IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Empresa, comportamiento innovador y Universidad: el caso de la Economía Social en Andalucía/Enterprise, innovating behaviour and University: the case of Andalusian Social Economy

Listed author(s):


    (Departamento de Teoría Económica y Economía Política)



    (Departamento de Teoría Económica y Economía Política)



    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas y Marketing. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Universidad de Sevilla.)

La finalidad de esta investigación es presentar, a partir de datos primarios y secundarios, un modelo cognitivo sobre el comportamiento innovador de las empresas de Economía Social andaluzas, que sea útil a los siguientes agentes sociales: investigadores, empresarios y gestores públicos. Para alcanzar la finalidad previa, se sigue el siguiente itinerario de investigación. En primer lugar, se plantea un modelo teórico en el que la decisión de innovar (comportamiento innovador) depende de condicionantes internos (cultura organizativa, tamaño, diversificación de la actividad, capacidad para asumir riesgos, valoración del entorno…), externos (sector de actividad, localización, Universidad…) y de las interacciones entre ellos (relaciones empresa-Universidad-Estado). A continuación, se diseña un modelo econométrico probit dicótomo, que se aplica a una muestra de 515 empresas de Economía Social de Andalucía y que se estima mediante máxima verosimilitud. Los resultados revelan que la existencia de relacio- nes con la Universidad tiene un efecto positivo sobre la probabilidad de innovar. No obstante, cuantitativamente, el mayor efecto procede de las variables representativas de la localización. The aim of this research is to offer a cognitive model of innovating behaviour of Andalusian Social Economy enterprises, using both primary and secondary data, that can be considered useful by researchers, entrepreneurs and public managers. In order to reach the previous purpose, the following itinerary of investigation is followed. In the first place, a theoretical model is presented in which the decision to innovate (innovating behaviour) depends on internal conditions (organizational culture, size, diversification of activity, capacity to assume risks, valuation of environment…), external factors (sector of activity, location, University,…) and interactive relationships (University-Industry-Government relations). Next, an econometric probit model is designed and applied to a sample of 515 companies of Social Economy of Andalusia and estimated by maximum likelihood. Our findings reveal that having relationships with Universities increases the probability of innovating. Nevertheless, location appears to hae the mayor impact on that decision.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Estudios de Economía Aplicada in its journal Estudios de Economía Aplicada.

Volume (Year): 23 (2005)
Issue (Month): (Diciembre)
Pages: 583-606

in new window

Handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:23_3_3
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Beatriz Rodríguez Prado. Facultad de CC.EE. y EE. Avda. Valle del Esgueva. Valladolid 47011 SPAIN

Phone: (34) 983 423320
Fax: (34) 983 184568
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
  2. Oerlemans, L.A.G. & Meeus, M.T.H. & Boekema, F.W.M., 2001. "Firm clustering and innovation," Other publications TiSEM c4398688-1710-449a-83e7-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  3. Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 857-880.
  4. Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 243-255, February.
  5. Anselin, Luc & Varga, Attila & Acs, Zoltan, 1997. "Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 422-448, November.
  6. J. P. Francois & F. Favre & S. Negassi, 2002. "Competence and Organization: Two Drivers of Innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 249-270.
  7. Cohen, Wesley M & Klepper, Steven, 1992. "The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, March.
  8. de Castro, Eduardo Anselmo & Rodrigues, Carlos & Esteves, Carlos & da Rosa Pires, Artur, 2000. "The triple helix model as a motor for the creative use of telematics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 193-203, February.
  9. repec:hhs:iuiwop:430 is not listed on IDEAS
  10. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988, August.
  11. Galende, Jesus & de la Fuente, Juan Manuel, 2003. "Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 715-736, May.
  12. Beneito, Pilar, 2003. "Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 693-713, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrk:eeaart:23_3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beatriz Rodríguez Prado)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.