IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i2d10.1007_s11135-024-02012-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helix innovation models: systematic literature review with data analysis script by R software and ChatGPT

Author

Listed:
  • Andréa Aparecida Costa Mineiro

    (Itajubá Federal University)

  • Victor Eduardo Mello Valério

    (Itajubá Federal University)

  • Isabel Cristina Silva Arantes

    (Itajubá Federal University)

  • Sandra Miranda Neves

    (Itajubá Federal University)

  • Rita Cassia Arantes

    (UFLA)

Abstract

Studies of systematic review of the literature have grown as a strategy for understanding certain epistemological fields, considering that these follow specific protocols of analysis in order to compile approaches to various documental corpus. In these terms, this article addresses specifically a systematic review, aiming to know the state of the art about Helix (Triple, Quadruple, Quintuple) and compile theoretical and methodological perspectives for data analysis via statistical language and artificial intelligence. The procedural scope involved compiling the studies and providing a real contribution to the scientific field, operationalizing a systematic review of a quantitative nature, by means of meta-analysis via R software-with pre-programmed operations in Bibliometrix, which allows multiple evaluations in different perspectives in analogy to ChatGPT search results. A total of 21,180 articles were found, distributed in the Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus databases, and meeting exclusion criteria, 1,545 articles were considered for analysis. The results indicate an open and emerging field for studies on Innovation Helices. Furthermore, the results show that at certain stages of the systematic literature review, sometimes R Software performed better, sometimes ChatGPT. Therefore, the use of artificial intelligence can be a complementary and effective way to construct literature reviews. However, the researcher’s knowledge is essential to ensure the quality and scientific rigor of the research. The contribution of the research is threefold. First, it highlights the state of the art of Innovation Helices. Second, it presents the potential of artificial intelligence in literature reviews. Third, it presents a roadmap for data analysis using R software and ChatGPT to guide research and systematic literature reviews in different modalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andréa Aparecida Costa Mineiro & Victor Eduardo Mello Valério & Isabel Cristina Silva Arantes & Sandra Miranda Neves & Rita Cassia Arantes, 2025. "Helix innovation models: systematic literature review with data analysis script by R software and ChatGPT," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1353-1381, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02012-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-02012-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-02012-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-02012-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02012-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.