IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v17y2024i1d10.1007_s12063-023-00409-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable sourcing for a sustainable future: the role of organizational motives and stakeholder pressure

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsin Shahzad

    (LNU-MSU College of International Business, Liaoning Normal University)

  • Saif UR Rehman

    (University of Management and Technology)

  • Abaid Ullah Zafar

    (Wenzhou-Kean University)

  • Khansa Masood

    (University of Management and Technology)

Abstract

Implementing sustainable sourcing practices (SSP) relies strongly on organizational decisions and the motives behind these decisions. However, little is known about how SSP are influenced by organizational motives (OM). To address this gap, we developed a multifaceted framework based on stakeholder theory (ST) that enables enhanced knowledge of OM, such as instrumental motives (IM), relational motives (RM), moral motives (MM), and their influence on SSP by incorporating the moderating role of stakeholder pressure (STP). Data were compiled from 308 Pakistani manufacturing organizational respondents and assayed by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The deliverables of SEM validated that all OM directly impact SSP. Further, STP expressively moderated the targeted relations in confounding ways and organizational size moderately distinguished small and larger organizations. Importance-performance map analysis also revealed that RM have a greater importance value (0.201) and MM have a greater performance value (71.833) than all exogenous variables. This research offers several key contributions. First, all three OM (IM, RM, and MM) significantly improve SSP directly, and with the moderation of STP and organizational size, which signifies the salience of ST and provide diverse conclusions. Second, OM operationalize SSP and suggest ways to execute them to meet the organizational environmental goals. Third, this study examines how SSP implementation requires the source function to reconsider its key motives for sustainability endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsin Shahzad & Saif UR Rehman & Abaid Ullah Zafar & Khansa Masood, 2024. "Sustainable sourcing for a sustainable future: the role of organizational motives and stakeholder pressure," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 75-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00409-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00409-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00409-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00409-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antony Paulraj & Injazz J. Chen & Constantin Blome, 2017. "Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 239-258, October.
    2. Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal, 2013. "Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 241-255, January.
    3. Patricia Rogetzer & Lena Silbermayr & Werner Jammernegg, 2018. "Sustainable sourcing of strategic raw materials by integrating recycled materials," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 421-451, September.
    4. Prouteau, Lionel & Wolff, François-Charles, 2008. "On the relational motive for volunteer work," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 314-335, June.
    5. Nina Edh Mirzaei & Per Hilletofth & Rudrajeet Pal, 2021. "Challenges to competitive manufacturing in high-cost environments: checklist and insights from Swedish manufacturing firms," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 272-292, December.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 531-543, September.
    7. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    8. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Asad Ali Qazi & Andrea Appolloni & Abdul Rehman Shaikh, 2022. "Does the stakeholder's relationship affect supply chain resilience and organizational performance? Empirical evidence from the supply chain community of Pakistan," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(7), pages 1879-1900, October.
    10. Andrea Ferrari & Giulio Mangano & Anna Corinna Cagliano & Alberto De Marco, 2023. "4.0 technologies in city logistics: an empirical investigation of contextual factors," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 345-362, March.
    11. Chengli Shu & Kevin Z. Zhou & Yazhen Xiao & Shanxing Gao, 2016. "How Green Management Influences Product Innovation in China: The Role of Institutional Benefits," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 471-485, February.
    12. Jung Wan Lee & Young Min Kim & Young Ei Kim, 2018. "Antecedents of Adopting Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Green Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 397-409, March.
    13. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    15. Cheng Jin & Mohsin Shahzad & Abaid Ullah Zafar & Norazah Mohd Suki, 2022. "Socio-economic and environmental drivers of green innovation: evidence from nonlinear ARDL," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 5336-5356, December.
    16. Luísa Pinto, 2020. "Green supply chain practices and company performance in Portuguese manufacturing sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1832-1849, July.
    17. Xiangan Ding & Ying Qu & Mohsin Shahzad, 2019. "The Impact of Environmental Administrative Penalties on the Disclosure of Environmental Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Heike Schulze & Lydia Bals & Jon Warwick, 2022. "A sustainable sourcing competence model for purchasing and supply management professionals," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1418-1444, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Endah Rahayu Lestari & Nimas Mayang Sabrina Sunyoto, 2023. "Fostering green innovation in achieving sustainable performance," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 413-434, August.
    2. Dan Huang & Jie Cheng & Xiaofeng Quan & Yanling Wu, 2024. "Managerial attention to environmental protection and corporate green innovation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1047-1081, October.
    3. Bang-Ning Hwang & Chi-Yo Huang & Chih-Hsiung Wu, 2016. "A TOE Approach to Establish a Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Ying Guo & Lifang Wang, 2022. "Environmental Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Environmental Innovation and Stakeholder Pressure," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, February.
    5. Chotia, Varun & Cheng, Yue & Agarwal, Reeti & Vishnoi, Sushant Kumar, 2024. "AI-enabled Green Business Strategy: Path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Huang, Yi-Chun & Chen, Chih Ta, 2022. "Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan's high-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Feng Zhang & Lei Zhu, 2019. "Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1012-1026, September.
    8. Md. Shajul Islam & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel & Md. Mahedi Hasan, 2023. "Environmental and Social Performance of the Banking Industry in Bangladesh: Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure and Green Practice Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Lu Qiu & Die Hu & Yu Wang, 2020. "How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2695-2714, September.
    10. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Angela González, 2025. "Examining environmental proactivity in the Spanish wine industry: The moderating role of size," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 127-157, January.
    12. Yingqi Wei & Sasa Ding & Ziko Konwar, 2022. "The two faces of FDI in environmental performance: a meta-analysis of empirical evidence in China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 65-94, January.
    13. Guo Li & Ming K. Lim & Zhaohua Wang, 2020. "Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 961-982, July.
    14. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    15. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2014. "Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 173-187.
    16. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2023. "Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Qualitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Shubo Liu & Min-Ren Yan, 2018. "Corporate Sustainability and Green Innovation in an Emerging Economy—An Empirical Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, November.
    18. Francesco Gangi & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2020. "How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1975-1991, July.
    19. Laura Laguna-Salvadó & Matthieu Lauras & Uche Okongwu & Tina Comes, 2019. "A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1303-1343, December.
    20. Li, Qian & Xue, Qiuzhi & Truong, Yann & Xiong, Jie, 2018. "MNCs' industrial linkages and environmental spillovers in emerging economies: The case of China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 346-355.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00409-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.