IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v85y2020i3d10.1007_s11336-020-09725-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latent Theme Dictionary Model for Finding Co-occurrent Patterns in Process Data

Author

Listed:
  • Guanhua Fang

    (Columbia University)

  • Zhiliang Ying

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

Process data, which are temporally ordered sequences of categorical observations, are of recent interest due to its increasing abundance and the desire to extract useful information. A process is a collection of time-stamped events of different types, recording how an individual behaves in a given time period. The process data are too complex in terms of size and irregularity for the classical psychometric models to be directly applicable and, consequently, new ways for modeling and analysis are desired. We introduce herein a latent theme dictionary model for processes that identifies co-occurrent event patterns and individuals with similar behavioral patterns. Theoretical properties are established under certain regularity conditions for the likelihood-based estimation and inference. A nonparametric Bayes algorithm using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method is proposed for computation. Simulation studies show that the proposed approach performs well in a range of situations. The proposed method is applied to an item in the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment with interpretable findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanhua Fang & Zhiliang Ying, 2020. "Latent Theme Dictionary Model for Finding Co-occurrent Patterns in Process Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 775-811, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:85:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-020-09725-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-020-09725-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-020-09725-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-020-09725-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishwaran H. & Rao J.S., 2003. "Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes in Microarrays Using Bayesian Model Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 438-455, January.
    2. Oecd, 2016. "PISA 2015 Results in Focus," PISA in Focus 67, OECD Publishing.
    3. Dunson, David B. & Xing, Chuanhua, 2009. "Nonparametric Bayes Modeling of Multivariate Categorical Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1042-1051.
    4. Ke Deng & Zhi Geng & Jun S. Liu, 2014. "Association pattern discovery via theme dictionary models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(2), pages 319-347, March.
    5. Guanhua Fang & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2019. "On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 19-40, March.
    6. W. Gibson, 1959. "Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 24(3), pages 229-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Liu & Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2024. "Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 592-625, June.
    2. Kunihama, T. & Herring, A.H. & Halpern, C.T. & Dunson, D.B., 2016. "Nonparametric Bayes modeling with sample survey weights," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 41-48.
    3. Mahsa Samsami & Ralf Wagner, 2021. "Investment Decisions with Endogeneity: A Dirichlet Tree Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Enrico Toffalini & Paolo Girardi & David Giofrè & Gianmarco Altoè, 2022. "Entia Non Sunt Multiplicanda … Shall I look for clusters in my cognitive data?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Guanhua Fang & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2019. "On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 19-40, March.
    6. Durante, Daniele, 2017. "A note on the multiplicative gamma process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 198-204.
    7. James Joseph Balamuta & Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2022. "Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA–GAMMA Data Augmentation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 903-945, September.
    8. HyungJun Cho & Jaewoo Kang & Jae Lee, 2009. "Empirical Bayes analysis of unreplicated microarray data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 393-408, August.
    9. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.
    10. Yajuan Si & Jerome P. Reiter, 2013. "Nonparametric Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Categorical Variables in Large-Scale Assessment Surveys," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(5), pages 499-521, October.
    11. Xin Xu & Guanhua Fang & Jinxin Guo & Zhiliang Ying & Susu Zhang, 2024. "Diagnostic Classification Models for Testlets: Methods and Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 851-876, September.
    12. Bansal Naveen K., 2007. "Decision theoretic Bayesian hypothesis testing with the selection goal," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 19-39, January.
    13. Koop, Gary & Korobilis, Dimitris, 2016. "Model uncertainty in Panel Vector Autoregressive models," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 115-131.
    14. Yuqi Gu, 2024. "Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 118-150, March.
    15. Ishwaran, Hemant & Sunil Rao, J., 2011. "Consistency of spike and slab regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(12), pages 1920-1928.
    16. Jared S. Murray & Jerome P. Reiter, 2016. "Multiple Imputation of Missing Categorical and Continuous Values via Bayesian Mixture Models With Local Dependence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1466-1479, October.
    17. Hiroyuki Kasahara & Katsumi Shimotsu, 2014. "Non-parametric identification and estimation of the number of components in multivariate mixtures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(1), pages 97-111, January.
    18. Planas Christophe & Rossi Alessandro, 2024. "The slice sampler and centrally symmetric distributions," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 30(3), pages 299-313.
    19. Zilanawala, Afshin & Sacker, Amanda & Kelly, Yvonne, 2019. "Internalising and externalising behaviour profiles across childhood: The consequences of changes in the family environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 207-216.
    20. Xuliang Gao & Wenchao Ma & Daxun Wang & Yan Cai & Dongbo Tu, 2021. "A Class of Cognitive Diagnosis Models for Polytomous Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 297-322, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:85:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-020-09725-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.