IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v7y2023i6d10.1007_s41669-023-00440-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations and a Review of Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Eaglestone

    (University of Greenwich)

  • Evdoxia Gkaintatzi

    (University of Greenwich)

  • Harmony Jiang

    (University of Greenwich)

  • Charlotte Stoner

    (University of Greenwich)

  • Rosana Pacella

    (University of Greenwich)

  • Paul McCrone

    (University of Greenwich)

Abstract

Background Dementia prevalence is increasing, with no cure at present. Drug therapies have potential side effects and risk of mortality. People with dementia are frequently offered non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life and relieve symptoms. Identifying which interventions are cost-effective is important due to finite resources in healthcare services. Aims The aims were to review published economic evaluations of community and nursing home non-pharmacological interventions for people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and assess the usefulness of these evaluations for decision making in health services, for use by policy and local and national decision makers. Methods We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021252999) of economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions for dementia or mild cognitive impairment with a narrative approach to data synthesis. Exclusions: interventions for dementia prevention/early detection/end of life care. Databases searched: Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycInfo, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, PsycArticles, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Business Source Premier and Regional Business News; timeframe 1 January 2011–11 May 2023. Reporting quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Results The review included 37 economic evaluations and four reviews worldwide across several distinct forms of care: physical activity, cognition, training, multicomponent, assistive technology and other (specialist dementia care, group living, home care vs care home). The intervention with the strongest evidence of cost-effectiveness was maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy. Case management, occupational therapy and dementia care management also showed good evidence of cost-effectiveness. Conclusion More economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of specific dementia care interventions is needed, with consistency of methods and outcome measures. This could improve local and national decision makers’ confidence to promote future cost-effective dementia interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Eaglestone & Evdoxia Gkaintatzi & Harmony Jiang & Charlotte Stoner & Rosana Pacella & Paul McCrone, 2023. "Cost-Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations and a Review of Reviews," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 7(6), pages 887-914, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00440-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00440-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00440-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00440-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qinglu Cheng & Nicholas Graves & Rosana E. Pacella, 2018. "Economic Evaluations of Guideline-Based Care for Chronic Wounds: a Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 633-651, October.
    2. Brown, Heather & D'Amico, Francesco & Knapp, Martin & Orrell, Martin & Rehill, Amritpal & Vale, Luke & Robinson, Louise, 2019. "A cost effectiveness analysis of maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy (MCST) for people with dementia: examining the influence of cognitive ability and living arrangements," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100841, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Rose Sherri & van der Laan Mark J., 2009. "Why Match? Investigating Matched Case-Control Study Designs with Causal Effect Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Klemens, 2022. "An analysis of US domestic migration via subset-stable measures of administrative data," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 351-382, May.
    2. Rose Sherri & van der Laan Mark J., 2011. "A Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Two-Stage Designs," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    3. van der Laan Mark J. & Petersen Maya & Zheng Wenjing, 2013. "Estimating the Effect of a Community-Based Intervention with Two Communities," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 83-106, June.
    4. Carmen Selva-Sevilla & Elena Conde-Montero & Manuel Gerónimo-Pardo, 2020. "Bayesian Regression Model for a Cost-Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Punch Grafting Versus Usual Care for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Based Causal Inference: Part I," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-45, February.
    6. Christopher Vahl & Qing Kang, 2015. "Analysis of an outcome-dependent enriched sample: hypothesis tests," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 387-409, September.
    7. Ashley Layer & Emma McManus & N. J. Levell, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Venous Leg Ulcers," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 211-222, June.
    8. Yu-Jen Cheng & Mei-Cheng Wang, 2012. "Estimating Propensity Scores and Causal Survival Functions Using Prevalent Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 707-716, September.
    9. Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb & Ali Ben Charif & Chantal Brisson & Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud & Alain Milot & Xavier Trudel & Éric Demers & Jason Robert Guertin, 2024. "Direct medical costs of cardiovascular diseases: Do cost components vary according to sex and age?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Knapp, Martin & Wong, Gloria, 2020. "Economics and mental health: the current scenario," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102717, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. van der Laan Mark J. & Gruber Susan, 2010. "Collaborative Double Robust Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-71, May.
    12. Francisco Polidoro & Charlotte Jacobs, 2024. "Knowledge diffusion in nascent industries: Asymmetries between startups and established firms in spurring inventions by other firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 807-845, April.
    13. Sherri Rose & Julie Shi & Thomas G. McGuire & Sharon-Lise T. Normand, 2017. "Matching and Imputation Methods for Risk Adjustment in the Health Insurance Marketplaces," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 525-542, December.
    14. Flynn, Rachel M. & Lissy, Rachel & Alicea, Stacey & Tazartes, Lisa & McKay, Mary M., 2016. "Professional development for teachers plus coaching related to school-wide suspensions for a large urban school system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 29-39.
    15. van der Laan Mark J. & Gruber Susan, 2012. "Targeted Minimum Loss Based Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Time Point Interventions," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-41, May.
    16. David Brain & Amarzaya Jadambaa, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Long-Term Survivorship Care for Cancer Patients in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review for Decision-Makers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-34, November.
    17. repec:plo:pone00:0238723 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00440-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.