IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i1d10.1007_s11135-024-01960-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the tenure track system and basic pay scale system of academic professionals working in public universities: a qualitative approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wajeeha Muzaffar Hashmi

    (COMSATS University Islamabad)

  • Rana Nadir Idrees

    (COMSATS University Islamabad)

  • Muhammad Haseeb Shakil

    (COMSATS University Islamabad
    The Superior University)

  • Rabika Nadeem

    (The Superior University)

  • Sayyed Zaman Haider

    (Mercer University)

Abstract

The Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan has introduced many productive schemes to ensure that higher education maintains its high standards of quality and excellence (Khan, T.A., Jabeen, N.: Tenure track system in higher education institutions of Pakistan: Prospects and challenges. Educational Res. Reviews. 6(9), 605–621 (2011)). The Tenure-Track System (TTS) was introduced in Pakistan in 2002 to improve the quality of education by hiring highly qualified faculty in higher education institutes, especially public universities. Another system is the Basic Pay Scale System (BPS). It governs how much an employee gets as salary or wages depending on their grade, experience, position, or tenure within an organization and the effort expended to accomplish a particular work. The study aims to make the comparison between these two compensation systems and to know the challenges faced by the faculty members working on both systems to know a way forward to improve the systems for faculty members. The nature of the study is qualitative, and the researcher has contacted twenty faculty members (ten faculty members working on BPS and ten working on TTS) to do in-depth face-to-face interviews in four public sector universities with the academic professionals working on BPS and TTS. Participants in the survey will comprehend that their names will be kept private by receiving a clear explanation. The results indicate that TTS faculty members receive higher salaries and clearer promotion criteria but face greater job insecurity and workload compared to their BPS counterparts, who benefit from job security and pensions but have lower salaries and less transparent promotion paths. Additionally, TTS faculty members reported challenges related to research funding and publication requirements, while BPS faculty members expressed concerns over limited career progression opportunities. Overall, the study highlights the need for a unified compensation system that combines the strengths of both TTS and BPS, ensuring fair remuneration, job security, and support for academic research. This would enhance faculty motivation and performance, ultimately improving the quality of higher education in Pakistan. The study contributes to the understanding of faculty compensation systems and provides practical recommendations for policymakers and educational administrators.

Suggested Citation

  • Wajeeha Muzaffar Hashmi & Rana Nadir Idrees & Muhammad Haseeb Shakil & Rabika Nadeem & Sayyed Zaman Haider, 2025. "Exploring the tenure track system and basic pay scale system of academic professionals working in public universities: a qualitative approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 739-759, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01960-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01960-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01960-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01960-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Cater & Byron Lew & Marcus Pivato, 2017. "The Efficiency of Tenure Contracts in Academic Employment," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 19(2), pages 331-361, April.
    2. Thomas König & Marc Debus, 2011. "Veto Players, Reform Processes and Policy Change: Concluding Remarks," Studies in Public Choice, in: Thomas König & Marc Debus & George Tsebelis (ed.), Reform Processes and Policy Change, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 269-283, Springer.
    3. João Ricardo Faria & Gonçalo Monteiro, 2008. "The Tenure Game: Building Up Academic Habits," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 370-380, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Asali, 2019. "A tale of two tracks," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 323-337, May.
    2. Franklin G. Mixon & Kamal P. Upadhyaya, 2024. "When forgiveness beats permission: Exploring the scholarly ethos of clinical faculty in economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(1), pages 75-91, January.
    3. Besancenot, Damien & Huynh, Kim & Vranceanu, Radu, 2006. "The "Read or Write" Dilemma in Academic Production: A European Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 06021, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    4. Franklin G. Mixon, 2018. "Do academics swing for the fences after tenure? Analysis of attributions data from economics research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2155-2160, September.
    5. Sergey V. Popov, 2015. "Tenure-track contract helps self-selection," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2482-2486.
    6. Damien Besancenot & Kim Huynh & Radu Vranceanu, 2009. "The ‘Read or Write’ Dilemma in Academic Production: A Transatlantic Perspective," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 53(1), pages 75-84, March.
    7. Joao Ricardo Faria & Peter McAdam, 2014. "Does Tenure Make Researchers Less Productive? The Case of the “Specialist”," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0514, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    8. João Ricardo Faria & Rajeev K. Goel, 2016. "Academic Publication Uncertainty and Publishing Behavior: A Game-Theoretic Perspective," CESifo Working Paper Series 6176, CESifo.
    9. Paul Levine & Peter McAdam & Peter Welz, 2013. "On Habit and the Socially Efficient Level of Consumption and Work Effort," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0713, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    10. Brian H Spitzberg, 2018. "Framing the Game: An Architectonic Analogue for Meta-Theorizing Academic Activities," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 11-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01960-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.