Of Russian Regions In 2013–2019," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 55-64, December.
    11. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. SOHN Christophe & CHRISTOPOULOS Dimitris & KOSKINEN Johan, 2013. "Geography and social networks. Modelling the effects of territorial borders on policy networks," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-19, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    13. Anastasia V. Vasilieva & Tatyana V. Morozova, 2023. "Tourism Development in Border Regions of Russia: Methodological Foundations of Typology and its Approbation," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(2), pages 242-269.
    14. Magennis Eoin & Corrigan Jordana & Blair Neale & Broin Deiric Ó, 2021. "Planning a Dublin–Belfast Economic Corridor: Networks, engagement and creating opportunities," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 69(4), pages 57-82, December.
    15. Caesar, Beate & Pallagst, Karina M., 2018. "Entwicklungspfade der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit und Status quo," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 12-27, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    16. Ignacio Sacristán López-Bravo & Carlos San Juan Mesonada, 2022. "Effects of Policy Mix on European Regional Convergence," EconPol Working Paper 73, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    17. Kristina Zumbusch & Roland Scherer, 2015. "Cross-Border Governance: Balancing Formalized and Less Formalized Co-Operations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-21, July.
    18. DURAND Frédéric & LAMOUR Christian, 2013. "Les réseaux de la gouvernance transfrontalière : une centralité changeante du pouvoir étatique ? L'étude de l’Eurométropole de Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-14, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    19. Anna A. Dekalchuk, 2014. "Schengen Borders In Practice: Facts About Finland (And Russia)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/IR/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Marcin DÄ…browski, 2012. "Shallow or Deep Europeanisation? The Uneven Impact of EU Cohesion Policy on the Regional and Local Authorities in Poland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 730-745, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970523600300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.